Abstract
Abstract. The patients with soft tissue injuries by foreign bodies are encountered frequently by the emergency physicians. In the emergency services, the advanced radiological imaging techniques should be requested in the patients who have a history of foreign body injury, if it was not detected by plain radiographs. Though the plain radiography is very useful for detection of metal foreign bodies, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and the computed tomography are superior for the detection of wood, glass and plastic foreign bodies. The foreign bodies that were not removed with the surgery can cause allergic, inflammatory or infectious process. Old foreign body injuries should be investigated in the patients with non-healing infection, or osteomyelitis history. The surgical exploration should not be avoided for diagnostic aim. In this case, we are presenting a pediatric patient developed metacarpal bone osteomyelitis due to foreign body which was diagnosed lately.
Key words: Foreign body imaging, plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, osteomyelitis
References
- Pai VS. Wooden foreign bodies in the hand. N Z Med J 1997; 110: 215.
- Yıldırım C, Sözüer EM, Avsaroğulları L, Karaoğlu S, Günay N. Removal of radiopaque foreign bodies ambedded in soft tissues by stereotaxic approach. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery 1999; 5: 213-216.
- Fornage BD, Schernberg FL. Sonographic diagnosis of foreign bodies of the distal extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 567-569.
- Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ. Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 557-562.
- Kobs JK, Hansen AR, Keefe B. A retained wooden foreign body in the foot detected by ultrasonography. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 2962
- Bodne D, Quinn SF, Cochran CF. Imaging foreign glass and wooden bodies of the extremities with CT and MR. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12: 608-611. Orlinsky M, Knittel P, Feit T, Chan L, Mandavia D. The comparative accuracy of radiolucent foreign body detection using ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18: 401-403.
- Gilbert FJ, Campbell RS, Bayliss AP. The role of ultrasound in the detection of non-radiopaque foreign bodies. Clin Radiol 1990; 41: 109-112.
- Gulati D, Agrawal A. Wooden foreign body in the forearm--presentation after eight years. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery 2010; 16: 373-3
Abstract
References
- Pai VS. Wooden foreign bodies in the hand. N Z Med J 1997; 110: 215.
- Yıldırım C, Sözüer EM, Avsaroğulları L, Karaoğlu S, Günay N. Removal of radiopaque foreign bodies ambedded in soft tissues by stereotaxic approach. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery 1999; 5: 213-216.
- Fornage BD, Schernberg FL. Sonographic diagnosis of foreign bodies of the distal extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 567-569.
- Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ. Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 557-562.
- Kobs JK, Hansen AR, Keefe B. A retained wooden foreign body in the foot detected by ultrasonography. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 2962
- Bodne D, Quinn SF, Cochran CF. Imaging foreign glass and wooden bodies of the extremities with CT and MR. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12: 608-611. Orlinsky M, Knittel P, Feit T, Chan L, Mandavia D. The comparative accuracy of radiolucent foreign body detection using ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18: 401-403.
- Gilbert FJ, Campbell RS, Bayliss AP. The role of ultrasound in the detection of non-radiopaque foreign bodies. Clin Radiol 1990; 41: 109-112.
- Gulati D, Agrawal A. Wooden foreign body in the forearm--presentation after eight years. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery 2010; 16: 373-3
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Case Report |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | October 2, 2013 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2013 Volume: 18 Issue: 3 |