WHAT DO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND OLDER PEOPLE THINK ABOUT THE TRAINING OF THE PERSONAL CARE GIVERS? A TRANSNATIONAL STUDY
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the profile of the Personal Care
Givers (PCGs), for the preparation of the basic training curriculum, who are
serving for the older people and the people with disabilities (PwD) among the
selected European countries. A total of 276 questionnaires were completed by
respondents living in Flanders (Belgium), Bulgaria, Germany and Turkey, online
or during an interview/focus group. All the questionnaires were completed by
the participants online in those EU countries who took part in this study. Concerning
the demographics of the beneficiaries, there were respondents exceeded 75 years
of age (34.8%) and there was equal representation of the two genders. The 67.0%
of the respondents encountered motor disabilities, while 27.9% stated that they
encountered problems with vision, 24.9% with hearing, 15% encounter
intellectual disabilities and 19.3% suffer from chronic diseases. While most of
the respondents (84%) need assistance at home, they also highlighted the need
of assistance in the workplace, in education, as well as in vocational
rehabilitation. 35% of the respondents stated that they need assistance in at
community. The results are extremely encouraging for the development of the personal
care giver (PCG) training curriculum and material, since people from target
groups identified that the preferred methods for training cover all areas that
the selected EU countries plan to address. Together with the training modules
that are already in practice by vocational and educational training (VET)
centers, which were identified during the desktop research, the research’s
results will work as a guide for the production of the study's outcomes.
Bu çalışmanın amacı, seçilmiş Avrupa ülkelerinde kişisel bakım
verenlerin (KBV) genel profilinin araştırılması ve hazırlanacak eğitim müfredatına
temel oluşturmasıdır. Belçika, Bulgaristan, Almanya ve Türkiye’de yaşayan
toplam 276 anket çevrimiçi veya yüz yüze olarak tamamlandı. Avrupa Birliği
ülkelerindeki tüm anketler çevrimiçi olarak uygulandı. Yararlanıcıların demografik
verilerine bakıldığında, 75 yaşını geçenlerin (%34,8) de yer aldığı ve her iki
cinsiyetin eşit şekilde yer aldıkları görüldü. Cevap verenlerin %67,0’si
fiziksel engelliyken, %27,9’u görme, 24,9’u işitme %15’i bilişsel ve %19,3’ü
kronik hastalığa sahipti. Katılımcıların %84’ü evde bakıma ihtiyaç duyarken,
birçoğunun iş ortamında, eğitim aldıkları yerlerde ve meşguliyet merkezlerinde
yardıma ihtiyaçları olduğu tespit edildi. %35 katılımcı toplum içerisinde
desteğe ihtiyacı olduğunu bildirdi. Ortaya çıkan sonuçlar, bakım verenlerin ihtiyaçlarını ortaya koyarak,
seçilen Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinde geliştirilmesi gereken eğitim müfredatının
içeriğinin belirlenmesinde çok önemli veriler ortaya koymuştur. Mesleki eğitim
merkezlerinde hâlihazırda vergilemekte olan eğitimlerin değerlendirilmesine
fırsat vererek önemli veriler ortaya koymuştur.
Keywords
References
- 1. Eurostat. Disability statistics-prevalence and demographics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Disability_statistics-health (Accessed July 15, 2015) 2. Eurostat. Population ageing in Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/kina26426enc.pdf (Accessed July 15, 2015) 3. European Commission. Study of Compilation of Disability Statistical Data from The Administrative Registers Of The Member States. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=3007&langId=en (Accessed 15 July 2015) 4. European Commission Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions. European Disability Strategy 2010-2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/europe2020stocktaking_en.pdf (Accessed: August 15, 2015) 5. Stone R, Cafferata GL, Sangl J. Caregivers of the frail elderly: A national profile. Gerontology, 1987, 27: 616-626. 6. Bookman A, Harrington M. Family Caregivers: A Shadow Workforce in the Geriatric Health Care System? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2007;23:1105–41. 7. Given B, Sherwood PR, Given CW: State of the Science: Professional Partners Supporting Family Caregivers. American Journal of Nursing. 2008;108 Supplement: 28–34. 8. Cox EO, Dooley AC. Care-receivers’ perception of their role in the care process. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 1996;26:133–152. 9. Blomquist KB, Brown G, Peersen A, et al. Transitioning to independence: challenges for young people with disabilities and their caregivers. Orthop Nurs. 1998;17:27-35. 10. Mangabeira WC, Lee RM, Fielding NG: Computers and qualitative research: Adoption, use, and representation. Social Science Computer Review. 2004;22:167-78. 11. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R: In: Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1998. 12. Giovannetti ER, Wolff JL. Cross-survey differences in national estimates of numbers of caregivers of disabled older adults. Milbank Q. 2010;88: 310–349. 13. http://absoluutvzw.be/index.php/home/home-informeren/home-wat-is-pab%23welke-overeenkomsten-kan-je-afsluiten (Accessed July 10, 2015) 14. http://www.mlsp.government.bg/index.php?section=HOMEN2&lang=eng (Accessed June 10, 2015) 15. http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_10/10110701_5378_sayili_kanun.pdf (Accessed July 10, 2015) 16. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2007/10/20071023-10.htm (Accessed July 18, 2015) 17. Horowitz A, Dobrof R. The role of families in providing long term care to the frail and chronically ill elderly living in the community: Final Report submitted to Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (grant no. 18-P-9754/2-02), Washington, D.C, 1982. 18. Giovannetti ER. Measurement of informal caregiving to older disabled adults in the United States, Dissertation Thesis. The Johns Hopkins University, 2009. 19. Wolff JL, Dy SM, Frick KD, Kasper JD. End-of-Life Care: Findings From a National Survey of Informal Caregivers. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(1):40-46.
Abstract
References
- 1. Eurostat. Disability statistics-prevalence and demographics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Disability_statistics-health (Accessed July 15, 2015) 2. Eurostat. Population ageing in Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/kina26426enc.pdf (Accessed July 15, 2015) 3. European Commission. Study of Compilation of Disability Statistical Data from The Administrative Registers Of The Member States. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=3007&langId=en (Accessed 15 July 2015) 4. European Commission Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions. European Disability Strategy 2010-2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/europe2020stocktaking_en.pdf (Accessed: August 15, 2015) 5. Stone R, Cafferata GL, Sangl J. Caregivers of the frail elderly: A national profile. Gerontology, 1987, 27: 616-626. 6. Bookman A, Harrington M. Family Caregivers: A Shadow Workforce in the Geriatric Health Care System? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2007;23:1105–41. 7. Given B, Sherwood PR, Given CW: State of the Science: Professional Partners Supporting Family Caregivers. American Journal of Nursing. 2008;108 Supplement: 28–34. 8. Cox EO, Dooley AC. Care-receivers’ perception of their role in the care process. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 1996;26:133–152. 9. Blomquist KB, Brown G, Peersen A, et al. Transitioning to independence: challenges for young people with disabilities and their caregivers. Orthop Nurs. 1998;17:27-35. 10. Mangabeira WC, Lee RM, Fielding NG: Computers and qualitative research: Adoption, use, and representation. Social Science Computer Review. 2004;22:167-78. 11. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R: In: Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1998. 12. Giovannetti ER, Wolff JL. Cross-survey differences in national estimates of numbers of caregivers of disabled older adults. Milbank Q. 2010;88: 310–349. 13. http://absoluutvzw.be/index.php/home/home-informeren/home-wat-is-pab%23welke-overeenkomsten-kan-je-afsluiten (Accessed July 10, 2015) 14. http://www.mlsp.government.bg/index.php?section=HOMEN2&lang=eng (Accessed June 10, 2015) 15. http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_10/10110701_5378_sayili_kanun.pdf (Accessed July 10, 2015) 16. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2007/10/20071023-10.htm (Accessed July 18, 2015) 17. Horowitz A, Dobrof R. The role of families in providing long term care to the frail and chronically ill elderly living in the community: Final Report submitted to Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (grant no. 18-P-9754/2-02), Washington, D.C, 1982. 18. Giovannetti ER. Measurement of informal caregiving to older disabled adults in the United States, Dissertation Thesis. The Johns Hopkins University, 2009. 19. Wolff JL, Dy SM, Frick KD, Kasper JD. End-of-Life Care: Findings From a National Survey of Informal Caregivers. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(1):40-46.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 25, 2018 |
| Submission Date | March 23, 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | May 25, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 3 Issue: 2 |
