Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Verification of Precision Mechanical Features with Non-contact Measurement and Comparison with Coordinate Measurement Method

Year 2022, Issue: 17, 71 - 80, 31.12.2022

Abstract

It is common in manufacturing to produce parts that need to integrate with each other to serve a common purpose, to perform one or more operations. How these elements interact is extremely important and affects the overall functionality of an assembly. The mechanical features on the relevant parts, which are effective in mating these parts to each other, must be manufactured according to design intent and must provide a certain level of precision. Basically, measuring technique is used to control and verify the necessary accuracy of mechanical elements with plane, channel, hole and similar forms. Since classical measurement methods could not keep up with the rapid manufacturing processes that emerged with the developing industry, the use of coordinate measuring machines (CMM) has become widespread in the measurement of these forms or features. In addition, non-contact measurement methods, which have become more preferable in recent years, are also promising in terms of accelerating verification processes. However, non-contact measurement methods have been mostly used in the measurement of free-form surfaces and reverse engineering applications until today, and studies on the verification of mechanical features with these methods have remained in the background. In this article, a part with mechanical features in different axial directions is designed and made of aluminum alloy. The manufacturing of the part was carried out by the milling method and all the features of the part were verified with both non-contact measurement method and coordinate measuring machines. As a result of the measurements made for a total of 62 different features, the two methods used were compared.

References

  • Gust P, Sersch A (2020). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS): A Review of Teaching Approaches. Procedia CIRP, 92: 123-128.
  • Dantan JY, Ballu A, Mathieu L (2008). Geometrical product specifications—model for product life cycle. Computer-Aided Design, 40(4): 493-501.
  • Pfeifer T (2015). Production metrology, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Münih, Almanya.
  • Raghavendra NV, Krishnamurthy L (2013). Engineering metrology and measurements, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, Hindistan.
  • Acko B (2007). Calibration of measuring instruments on a coordinate measuring machine. Advances in Production Engineering and Management, 2(4): 127-34.
  • Carmignato S, De Chiffre L (2003). A new method for thread calibration on coordinate measuring machines. CIRP Annals, 52(1): 447-450.
  • de Aquino Silva JB, Burdekin M (2002). A modular space frame for assessing the performance of co-ordinate measuring machines (CMMs). Precision Engineering, 26(1): 37-48.
  • Poyraz Ö, Kırcı B, Olcay R (2021). Benchmarking Of Low-Cost 3-Dimensional Cameras For Metrological Purposes. International Asian Congress on Contemporary Sciences-V, s. 973-980, Nahcivan, Azerbaycan.
  • Poyraz Ö, Yılmaz O, Yasa E (2014). Investigation of Free-Form Surface Reconstruction Techniques for Reverse Engineering of Worn-Out Gas Turbine Blades: A Case Study. 16th International Conference on Machine Design and Production (UMTIK), vol. 30, İzmir, Türkiye.
  • Ören S, Yasa E, Uğur E, Poyraz Ö, Akbulut G, Pilatin S (2014). Havacılık sektöründe optik ölçüm yöntemlerinin yeri ve karşılaştırmalı değerlendirilmesi üzerine bir çalışma. Mühendis ve Makine, 55(654): 35-60.
  • 3DCHIMERA, 3D Scanning Developer Spray SKD-S2 Aerosol data sheet. Available: https://3dchimera.com/products/3d-scanning-developer-spray
  • Haleem A, Javaid M (2019). 3D scanning applications in medical field: a literature-based review. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 7(2): 199-210.
  • Dong Z, Liang F, Yang B, Xu Y, Zang Y, Li J, Stilla U (2020). Registration of large-scale terrestrial laser scanner point clouds: A review and benchmark. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 163: 327-342.
  • Acemoglu A, Mattos SL (2018). Non-contact tissue ablations with high-speed laser scanning in endoscopic laser microsurgery. 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), s. 3660-3663, Hawaii, ABD.
  • Kersten T, Lindstaedt M, Starosta D (2018). Comparative geometrical accuracy investigations of hand-held 3D scanning systems-An update. ISPRS TC II Mid-term Symposium “Towards Photogrammetry 2020”, s. 487-494, Riva del Garda, İtalya.
  • Zang Y, Yang B, Liang F, Xiao X (2018). Novel adaptive laser scanning method for point clouds of free-form objects. Sensors, 18(7): 1-28.

Hassas Mekanik Unsurların Temassız Ölçüm Yöntemleri ile Doğrulanması ve Koordinat Ölçme Yöntemi ile Karşılaştırılması

Year 2022, Issue: 17, 71 - 80, 31.12.2022

Abstract

Ortak bir amaca hizmet etmek, bir veya daha fazla işlemi gerçekleştirmek için birbiriyle entegre olması gereken parçaların üretilmesi imalatta yaygındır. Bu öğelerin nasıl etkileşime girdiği son derece önemlidir ve bir montajın genel işlevselliğini etkilemektedir. Söz konusu parçaların üzerinde bulunan ve parçaların birbirine bağlanmasında etkili olan mekanik unsurların tasarım amacına yönelik olarak imal edilmesi ve yine kullanım yerine göre belirli seviyede hassasiyeti sağlaması gerekmektedir. Temelde düzlem, kanal, delik ve benzeri formlara sahip olan mekanik unsurların gerekli hassasiyeti sağlama durumunu kontrol etmek ve doğrulamak için ölçme tekniğinden faydalanılır. Klasik ölçüm yöntemleri gelişen endüstri ile beraber ortaya çıkan hızlı imalat süreçlerine yetişemediği için söz konusu unsurların ölçümünde koordinat ölçme makinelerinin (CMM) kullanımı yaygınlaşmıştır. Buna ilaveten son yıllarda tercih edilirlikleri artan temassız ölçüm yöntemleri de doğrulama süreçlerinin hızlandırılması açısından umut vadetmektedir. Fakat temassız ölçüm yöntemleri günümüze kadar çoğunlukla serbest yüzeylerin ölçümünde ve tersine mühendislik uygulamalarında kullanılmış, mekanik unsurların bu yöntemlerle doğrulanmasına yönelik çalışmalar ikinci planda kalmıştır. Bu makalede farklı eksenel yönlerde mekanik unsurlara sahip olan bir parça tasarlanmış ve söz konusu parça alüminyum alaşımından imal edilmiştir. Parçanın imalatı frezeleme yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiş ve parçaya ait tüm unsurlar hem temassız ölçüm yöntemi hem de koordinat ölçme makineleri ile doğrulanmıştır. Toplam 62 farklı unsur için yapılan ölçümlerin sonucunda kullanılan iki yöntem karşılaştırılmıştır.

References

  • Gust P, Sersch A (2020). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS): A Review of Teaching Approaches. Procedia CIRP, 92: 123-128.
  • Dantan JY, Ballu A, Mathieu L (2008). Geometrical product specifications—model for product life cycle. Computer-Aided Design, 40(4): 493-501.
  • Pfeifer T (2015). Production metrology, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Münih, Almanya.
  • Raghavendra NV, Krishnamurthy L (2013). Engineering metrology and measurements, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, Hindistan.
  • Acko B (2007). Calibration of measuring instruments on a coordinate measuring machine. Advances in Production Engineering and Management, 2(4): 127-34.
  • Carmignato S, De Chiffre L (2003). A new method for thread calibration on coordinate measuring machines. CIRP Annals, 52(1): 447-450.
  • de Aquino Silva JB, Burdekin M (2002). A modular space frame for assessing the performance of co-ordinate measuring machines (CMMs). Precision Engineering, 26(1): 37-48.
  • Poyraz Ö, Kırcı B, Olcay R (2021). Benchmarking Of Low-Cost 3-Dimensional Cameras For Metrological Purposes. International Asian Congress on Contemporary Sciences-V, s. 973-980, Nahcivan, Azerbaycan.
  • Poyraz Ö, Yılmaz O, Yasa E (2014). Investigation of Free-Form Surface Reconstruction Techniques for Reverse Engineering of Worn-Out Gas Turbine Blades: A Case Study. 16th International Conference on Machine Design and Production (UMTIK), vol. 30, İzmir, Türkiye.
  • Ören S, Yasa E, Uğur E, Poyraz Ö, Akbulut G, Pilatin S (2014). Havacılık sektöründe optik ölçüm yöntemlerinin yeri ve karşılaştırmalı değerlendirilmesi üzerine bir çalışma. Mühendis ve Makine, 55(654): 35-60.
  • 3DCHIMERA, 3D Scanning Developer Spray SKD-S2 Aerosol data sheet. Available: https://3dchimera.com/products/3d-scanning-developer-spray
  • Haleem A, Javaid M (2019). 3D scanning applications in medical field: a literature-based review. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 7(2): 199-210.
  • Dong Z, Liang F, Yang B, Xu Y, Zang Y, Li J, Stilla U (2020). Registration of large-scale terrestrial laser scanner point clouds: A review and benchmark. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 163: 327-342.
  • Acemoglu A, Mattos SL (2018). Non-contact tissue ablations with high-speed laser scanning in endoscopic laser microsurgery. 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), s. 3660-3663, Hawaii, ABD.
  • Kersten T, Lindstaedt M, Starosta D (2018). Comparative geometrical accuracy investigations of hand-held 3D scanning systems-An update. ISPRS TC II Mid-term Symposium “Towards Photogrammetry 2020”, s. 487-494, Riva del Garda, İtalya.
  • Zang Y, Yang B, Liang F, Xiao X (2018). Novel adaptive laser scanning method for point clouds of free-form objects. Sensors, 18(7): 1-28.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Mechanical Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Mustafa Esnemez

Özgür Poyraz 0000-0001-9892-5738

Early Pub Date December 15, 2022
Publication Date December 31, 2022
Submission Date November 28, 2022
Acceptance Date December 15, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 17

Cite

APA Esnemez, M., & Poyraz, Ö. (2022). Hassas Mekanik Unsurların Temassız Ölçüm Yöntemleri ile Doğrulanması ve Koordinat Ölçme Yöntemi ile Karşılaştırılması. Journal of New Results in Engineering and Natural Sciences(17), 71-80.