Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2020, , 95 - 100, 26.12.2019

Ali Osman Türel , Kadir Emre Buğdaycı

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.615731
Cited By: 4

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Akbağ HI (2013): Katırtırnağı (Spartium junceum), kermes meşesi (Quercus coccifera), deniz üzümü (Ephedra major), akçakesme (Phillyrea latifolia) bitkilerinin keçiler için besleme potansiyeli. Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Çanakkale.
  • 2. Alatürk F, Alpars T, Gökkuş A, et al (2014): Seasonal changes in the nutrient contents of some shrub species. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fak Derg, 2, 133-141.
  • 3. AOAC-The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2000): Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
  • 4. Bardakçı B, Seçilmiş Canbay H (2006): Isparta bölgesindeki gül yağının kimyasal içeriğinin GC MS ve FTIR spektroskopisi tekniği ile incelenmesi. SDÜFEFFD, 1, 64-69.
  • 5. Bate-Smith EC (1975): Phytochemistry of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry, 14, 1107-1113.
  • 6. Charef M, Yousfi M, Saidi M, et al (2008): Determination of the fatty acid composition of acorn (quercus),pistacia lentiscus seeds growing in Algeria. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 85, 921-924.
  • 7. Crampton EW, Maynard L (1938): The relation of cellulose and lignin content to nutritive value of animal feeds. J Nutr, 15, 383-395.
  • 8. Christie WW (1992): Gaz cromatography and lipids. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/75e4/4b2e1b1fa2c419b34b453c5ca6374683bb0b.pdf (Accessed October 10, 2007).
  • 9. Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001): Basic and Clinical Biostatistics, 3rd Ed. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, Newyork.
  • 10. Elahi MY, Rouzbehan Y (2008): Characteriztion of Quercus persica, Quercus infectoria and Quercus libani as ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Tech, 140, 78-89.
  • 11. Ferreira-Dias S, Valente DG, Abreu JMF (2003): Pattern recognition of acorns from different Quercus species based on oil content and fatty acid profile. Grasas Aceites, 54, 384-391.
  • 12. Goering JK, Van Soest PJ (1970): Forage Fiber Analysis. Agricultural Hand Book, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
  • 13. Kamalak A, Hassan KG, Ameen SM, et al (2015): Determination of chemical composition, potential nutritive value and methane emission of oak tree (Quercus coccifera) leaves and nuts. Harran Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 4, 1-5. 14. Kim TK (2017): Understanding one-way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean J Anesthesiol, 70, 22-26.
  • 15. Koukoura Z (1988): Composition of kermes oak browse as affected by shade and stage of maturity. Anim Feed Sci Tech, 21, 1-9.
  • 16. Kökten K, Kaplan M, Turan V, et al (2017): Farklı meşe palamudu türlerinin (Quercus sp.) hayvan besleme özellikleri. 236-240. In: 12.Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi Elektronik Kongre Kitabı, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye.
  • 17. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, et al (1951): Protein measurement with the Folinphenol reagent. J Biol Chem, 193, 265-275.
  • 18. MGM (2017) Meteoroloji genel müdürlüğü, Available at https://www.mgm.gov.tr (Accessed October 28, 2017)
  • 19. Natis AS, Malechek JC (1981): Digestion and utilization of nutrients in oak browse by goats. J Anim Sci 53, 283-290.
  • 20. Özcan T (2007): Characterization of Turkish Quercus L. Taxa based on fatty acid compositions of the acorns. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 84, 653-662.
  • 21. Özçelik H, Çinbilgel İ (2016): Burdur ilinin bitki örtüsü. 17-47. In: H Özçelik (Ed), Burdur ili bitki envanteri (Ekonomik, nadir ve endemik bitkileri). Burdur Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları, Ankara.
  • 22. Parlak AO, Gokkus A, Hakyemez BH, et al. (2011): Forage yield and quality of kermes oak and herbaceous species throughout a year in Mediterranean zone of western Turkey. J Food Agri Environ, 9, 510-515.
  • 23. Petrovic S, Sobajic S, Rakic S, et al (2004): Investigation of kernel oils of Quercus robur and Quercus cerris. Chem Nat Compd, 40, 420-422.
  • 24. Raju J, Sahooa B, Chandrakara A, et al (2015): Effect of feeding oak leaves (Quercus semecarpifolia vs Quercus leucotricophora) on nutrient utilization, growth performanceand gastrointestinal nematodes of goats in temperate sub Himalayas. Small Ruminant Res, 125, 1-9.
  • 25. Roukos C (2016): Seasonal and altitudinal variations in nutritional quality of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) in northwest Greece. Bulg J Agric Sci, 22, 804-814.
  • 26. Roukos C, Parissi ZM, Kyriazopoulos AP, et al (2017): Nutritional quality of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) acorns as affected by altitude in a typical Mediterranean area. Arch Anim Breed, 60, 71-78.
  • 27. Sidahmed A, Morris JG, Koong LJ, et al (1981): Contribution of mixtures of three chaparral shrubs to the protein and energy requirements of spanish goats. J Anim Sci, 53, 1391-1400.
  • 28. SPSS (1999): SPSS for Windows. Available at https://spss-64bits.en.softonic.com/download (Accessed April 20, 2010).
  • 29. Tejerina D, García-Torres S, Cabeza de Vaca M, et al (2011): Acorns (Quercus rotundifolia Lam.) and grass as natural sources of antioxidants and fatty acids in the “montanera” feeding of Iberian pig: Intra- and inter-annual variations. Food Chem, 124, 997-1004.
  • 30. Terrill TH, Rowan AM, Douglas GB, et al (1992): Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals cerael grains. J Sci Food Agric, 58, 321-329.
  • 31. Tilley JMA, Terry RA. (1963): A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Br Grassl Soc, 18, 104.
  • 32. Tolunay A, Adıyaman E, Akyol A, et al. (2014): An investigation on forage yield capacity of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) and grazing planning of mediterranean maquis scrublands for traditional goat farming. Sci World J, Article ID 398479, 1-9.
  • 33. Türkoglu T, Bekiroglu S, Tolunay A (2016): Effect of stocking rate on forage availability and growth performance of goat kids in mediterranean kermes oak shrublands. Kastamonu Univ Orman Fak Derg, 16, 269-279.
  • 34. Villena F, Pfister JA (1990): Sand Shinnery oak as forage for Angora and Spanish goats. J Range Manag 43, 116-122.

Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) growing in the provincial borders of Burdur

Yıl 2020, , 95 - 100, 26.12.2019

Ali Osman Türel , Kadir Emre Buğdaycı

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.615731
Cited By: 4

Öz

The
purpose of this study was to investigate the in vitro dry
matter digestibility (IVDMD), nutrient content, cell wall components, total and
condensed tannin content of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) which
is the main feed source for goat herds. Kermes oak was exemplified in 3
different stations during a year (12 months).  Sampling was made to
include leaves, some branches, acorns and young shoots, if any based on season,
which were consumed by the goats. The amount of dry matter (DM), crude ash
(CA), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), crude fibre (CF), acid detergent
fibre (ADF), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), total
tannin and condensed tannin content, and IVDMD (by using two-stage technique)
were determined on the samples (12 × 3 = 36). Crude protein values were not
statistically significant in terms of seasonal averages. On the other hand, it
was found that the CF in spring and summer was significantly lower than the CF
in winter (P<0.05) and the highest EE during the year was in the autumn (P<0.05).
IVDMD of winter season was significantly lower than summer and autumn. (P<0.05). In
terms of total tannin content, it was revealed that autumn was significantly
lower than winter and spring (P<0.05). It was concluded that the nutritional
values and IVDMD of kermes oak were low in the winter season.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kermes oak In vitro nutrient composition

Kaynakça

  • 1. Akbağ HI (2013): Katırtırnağı (Spartium junceum), kermes meşesi (Quercus coccifera), deniz üzümü (Ephedra major), akçakesme (Phillyrea latifolia) bitkilerinin keçiler için besleme potansiyeli. Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Çanakkale.
  • 2. Alatürk F, Alpars T, Gökkuş A, et al (2014): Seasonal changes in the nutrient contents of some shrub species. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fak Derg, 2, 133-141.
  • 3. AOAC-The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2000): Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
  • 4. Bardakçı B, Seçilmiş Canbay H (2006): Isparta bölgesindeki gül yağının kimyasal içeriğinin GC MS ve FTIR spektroskopisi tekniği ile incelenmesi. SDÜFEFFD, 1, 64-69.
  • 5. Bate-Smith EC (1975): Phytochemistry of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry, 14, 1107-1113.
  • 6. Charef M, Yousfi M, Saidi M, et al (2008): Determination of the fatty acid composition of acorn (quercus),pistacia lentiscus seeds growing in Algeria. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 85, 921-924.
  • 7. Crampton EW, Maynard L (1938): The relation of cellulose and lignin content to nutritive value of animal feeds. J Nutr, 15, 383-395.
  • 8. Christie WW (1992): Gaz cromatography and lipids. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/75e4/4b2e1b1fa2c419b34b453c5ca6374683bb0b.pdf (Accessed October 10, 2007).
  • 9. Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001): Basic and Clinical Biostatistics, 3rd Ed. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, Newyork.
  • 10. Elahi MY, Rouzbehan Y (2008): Characteriztion of Quercus persica, Quercus infectoria and Quercus libani as ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Tech, 140, 78-89.
  • 11. Ferreira-Dias S, Valente DG, Abreu JMF (2003): Pattern recognition of acorns from different Quercus species based on oil content and fatty acid profile. Grasas Aceites, 54, 384-391.
  • 12. Goering JK, Van Soest PJ (1970): Forage Fiber Analysis. Agricultural Hand Book, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
  • 13. Kamalak A, Hassan KG, Ameen SM, et al (2015): Determination of chemical composition, potential nutritive value and methane emission of oak tree (Quercus coccifera) leaves and nuts. Harran Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 4, 1-5. 14. Kim TK (2017): Understanding one-way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean J Anesthesiol, 70, 22-26.
  • 15. Koukoura Z (1988): Composition of kermes oak browse as affected by shade and stage of maturity. Anim Feed Sci Tech, 21, 1-9.
  • 16. Kökten K, Kaplan M, Turan V, et al (2017): Farklı meşe palamudu türlerinin (Quercus sp.) hayvan besleme özellikleri. 236-240. In: 12.Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi Elektronik Kongre Kitabı, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye.
  • 17. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, et al (1951): Protein measurement with the Folinphenol reagent. J Biol Chem, 193, 265-275.
  • 18. MGM (2017) Meteoroloji genel müdürlüğü, Available at https://www.mgm.gov.tr (Accessed October 28, 2017)
  • 19. Natis AS, Malechek JC (1981): Digestion and utilization of nutrients in oak browse by goats. J Anim Sci 53, 283-290.
  • 20. Özcan T (2007): Characterization of Turkish Quercus L. Taxa based on fatty acid compositions of the acorns. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 84, 653-662.
  • 21. Özçelik H, Çinbilgel İ (2016): Burdur ilinin bitki örtüsü. 17-47. In: H Özçelik (Ed), Burdur ili bitki envanteri (Ekonomik, nadir ve endemik bitkileri). Burdur Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları, Ankara.
  • 22. Parlak AO, Gokkus A, Hakyemez BH, et al. (2011): Forage yield and quality of kermes oak and herbaceous species throughout a year in Mediterranean zone of western Turkey. J Food Agri Environ, 9, 510-515.
  • 23. Petrovic S, Sobajic S, Rakic S, et al (2004): Investigation of kernel oils of Quercus robur and Quercus cerris. Chem Nat Compd, 40, 420-422.
  • 24. Raju J, Sahooa B, Chandrakara A, et al (2015): Effect of feeding oak leaves (Quercus semecarpifolia vs Quercus leucotricophora) on nutrient utilization, growth performanceand gastrointestinal nematodes of goats in temperate sub Himalayas. Small Ruminant Res, 125, 1-9.
  • 25. Roukos C (2016): Seasonal and altitudinal variations in nutritional quality of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) in northwest Greece. Bulg J Agric Sci, 22, 804-814.
  • 26. Roukos C, Parissi ZM, Kyriazopoulos AP, et al (2017): Nutritional quality of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) acorns as affected by altitude in a typical Mediterranean area. Arch Anim Breed, 60, 71-78.
  • 27. Sidahmed A, Morris JG, Koong LJ, et al (1981): Contribution of mixtures of three chaparral shrubs to the protein and energy requirements of spanish goats. J Anim Sci, 53, 1391-1400.
  • 28. SPSS (1999): SPSS for Windows. Available at https://spss-64bits.en.softonic.com/download (Accessed April 20, 2010).
  • 29. Tejerina D, García-Torres S, Cabeza de Vaca M, et al (2011): Acorns (Quercus rotundifolia Lam.) and grass as natural sources of antioxidants and fatty acids in the “montanera” feeding of Iberian pig: Intra- and inter-annual variations. Food Chem, 124, 997-1004.
  • 30. Terrill TH, Rowan AM, Douglas GB, et al (1992): Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals cerael grains. J Sci Food Agric, 58, 321-329.
  • 31. Tilley JMA, Terry RA. (1963): A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Br Grassl Soc, 18, 104.
  • 32. Tolunay A, Adıyaman E, Akyol A, et al. (2014): An investigation on forage yield capacity of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) and grazing planning of mediterranean maquis scrublands for traditional goat farming. Sci World J, Article ID 398479, 1-9.
  • 33. Türkoglu T, Bekiroglu S, Tolunay A (2016): Effect of stocking rate on forage availability and growth performance of goat kids in mediterranean kermes oak shrublands. Kastamonu Univ Orman Fak Derg, 16, 269-279.
  • 34. Villena F, Pfister JA (1990): Sand Shinnery oak as forage for Angora and Spanish goats. J Range Manag 43, 116-122.
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Veteriner Cerrahi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ali Osman Türel 0000-0003-0207-8293

Kadir Emre Buğdaycı 0000-0002-1715-6904

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA Türel, A. O., & Buğdaycı, K. E. (2019). Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) growing in the provincial borders of Burdur. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 67(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.615731
AMA Türel AO, Buğdaycı KE. Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) growing in the provincial borders of Burdur. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. Aralık 2019;67(1):95-100. doi:10.33988/auvfd.615731
Chicago Türel, Ali Osman, ve Kadir Emre Buğdaycı. “Nutrient Content and in Vitro Digestibility of Kermes Oak (Quercus Coccifera L.) Growing in the Provincial Borders of Burdur”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67, sy. 1 (Aralık 2019): 95-100. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.615731.
EndNote Türel AO, Buğdaycı KE (01 Aralık 2019) Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) growing in the provincial borders of Burdur. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67 1 95–100.
IEEE A. O. Türel ve K. E. Buğdaycı, “Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) growing in the provincial borders of Burdur”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, c. 67, sy. 1, ss. 95–100, 2019, doi: 10.33988/auvfd.615731.
ISNAD Türel, Ali Osman - Buğdaycı, Kadir Emre. “Nutrient Content and in Vitro Digestibility of Kermes Oak (Quercus Coccifera L.) Growing in the Provincial Borders of Burdur”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67/1 (Aralık 2019), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.615731.
JAMA Türel AO, Buğdaycı KE. Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) growing in the provincial borders of Burdur. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019;67:95–100.
MLA Türel, Ali Osman ve Kadir Emre Buğdaycı. “Nutrient Content and in Vitro Digestibility of Kermes Oak (Quercus Coccifera L.) Growing in the Provincial Borders of Burdur”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 67, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 95-100, doi:10.33988/auvfd.615731.
Vancouver Türel AO, Buğdaycı KE. Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) growing in the provincial borders of Burdur. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019;67(1):95-100.

Cited By

The Relationship Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) and Forage Value of Rubus Species Collected from Türkiye’s Flora
Sustainability
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219278
Comparative chemical composition of two Quercus species seeds growing in Tunisia
South African Journal of Botany
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.10.003
Unraveling the Effect of Dehulling Methods on the Nutritional Composition of Acorn Quercus spp.
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104354
İn Vitro Gaz Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Yer bademi (Cyperus esculentus) Çeşitlerinin Besin Değerinin Saptanması
Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.830704