Editöre Mektup
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

İneklerde farklı dozlarda PGF2a uygulamalarının ve östrus belirleme yöntemlerinin gebelik oranlarına etkisi

Yıl 2003, Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2, 91 - 96, 01.06.2003

Abdurrahman Özlüer M. Rıfat Salmanoğlu

https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235

Öz

Bu çalı~mada, sütçü ineklerde farklı dozlarda PGF2()( uygulamalarınınve östrus belirleme yöntemleriningebelik oranlarına etkisi belirlenmeyeçalışıldı. Çalışmada postpartum35 günü tamamlamış,en az bir östrtlS göstermiş, sağlıklı 45 Holstein inekkullanıldı. İnekler IYerli 3 gruba ayrıldı. Günlük muayenelerderasonografi kullanıldı. Grup I'e ovaryum üzerinde olgun bir korpus luteum (KL) ve dominant follikül (DF) belirlendiği siklusun herhangi bir gününde tek doz PGF2()(uygulandı. Grup II'ye östrtlS siklusunun 7. gününde 7 saat arayla iki doz PGF2()(enjeksiyonuyapıldı. Grup III' deki (kontrolgrubu) inekler siklusunaktivite ölçer (EAÖ) ve rektal palpasyon/ultrasonografirekıovaginalyolla tohumlamataglandin uygulananovulatorik follikülLin çapı ile östrus belirleme yöntemleri arasında bir ilişkinin olmadığı görüldü. Rektal palpasyon/USGöslrus sapıanmasıaçısından en uygun yöntem olduğu görüldü(%i00). Diğer 2 yöntemin, RP/USG yöntemine yardımcı olarak kullanılabileceğidüşünülmektedir.yöntemlerinin gebelik oranlarının artınımasında

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gebelik oranları östrus belirlenmesi prostaglandinF2()( senkronizasyon sütçü inekler

Kaynakça

  • i. Alaçam E (1997)Dişi Üreme Organlarının Muayenesi. 45
  • In: E. Alaçam (Ed.), Evcil Hayvanlarda Doğum ve İn- fertilite. Medisan, Ankara. Boyd JS, Omran SN (1991)Diagnostic ultrasonography of the hovine female reproductive tract.In practice, May, 119.
  • Frieke P (2002)Factors influencing pregnancy rate of lac- tating dairy cows.(http://www.wisc.edu/dysciluwexlrep_phys/ pubs/pregtate). Erişim tarihi: 11.6.2002. Garverick HA, zoııers WG, Smith MF (1992)Mec- hanism associated with corpus luteum lifespan in animals having normal and suhnormal rod Sci, 28, 11i-i24.
  • Grant E (2002)The heaı is on. Accurateheat detection- the key to a successful css.org/education/heatdetect.) Erişim tarihi: 11.6.2002. AI program. (http://www.naab
  • Hinkeldey JA, Hopkins S (1996)Using ultrasonography of hovine reproduction.ISD Yeterinarian, 58, 23-30.
  • Kahn W, Leidl W (1985)Sonographische Befunde am
  • Uterus von Stuten mit Ultraschall hei einer Fequens von 5 Megahertz (MHz).Pferdeheilkunde, 1,239-246. Kastelie Jp (1994)Understanding ovarian follicular de- velopment in caule.Yet Med, Jamıary, 64-7I.
  • Kastelie Jp, Knopf L, Ginther OJ (1990)Effect of day of prostaglandin F2-alpha treatment on selection and de- velopment of the ovulatory folliele in heifers.Anim Reprad Sci,23,169-180. iO.Lawrence S (2002)It pays to hreed twice aday (http:// www.dairypower.com/mydairy/print.php?story=33).Erişim tarihi:i i.6.2002.
  • Mee JF, Fahey J, Crilly J (2002)Breeding the dairy cow of the future- today's publications/ndci999/paper2.htm).Erişim tarihi:i1.6.2002. (http://www.teagasc.ie/
  • Mialot Jp, Laumonnier G, Ponsart C, Fauxpoint H, Ba- rassin E, Ponter AA, Deletang F (1999)Postpartumsu- hestrus in dairy cows: comparison of treatment with pros- taglandin F2 alpha or GnRH+prostaglandin F2 alpha +
  • GnRH.Theriogenology, 52, 901-9 11. Momeilovie D, Arehbald LF, Walters A, Tran T, Kel- bert D, Riseo C, Thateher WW (1998)Reproductive per- j'rırmance of lactating dairy cows treatedwith gonadot- rophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and/or prostaglandin
  • F2a (PGF2a) for synchronization Theriogenology,50, 1131-1139. of estrus and ovulation. t
  • Abdurrahman Özlü er - M. Rıfat Salmanoğlu Noakes D (1985) Pregnancy diagnosis in cattle. In Prac- tice. March, 46-51. O'Connor ML (1992) Artiflcial insemination technique.
  • (h tıp://www.inform.umd.edu/EdResrropic/AgrEnv/ndd/ reproducl). Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2002. O'Connor vice.
  • (http://www .inform.umd.edu/EdResrropic/ AgrEnv/ ndd/reprodue/). Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2002. O'Connor ML (1992) Reviewing artificial insemination lechnique.(http://www.infonn.umd.edu/EdResffopic/AgrEnv/ ndd/reproduc/). Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2002. O'Connor ML(1993) in cattle. infollicular de- velopment
  • Topic/AgrEnv/ndd/reproduc/]. Erişim tarihi: 11.02.2000.
  • Pieterse MC, Taverne MAM, Kruip AM, WilIiemse AH Detection(Jtcorpora lutea and follides (1990) incows: a cumparison pulpaıion. Yet Rec, 2, 552-554. ultrasonography and rec.tal of the Non-pregnant Cow. 268-275.In: RS Youngquist riogenology. WB Saıınders Company, Philadelphia. (~tlactating dairy cowswith pro.JtaglandinF2 alpha: insemination onobserved oestrus ve}us timed ar- tificial insemination.
  • J Yet Med A PhysiolPathal Clin Med., 47, 577-584. i Geliş tarihi: 24.7.2002iKabul tarihi: 18.9.2002

The effects of different doses of PGF2a administrations and estrous detection methods on pregnancy rates in cows

Yıl 2003, Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2, 91 - 96, 01.06.2003

Abdurrahman Özlüer M. Rıfat Salmanoğlu

https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235

Öz

Theaim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different PGF2()(,regimens and estrous detection techniques onthe pregnancy rates in cows. In the study, 45 healthy cows which had completed a postparturientlcast one detectable estrous were used as the materia . Cows were divided into 3 groups each consisting of 15 cows randomly. A 6-8MI-/z. multiple frequenceprobe attached, B Mode Rea -time ultrasonographydone to the cows having a matllre corpus luteum and dominant fo IIicle at any time at the cycle. Contrary, two PGF2()(injeetions weremade on day 7 of the estrous cycle with a 7 hours interva in Group II. Group III (control group) only detections were made withoutany hormone trcatmentsfrom dayi7 and on. Estrous detections were conductedtrumenls and RP/USG techniques in all groups. All estrous detected cows were artificially inseminated af ter i2 hours. Pregnancy esıimalİons were done with USG after 3 weeks and rectal palpationafter 40 days. As a result, no significantdifferences ..in preovu laloric follicle diameters were observed between PG treated groups and control s (p=0,08 I). Any relations between the diameterof the preovulatoricdetecıion was found lo be RP/USG methods(%j00) and it eould be advised to use the other two techniques combined with the formel", for ıhis manner. Pregnancyrates did not differ in both 3 groups. Thereby, neilher the hormonc treatmentsnor the estrous detection teehniques are found to be effective on pregnaney rates

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dairy cows estrous deteetion pregnancy rates prostaglandinF2()( synchronization

Kaynakça

  • i. Alaçam E (1997)Dişi Üreme Organlarının Muayenesi. 45
  • In: E. Alaçam (Ed.), Evcil Hayvanlarda Doğum ve İn- fertilite. Medisan, Ankara. Boyd JS, Omran SN (1991)Diagnostic ultrasonography of the hovine female reproductive tract.In practice, May, 119.
  • Frieke P (2002)Factors influencing pregnancy rate of lac- tating dairy cows.(http://www.wisc.edu/dysciluwexlrep_phys/ pubs/pregtate). Erişim tarihi: 11.6.2002. Garverick HA, zoııers WG, Smith MF (1992)Mec- hanism associated with corpus luteum lifespan in animals having normal and suhnormal rod Sci, 28, 11i-i24.
  • Grant E (2002)The heaı is on. Accurateheat detection- the key to a successful css.org/education/heatdetect.) Erişim tarihi: 11.6.2002. AI program. (http://www.naab
  • Hinkeldey JA, Hopkins S (1996)Using ultrasonography of hovine reproduction.ISD Yeterinarian, 58, 23-30.
  • Kahn W, Leidl W (1985)Sonographische Befunde am
  • Uterus von Stuten mit Ultraschall hei einer Fequens von 5 Megahertz (MHz).Pferdeheilkunde, 1,239-246. Kastelie Jp (1994)Understanding ovarian follicular de- velopment in caule.Yet Med, Jamıary, 64-7I.
  • Kastelie Jp, Knopf L, Ginther OJ (1990)Effect of day of prostaglandin F2-alpha treatment on selection and de- velopment of the ovulatory folliele in heifers.Anim Reprad Sci,23,169-180. iO.Lawrence S (2002)It pays to hreed twice aday (http:// www.dairypower.com/mydairy/print.php?story=33).Erişim tarihi:i i.6.2002.
  • Mee JF, Fahey J, Crilly J (2002)Breeding the dairy cow of the future- today's publications/ndci999/paper2.htm).Erişim tarihi:i1.6.2002. (http://www.teagasc.ie/
  • Mialot Jp, Laumonnier G, Ponsart C, Fauxpoint H, Ba- rassin E, Ponter AA, Deletang F (1999)Postpartumsu- hestrus in dairy cows: comparison of treatment with pros- taglandin F2 alpha or GnRH+prostaglandin F2 alpha +
  • GnRH.Theriogenology, 52, 901-9 11. Momeilovie D, Arehbald LF, Walters A, Tran T, Kel- bert D, Riseo C, Thateher WW (1998)Reproductive per- j'rırmance of lactating dairy cows treatedwith gonadot- rophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and/or prostaglandin
  • F2a (PGF2a) for synchronization Theriogenology,50, 1131-1139. of estrus and ovulation. t
  • Abdurrahman Özlü er - M. Rıfat Salmanoğlu Noakes D (1985) Pregnancy diagnosis in cattle. In Prac- tice. March, 46-51. O'Connor ML (1992) Artiflcial insemination technique.
  • (h tıp://www.inform.umd.edu/EdResrropic/AgrEnv/ndd/ reproducl). Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2002. O'Connor vice.
  • (http://www .inform.umd.edu/EdResrropic/ AgrEnv/ ndd/reprodue/). Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2002. O'Connor ML (1992) Reviewing artificial insemination lechnique.(http://www.infonn.umd.edu/EdResffopic/AgrEnv/ ndd/reproduc/). Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2002. O'Connor ML(1993) in cattle. infollicular de- velopment
  • Topic/AgrEnv/ndd/reproduc/]. Erişim tarihi: 11.02.2000.
  • Pieterse MC, Taverne MAM, Kruip AM, WilIiemse AH Detection(Jtcorpora lutea and follides (1990) incows: a cumparison pulpaıion. Yet Rec, 2, 552-554. ultrasonography and rec.tal of the Non-pregnant Cow. 268-275.In: RS Youngquist riogenology. WB Saıınders Company, Philadelphia. (~tlactating dairy cowswith pro.JtaglandinF2 alpha: insemination onobserved oestrus ve}us timed ar- tificial insemination.
  • J Yet Med A PhysiolPathal Clin Med., 47, 577-584. i Geliş tarihi: 24.7.2002iKabul tarihi: 18.9.2002
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Veteriner Cerrahi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Abdurrahman Özlüer

M. Rıfat Salmanoğlu

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2003
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2003Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Özlüer, A., & Salmanoğlu, M. R. (2003). The effects of different doses of PGF2a administrations and estrous detection methods on pregnancy rates in cows. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 50(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235
AMA Özlüer A, Salmanoğlu MR. The effects of different doses of PGF2a administrations and estrous detection methods on pregnancy rates in cows. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. Haziran 2003;50(2):91-96. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235
Chicago Özlüer, Abdurrahman, ve M. Rıfat Salmanoğlu. “The Effects of Different Doses of PGF2a Administrations and Estrous Detection Methods on Pregnancy Rates in Cows”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 50, sy. 2 (Haziran 2003): 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235.
EndNote Özlüer A, Salmanoğlu MR (01 Haziran 2003) The effects of different doses of PGF2a administrations and estrous detection methods on pregnancy rates in cows. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 50 2 91–96.
IEEE A. Özlüer ve M. R. Salmanoğlu, “The effects of different doses of PGF2a administrations and estrous detection methods on pregnancy rates in cows”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, c. 50, sy. 2, ss. 91–96, 2003, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235.
ISNAD Özlüer, Abdurrahman - Salmanoğlu, M. Rıfat. “The Effects of Different Doses of PGF2a Administrations and Estrous Detection Methods on Pregnancy Rates in Cows”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 50/2 (Haziran 2003), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235.
JAMA Özlüer A, Salmanoğlu MR. The effects of different doses of PGF2a administrations and estrous detection methods on pregnancy rates in cows. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2003;50:91–96.
MLA Özlüer, Abdurrahman ve M. Rıfat Salmanoğlu. “The Effects of Different Doses of PGF2a Administrations and Estrous Detection Methods on Pregnancy Rates in Cows”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 50, sy. 2, 2003, ss. 91-96, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002235.
Vancouver Özlüer A, Salmanoğlu MR. The effects of different doses of PGF2a administrations and estrous detection methods on pregnancy rates in cows. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2003;50(2):91-6.