Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi
Araştırma Makalesi
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 66 Sayı: 4, 391 - 396, 09.09.2019

Serdar KAMANLI

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.575742

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Ahrabi O (2015): Heritabilities and genetic correlations for egg weight traits in Iranian fowl by multi trait and random regression models. Int J Adv Biol Biom Res, 3, 108–111.
  • 2. Anang A, Mielenz N, Schüler L (2000): Genetic and phenotypic parameters for monthly egg production in White Leghorn hens. J Anim Breed Genet, 117, 407-415.
  • 3. Anonymous (2019): Hy-Line commercial breeder management guide. https://www.hyline.com/userdocs/pages/BRN_PS_ENG.pdf. (1 May 2019).
  • 4. Anonymous (2019): Hy-Line management guide .https://www.hyline.com/UserDocs/Pages/BRN_COM_ENG.pdf. (1 May 2019).
  • 5. Anonymous (2019): Lohman commercial breeding management guide. https://www.hyline.com/userdocs/pages/BRN_PS_ENG.pdf. (1 May 2019).
  • 6. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, et al. (2007): GenABEL: an R package for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics, 23, 1294-1296.
  • 7. Besbes B, Ducrocq V, Foulley JL, et al. (1992): Estimation of genetic parameters of egg production traits of laying hens by restricted maximum likelihood applied to a multiple-trait reduced animal model. Genet Sel Evol, 24, 539-552.
  • 8. Besbes B, Gibson JP (1999): Genetic variation of egg production traits in purebred and crossbred laying hens. Anim Sci, 68, 433-439.
  • 9. Francesch A, Estany J, Alfonso L, et al. (1997): Genetic parameters for egg number, egg weight, and eggshell color in three Catalan poultry breeds. Poult Sci, 76, 1627-1631.
  • 10. Goger H, Demirtas S, Yurtogullari S (2014): Developments in the performance of brown egg layer parental stocks for superior hybrid. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 38, 546-551.
  • 11. Hoffmann I (2005): Research and investment in poultry genetic resources-challenges and option for sustainable use. World Poultry Sci J, 61, 57-70.
  • 12. Johansson K, Orberg J, Carlgren AB (1996): Selection for egg shell strength in laying hens using shell membrane characteristics. Br Poultry Sci, 37, 757-763.
  • 13. Kamali MA, Ghorbani SH, Sharbabak MM, et al. (2007): Heritabilities and genetic correlations of economic traits in Iranian native fowl and estimated genetic trend and inbreeding coefficients. Br Poultry Sci, 48, 443-448.
  • 14. Kumar R, Kalra S, Singh S (2013): Genetic and phenotypic parameters of economic traits in White Leghorn. Ind J Anim Res, 47, 132-136.
  • 15. Kumari P B, Gupta BR, Prakash MG, et al. (2009): Genetic study on body weights of Japanese quails. Int J Poult Sci, 44, 301-307.
  • 16. Lillpers K, Wilhelmson M (1993): Age-dependent changes in oviposition pattern and egg production traits in the domestic hen. Poult Sci, 72, 2005-2011.
  • 17. Lwelamira J, Kifaro G, Gwakisa P (2009): Genetic parameters for body weights, egg traits and antibody response against Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) vaccine among two Tanzania chicken ecotypes. Trop Anim Health Prod, 41, 51-59.
  • 18. Mızrak C, Boga A, Durmus I, et al. (2010): Various production characteristics of white layer breeders developed in the Poultry Research Institute. J Poult Res, 9, 5-10.
  • 19. Narinc D, Aksoy T, Kaplan S (2016): Effects of multi-trait selection on phenotypic and genetic changes in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica), J Poult Sci, 53, 103-110.
  • 20. Narinc D, Karaman E, Aksoy T (2014): Effects of slaughter age and mass selection on slaughter and carcass characteristics in 2 lines of Japanese quail. Poult Sci, 93, 762-769.
  • 21. Niknafs S, Nejati-Javaremi A, Mehrabani-Yeganeh H, et al. (2012): Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight and egg production traits in Mazandaran native chicken. Trop Anim Health Prod, 44, 1437-1443.
  • 22. Padhi MK, Chatterjee RN, Rajkumar U, et al. (2015): Genetic and phenotypic parameters estimates for body weight, conformation, production and reproduction traits of PD1 (Vanaraja male line) during different periods. Ind J of Anim Sci, 85, 883-888.
  • 23. Peebles ED, Gardner CW, Brake J, et al. (2000): Albumen height and yolk and embryo compositions in broiler hatching eggs during incubation. Poult Sci, 79, 1373-1377.
  • 24. Preisinger R, Savas T (1997): Vergleich zweier Methoden zur Schätzung der Varianzkomponenten für Leistungmerkmale bei Legehennen. Züchtungskunde, 69, 142-152.
  • 25. Quinton M (2003): Use of mixed model methodology in poultry breeding: Assumptions, limitations and concerns of BLUP-based selection programmes. 203-235. In, Muir WM, Aggrey SE (Eds): Poultry Genetics, Breeding Biotechnology. CAB Int, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • 26. Rayan GN, Galal A, Fathi MM, et al. (2010): Impact of layer breeder flock age and strain on mechanical and ultra structural properties of eggshell in chicken. Int J Poult Sci, 9, 139-147.
  • 27. Roberts JR, Chousalkar K, Samiullah S (2013): Egg quality and age of laying hens: implications for product safety. Anim Prod Sci, 53, 1291-1297.
  • 28. Samiullah S, Roberts JR (2013): The location of protoporphyrin in the eggshell of brown-shelled eggs. Poult Sci, 92, 2783-2788.
  • 29. Savas TR, Preisinger R, Roehe E, et al. (1999): Effect of inbreeding on production traits and their genetic parameters in laying hens. Arch Geflügelkd, 63, 246-251.
  • 30. Savegnago RP, Buzanskas ME, Nunes BN, et al. (2011): Heritabilities and genetic correlations for reproductive traits in an F2 reciprocal cross chicken population. Genet Mol Res, 10, 1337-1344.
  • 31. Singh CB, Singh CV, Dev C (2011): Production performance of native fowl of Garhwal Himalayas reared under deep litter system. Ind J Poul Sci, 46, 119-120.
  • 32. Szwaczkowski T (2003): Use of mixed model methodology in poultry breeding: Estimation of genetic parameters. 165-201. In, Muir WM, Aggrey SE (Eds): Poultry Genetics Breeding and Biotechnology, CAB Int, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • 33. Thiruvenkadan A, Panneerselvam S, Prabakaran R (2010): Layer breeding strategies: an overview. World Poultry Sci J, 66, 477-501.
  • 34. Thiruvenkadan A, Prabakaran R (2017): Recent approaches in poultry breeding. Appro Poult Dairy & Vet Sci, 2, APDV.000533, 2017. DOI: 10.31031/APDV.2017.02.000533
  • 35. Veeramani P, Churchil R, Kutty KN (2012): Estimates of heritability and correlations of economic traits in two strains of White Leghorn. Int J Vet Sci, 1, 45-48.
  • 36. Venturini GC, Grossi DA, Ramos SB, et al. (2012): Estimation of genetic parameters for partial egg production periods by means of random regression models. Genet Mol Res, 11, 1819-1829.
  • 37. Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, et al. (2011): Evaluation of egg production in layers using random regression models. Poult Sci, 90, 30-34.
  • 38. Wolc A, Szwaczkowski T (2009): Estimation of genetic parameters for monthly egg production in laying hens based on random regression models. J Appl Genet, 50, 41-46.
  • 39. Zhang LC, Ning ZH, Xu GY, et al. (2010): Heritability and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in Bovan-Egg duarf layers. Poult Sci, 84, 1209-1213.

Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 66 Sayı: 4, 391 - 396, 09.09.2019

Serdar KAMANLI

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.575742

Öz

This study was conducted to
determine the genetic correlation and heritability for age at sexual maturity,
body weight at sexual maturity, egg yield, egg weight, egg shape index and L*,
a*, b* values of egg shell in a Barred Rock line was applied selection. For
this aim, a total of 1622 pedigreed Barred Rocks were selected. The present
estimated heritability values for investigated traits were found between
moderate-to-high. However, the heritability of egg yield, eggshell color and
body weight at sexual maturity were found lower than those of other traits. It
was calculated positive correlations among monthly egg yields, especially
between egg yield at the second month with total egg yield. As a conclusion,
selection studies did not cause much decrease in genetic variation of studied
traits, except for egg yield and body weight at sexual maturity. Monthly egg
yield data can be used selection studies. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Genetic correlation, heritability, layer breeder, performance traits

Kaynakça

  • 1. Ahrabi O (2015): Heritabilities and genetic correlations for egg weight traits in Iranian fowl by multi trait and random regression models. Int J Adv Biol Biom Res, 3, 108–111.
  • 2. Anang A, Mielenz N, Schüler L (2000): Genetic and phenotypic parameters for monthly egg production in White Leghorn hens. J Anim Breed Genet, 117, 407-415.
  • 3. Anonymous (2019): Hy-Line commercial breeder management guide. https://www.hyline.com/userdocs/pages/BRN_PS_ENG.pdf. (1 May 2019).
  • 4. Anonymous (2019): Hy-Line management guide .https://www.hyline.com/UserDocs/Pages/BRN_COM_ENG.pdf. (1 May 2019).
  • 5. Anonymous (2019): Lohman commercial breeding management guide. https://www.hyline.com/userdocs/pages/BRN_PS_ENG.pdf. (1 May 2019).
  • 6. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, et al. (2007): GenABEL: an R package for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics, 23, 1294-1296.
  • 7. Besbes B, Ducrocq V, Foulley JL, et al. (1992): Estimation of genetic parameters of egg production traits of laying hens by restricted maximum likelihood applied to a multiple-trait reduced animal model. Genet Sel Evol, 24, 539-552.
  • 8. Besbes B, Gibson JP (1999): Genetic variation of egg production traits in purebred and crossbred laying hens. Anim Sci, 68, 433-439.
  • 9. Francesch A, Estany J, Alfonso L, et al. (1997): Genetic parameters for egg number, egg weight, and eggshell color in three Catalan poultry breeds. Poult Sci, 76, 1627-1631.
  • 10. Goger H, Demirtas S, Yurtogullari S (2014): Developments in the performance of brown egg layer parental stocks for superior hybrid. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 38, 546-551.
  • 11. Hoffmann I (2005): Research and investment in poultry genetic resources-challenges and option for sustainable use. World Poultry Sci J, 61, 57-70.
  • 12. Johansson K, Orberg J, Carlgren AB (1996): Selection for egg shell strength in laying hens using shell membrane characteristics. Br Poultry Sci, 37, 757-763.
  • 13. Kamali MA, Ghorbani SH, Sharbabak MM, et al. (2007): Heritabilities and genetic correlations of economic traits in Iranian native fowl and estimated genetic trend and inbreeding coefficients. Br Poultry Sci, 48, 443-448.
  • 14. Kumar R, Kalra S, Singh S (2013): Genetic and phenotypic parameters of economic traits in White Leghorn. Ind J Anim Res, 47, 132-136.
  • 15. Kumari P B, Gupta BR, Prakash MG, et al. (2009): Genetic study on body weights of Japanese quails. Int J Poult Sci, 44, 301-307.
  • 16. Lillpers K, Wilhelmson M (1993): Age-dependent changes in oviposition pattern and egg production traits in the domestic hen. Poult Sci, 72, 2005-2011.
  • 17. Lwelamira J, Kifaro G, Gwakisa P (2009): Genetic parameters for body weights, egg traits and antibody response against Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) vaccine among two Tanzania chicken ecotypes. Trop Anim Health Prod, 41, 51-59.
  • 18. Mızrak C, Boga A, Durmus I, et al. (2010): Various production characteristics of white layer breeders developed in the Poultry Research Institute. J Poult Res, 9, 5-10.
  • 19. Narinc D, Aksoy T, Kaplan S (2016): Effects of multi-trait selection on phenotypic and genetic changes in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica), J Poult Sci, 53, 103-110.
  • 20. Narinc D, Karaman E, Aksoy T (2014): Effects of slaughter age and mass selection on slaughter and carcass characteristics in 2 lines of Japanese quail. Poult Sci, 93, 762-769.
  • 21. Niknafs S, Nejati-Javaremi A, Mehrabani-Yeganeh H, et al. (2012): Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight and egg production traits in Mazandaran native chicken. Trop Anim Health Prod, 44, 1437-1443.
  • 22. Padhi MK, Chatterjee RN, Rajkumar U, et al. (2015): Genetic and phenotypic parameters estimates for body weight, conformation, production and reproduction traits of PD1 (Vanaraja male line) during different periods. Ind J of Anim Sci, 85, 883-888.
  • 23. Peebles ED, Gardner CW, Brake J, et al. (2000): Albumen height and yolk and embryo compositions in broiler hatching eggs during incubation. Poult Sci, 79, 1373-1377.
  • 24. Preisinger R, Savas T (1997): Vergleich zweier Methoden zur Schätzung der Varianzkomponenten für Leistungmerkmale bei Legehennen. Züchtungskunde, 69, 142-152.
  • 25. Quinton M (2003): Use of mixed model methodology in poultry breeding: Assumptions, limitations and concerns of BLUP-based selection programmes. 203-235. In, Muir WM, Aggrey SE (Eds): Poultry Genetics, Breeding Biotechnology. CAB Int, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • 26. Rayan GN, Galal A, Fathi MM, et al. (2010): Impact of layer breeder flock age and strain on mechanical and ultra structural properties of eggshell in chicken. Int J Poult Sci, 9, 139-147.
  • 27. Roberts JR, Chousalkar K, Samiullah S (2013): Egg quality and age of laying hens: implications for product safety. Anim Prod Sci, 53, 1291-1297.
  • 28. Samiullah S, Roberts JR (2013): The location of protoporphyrin in the eggshell of brown-shelled eggs. Poult Sci, 92, 2783-2788.
  • 29. Savas TR, Preisinger R, Roehe E, et al. (1999): Effect of inbreeding on production traits and their genetic parameters in laying hens. Arch Geflügelkd, 63, 246-251.
  • 30. Savegnago RP, Buzanskas ME, Nunes BN, et al. (2011): Heritabilities and genetic correlations for reproductive traits in an F2 reciprocal cross chicken population. Genet Mol Res, 10, 1337-1344.
  • 31. Singh CB, Singh CV, Dev C (2011): Production performance of native fowl of Garhwal Himalayas reared under deep litter system. Ind J Poul Sci, 46, 119-120.
  • 32. Szwaczkowski T (2003): Use of mixed model methodology in poultry breeding: Estimation of genetic parameters. 165-201. In, Muir WM, Aggrey SE (Eds): Poultry Genetics Breeding and Biotechnology, CAB Int, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • 33. Thiruvenkadan A, Panneerselvam S, Prabakaran R (2010): Layer breeding strategies: an overview. World Poultry Sci J, 66, 477-501.
  • 34. Thiruvenkadan A, Prabakaran R (2017): Recent approaches in poultry breeding. Appro Poult Dairy & Vet Sci, 2, APDV.000533, 2017. DOI: 10.31031/APDV.2017.02.000533
  • 35. Veeramani P, Churchil R, Kutty KN (2012): Estimates of heritability and correlations of economic traits in two strains of White Leghorn. Int J Vet Sci, 1, 45-48.
  • 36. Venturini GC, Grossi DA, Ramos SB, et al. (2012): Estimation of genetic parameters for partial egg production periods by means of random regression models. Genet Mol Res, 11, 1819-1829.
  • 37. Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, et al. (2011): Evaluation of egg production in layers using random regression models. Poult Sci, 90, 30-34.
  • 38. Wolc A, Szwaczkowski T (2009): Estimation of genetic parameters for monthly egg production in laying hens based on random regression models. J Appl Genet, 50, 41-46.
  • 39. Zhang LC, Ning ZH, Xu GY, et al. (2010): Heritability and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in Bovan-Egg duarf layers. Poult Sci, 84, 1209-1213.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Veteriner Cerrahi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Serdar KAMANLI

0000-0003-1936-7550
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi 9 Eylül 2019
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019Cilt: 66 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { auvfd575742, journal = {Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1300-0861}, eissn = {1308-2817}, address = {}, publisher = {Ankara Üniversitesi}, year = {2019}, volume = {66}, number = {4}, pages = {391 - 396}, doi = {10.33988/auvfd.575742}, title = {Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line}, key = {cite}, author = {Kamanlı, Serdar} }
APA Kamanlı, S. (2019). Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi , 66 (4) , 391-396 . DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.575742
MLA Kamanlı, S. "Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line" . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66 (2019 ): 391-396 <http://vetjournal.ankara.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/47708/575742>
Chicago Kamanlı, S. "Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66 (2019 ): 391-396
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line AU - SerdarKamanlı Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.575742 DO - 10.33988/auvfd.575742 T2 - Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 391 EP - 396 VL - 66 IS - 4 SN - 1300-0861-1308-2817 M3 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.575742 UR - https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.575742 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line %A Serdar Kamanlı %T Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line %D 2019 %J Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1300-0861-1308-2817 %V 66 %N 4 %R doi: 10.33988/auvfd.575742 %U 10.33988/auvfd.575742
ISNAD Kamanlı, Serdar . "Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66 / 4 (Eylül 2019): 391-396 . https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.575742
AMA Kamanlı S. Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019; 66(4): 391-396.
Vancouver Kamanlı S. Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 66(4): 391-396.
IEEE S. Kamanlı , "Estimation of genetic parameters for some performance traits in a selected Barred Rock line", Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 66, sayı. 4, ss. 391-396, Eyl. 2019, doi:10.33988/auvfd.575742