Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi
Derleme
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 66 Sayı: 4, 423 - 428, 09.09.2019

Renata RELİĆ Evangelia SOSSİDOU Anna DEDOUSİ Lidija PERİĆ İvana BOŽİČKOVİĆ Mirjana ĐUKİĆ-STOJČİĆ

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Appleby MC, Mendi JA, Barry OH (2004): Behaviour, Causes and effects. In: Poultry behaviour and welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK. 2. Avcılar ÖV, Kocakaya A, Onbaşılar EE, et al (2018): Influence of sepiolite additions to different litter materials on performance and some welfare parameters of broilers and litter characteristics. Poultry Sci, 97, 3085-3091.
  • 3. Blokhuis H J (1986): Feather pecking in poultry: Its relation with ground pecking. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 16, 63–67.
  • 4. Breed MD, Moore J (2012): Homeostasis and Time Budgets, 99-123. In: Animal Behavior, Elsevier.
  • 5. Bullis KL, Snoeyenbos GH, Roekel HV (1950): A keratoconjunctivitis in chickens. Poult Sci, 329, 386–389.
  • 6. Campbell DLM, Goodwin SL, Makagon MM, et al (2016): Failed landings after laying hen flight in a commercial aviary over two flock cycles. Poult Sci, 95:188–97.
  • 7. Chen BL, Haith KL, Mullens BA (2011): Beak condition drives abundance and grooming-mediated competitive asymmetry in a poultry ectoparasite community. Parasitology, 138, 748-757.
  • 8. Daigle CL (2017): Chapter 11 - Controlling Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Egg Laying Flocks. In: Patricia Hester (ed.) Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • 9. David B, Oppermann Moe R, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust. Animals, 5, 495-511.
  • 10. David B, Mejdell C, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part II—Ammonia. Animals, 5, 886-896.
  • 11. DEFRA (2002): Code of recommendations for the welfare of livestock: meat chickens and breeding chickens, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. DEFRA Publications, London.
  • 12. de Goede D, Gremmen B, Rodenburg BT, et al (2013): Reducing damaging behaviour in robust livestock farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 46-53.
  • 13. de Jong I, Berg C, Butterworth A, et al. (2012): Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders. EFSA, Supporting Publications 2012: EN-295.
  • 14. Dinev I, Denev S, Vashin I, et al (2019): Pathomorphological investigations on the prevalence of contact dermatitis lesions in broiler chickens, J Appl Anim Res, 47, 129-134.
  • 15. Drake KA, Donnelly CA, Stamp Dawkins M (2010): Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 51, 725-733.
  • 16. Đukić Stojčić M, Perić L, Relić R, et al (2017): Keel bone damage in laying hens reared in different production systems in Serbia. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 33(4), 487-492.
  • 17. Duncan IJH (1998): Behavior and Behavioral Needs. Poult Sci, 77, 1766–1772.
  • 18. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1971): Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 19, 500–504.
  • 19. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972): Thwarting of feeding behavior in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 444–451.
  • 20. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972a): An analysis of displacement preening in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 68–71.
  • 21. European Commission (EC) (1999): Council directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999. Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities L, 203, 53-57.
  • 22. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2005): The welfare aspects of various systems of keeping laying hens. The EFSA Journal, 197, 1-23.
  • 23. El-Deek A, El-Sabrout K (2019): Behaviour and meat quality of chicken under different housing systems. World Poultry Sci J, 75, 105-114.
  • 24. Ekesbo I (2011): Domestic Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). In: Farm Animal Behaviour: Characteristics for Assessment of Health and Welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK.
  • 25. Estevez I (2007): Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poult Sci, 86, 1265–1272.
  • 26. Freire R, Eastwood MA, Joyce M (2011): Minor beak trimming in chickens leads to loss of mechanoreception and magnetoreception. J Anim Sci, 89, 1201–1206.
  • 27. Gilani AM, Knowles TG, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 148, 54– 63.
  • 28. Gonçalves S, Ferreira R, Pereira I, et al (2017): Behavioral and physiological responses of different genetic lines of free-range broiler raised on a semi-intensive system. J Anim Behav Biometeorol, 5, 112-117.
  • 29. Harlander-Matauschek A, Rodenburg TB, Sandilands V, et al (2015): Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens. Worlds Poult Sci J, 71, 461-472.
  • 30. Herkens JLT, Delezie E, Rodenburg TB, et al (2016): Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. Poult Sci, 95, 482-488.
  • 31. LeBlanc S, Tobalske B, Quinton M, et al (2016): Physical Health Problems and Environmental Challenges Influence Balancing Behaviour in Laying Hens. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0153477.
  • 32. Nasr MAF, Murrell J, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 54, 165-170.
  • 33. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Çetin S (2008): Effects of breeder age and stocking density on performance, carcass characteristics and some stres parameters of broilers, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 21, 262 – 269.
  • 34. Onbaşılar EE, Erol H, Cantekin Z, et al (2007): Influence of intermittent lighting on broiler performance, incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia, tonic immobility, some blood parameters and antibody production, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 20, 550 – 555.
  • 35. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Erdem E, et al (2008): Influence of lighting periods and stocking densities on performance, carcass characteristics and some stress parameters in broilers. Arch Geflügelk, 72, 193-200.
  • 36. Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, et al (2015): Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages, Poult Sci, 94, 559-564.
  • 37. Onbaşılar EE, Erdem E, Ünal N, et al (2016): Comparison of liver and bone health of two laying hen strains kept in different cage systems. Europ Poult Sci, 80, 1-9.
  • 38. Riber AB, Casey-Trott TM, Herskin MS (2018): The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens. Front Vet Sci, 5, 6.
  • 39. Rodenburg TB., Tuyttens FAM, De Reu K, et al (2008): Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: An on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare, 17, 363–373.
  • 40. Rodenburg TB, Van Krimpen MM, De Jong IC, et al (2013): The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World Poultry Sci J, 69, 361-374.
  • 41. Sandilands V, Moinard C, Sparks NHC (2009): Providing laying hens with perches: Fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? Br Poult Sci, 4, 395–406.
  • 42. SCAHAW (2000): The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium.
  • 43. Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD (2010): Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult Sci, 89, 2043–2051.
  • 44. Shields S, Greger M (2013): Animal Welfare and Food Safety Aspects of Confining Broiler Chickens to Cages. Animals (Basel), 3, 386–400.
  • 45. Şimşek ÜG, Baykalir Y, Erişir M, et al (2018): Effects of conventional and organic rearing systems and hen age on oxidative stress parameters of blood and ovarian tissues in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 65, 85-91
  • 46. Sosnówka - Czajka E, Herbut E, Skomorucha I (2010): Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann Anim Sci, 10, 349–360.
  • 47. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Elson HA, et al (2011): Pasture-based system for poultry production: implications and perspectives. World Poultry Sci J, 67, 47-58.
  • 48. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, et al (2015): Effects of pasture management on poultry welfare and meat quality in organic poultry production systems. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 375-384.
  • 49. Stojcic MD, Bessei W (2009): The effect of locomotor activity and weight load on bone problems in fast and slow growing chickens. Arch Geflügelk, 73, 242-249.
  • 50. Vaarst M, Steenfeldt S, Horsted K (2015): Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 609-620.

Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 66 Sayı: 4, 423 - 428, 09.09.2019

Renata RELİĆ Evangelia SOSSİDOU Anna DEDOUSİ Lidija PERİĆ İvana BOŽİČKOVİĆ Mirjana ĐUKİĆ-STOJČİĆ

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496

Öz

This review paper aims to give an overview of the literature data on
common behavioral and health problems in broiler chickens and laying hens and
to explain their interrelation and relation to the rearing system. In the
initial part, the mechanism of arising of the most common forms of abnormal
behavior and the way they affect the poultry are briefly described.
Furthermore, the possibility of poultry to fulfill behavioral needs in
different rearing systems and some of the consequences to the birds in the case
of their inability to meet their needs are displayed. The influence of the main
microclimate and space factors is also discussed, as well as the occurrence of
some infectious, parasitic and production diseases in poultry rearing systems.
The welfare problems of poultry are complexes and most often caused by the system
design and its improper use. Continuous work on improving rearing systems is as
important as better informing the producers and the public on poultry welfare
problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Behavior, health, broilers, hens, rearing

Kaynakça

  • 1. Appleby MC, Mendi JA, Barry OH (2004): Behaviour, Causes and effects. In: Poultry behaviour and welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK. 2. Avcılar ÖV, Kocakaya A, Onbaşılar EE, et al (2018): Influence of sepiolite additions to different litter materials on performance and some welfare parameters of broilers and litter characteristics. Poultry Sci, 97, 3085-3091.
  • 3. Blokhuis H J (1986): Feather pecking in poultry: Its relation with ground pecking. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 16, 63–67.
  • 4. Breed MD, Moore J (2012): Homeostasis and Time Budgets, 99-123. In: Animal Behavior, Elsevier.
  • 5. Bullis KL, Snoeyenbos GH, Roekel HV (1950): A keratoconjunctivitis in chickens. Poult Sci, 329, 386–389.
  • 6. Campbell DLM, Goodwin SL, Makagon MM, et al (2016): Failed landings after laying hen flight in a commercial aviary over two flock cycles. Poult Sci, 95:188–97.
  • 7. Chen BL, Haith KL, Mullens BA (2011): Beak condition drives abundance and grooming-mediated competitive asymmetry in a poultry ectoparasite community. Parasitology, 138, 748-757.
  • 8. Daigle CL (2017): Chapter 11 - Controlling Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Egg Laying Flocks. In: Patricia Hester (ed.) Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • 9. David B, Oppermann Moe R, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust. Animals, 5, 495-511.
  • 10. David B, Mejdell C, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part II—Ammonia. Animals, 5, 886-896.
  • 11. DEFRA (2002): Code of recommendations for the welfare of livestock: meat chickens and breeding chickens, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. DEFRA Publications, London.
  • 12. de Goede D, Gremmen B, Rodenburg BT, et al (2013): Reducing damaging behaviour in robust livestock farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 46-53.
  • 13. de Jong I, Berg C, Butterworth A, et al. (2012): Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders. EFSA, Supporting Publications 2012: EN-295.
  • 14. Dinev I, Denev S, Vashin I, et al (2019): Pathomorphological investigations on the prevalence of contact dermatitis lesions in broiler chickens, J Appl Anim Res, 47, 129-134.
  • 15. Drake KA, Donnelly CA, Stamp Dawkins M (2010): Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 51, 725-733.
  • 16. Đukić Stojčić M, Perić L, Relić R, et al (2017): Keel bone damage in laying hens reared in different production systems in Serbia. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 33(4), 487-492.
  • 17. Duncan IJH (1998): Behavior and Behavioral Needs. Poult Sci, 77, 1766–1772.
  • 18. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1971): Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 19, 500–504.
  • 19. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972): Thwarting of feeding behavior in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 444–451.
  • 20. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972a): An analysis of displacement preening in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 68–71.
  • 21. European Commission (EC) (1999): Council directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999. Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities L, 203, 53-57.
  • 22. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2005): The welfare aspects of various systems of keeping laying hens. The EFSA Journal, 197, 1-23.
  • 23. El-Deek A, El-Sabrout K (2019): Behaviour and meat quality of chicken under different housing systems. World Poultry Sci J, 75, 105-114.
  • 24. Ekesbo I (2011): Domestic Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). In: Farm Animal Behaviour: Characteristics for Assessment of Health and Welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK.
  • 25. Estevez I (2007): Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poult Sci, 86, 1265–1272.
  • 26. Freire R, Eastwood MA, Joyce M (2011): Minor beak trimming in chickens leads to loss of mechanoreception and magnetoreception. J Anim Sci, 89, 1201–1206.
  • 27. Gilani AM, Knowles TG, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 148, 54– 63.
  • 28. Gonçalves S, Ferreira R, Pereira I, et al (2017): Behavioral and physiological responses of different genetic lines of free-range broiler raised on a semi-intensive system. J Anim Behav Biometeorol, 5, 112-117.
  • 29. Harlander-Matauschek A, Rodenburg TB, Sandilands V, et al (2015): Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens. Worlds Poult Sci J, 71, 461-472.
  • 30. Herkens JLT, Delezie E, Rodenburg TB, et al (2016): Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. Poult Sci, 95, 482-488.
  • 31. LeBlanc S, Tobalske B, Quinton M, et al (2016): Physical Health Problems and Environmental Challenges Influence Balancing Behaviour in Laying Hens. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0153477.
  • 32. Nasr MAF, Murrell J, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 54, 165-170.
  • 33. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Çetin S (2008): Effects of breeder age and stocking density on performance, carcass characteristics and some stres parameters of broilers, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 21, 262 – 269.
  • 34. Onbaşılar EE, Erol H, Cantekin Z, et al (2007): Influence of intermittent lighting on broiler performance, incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia, tonic immobility, some blood parameters and antibody production, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 20, 550 – 555.
  • 35. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Erdem E, et al (2008): Influence of lighting periods and stocking densities on performance, carcass characteristics and some stress parameters in broilers. Arch Geflügelk, 72, 193-200.
  • 36. Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, et al (2015): Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages, Poult Sci, 94, 559-564.
  • 37. Onbaşılar EE, Erdem E, Ünal N, et al (2016): Comparison of liver and bone health of two laying hen strains kept in different cage systems. Europ Poult Sci, 80, 1-9.
  • 38. Riber AB, Casey-Trott TM, Herskin MS (2018): The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens. Front Vet Sci, 5, 6.
  • 39. Rodenburg TB., Tuyttens FAM, De Reu K, et al (2008): Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: An on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare, 17, 363–373.
  • 40. Rodenburg TB, Van Krimpen MM, De Jong IC, et al (2013): The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World Poultry Sci J, 69, 361-374.
  • 41. Sandilands V, Moinard C, Sparks NHC (2009): Providing laying hens with perches: Fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? Br Poult Sci, 4, 395–406.
  • 42. SCAHAW (2000): The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium.
  • 43. Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD (2010): Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult Sci, 89, 2043–2051.
  • 44. Shields S, Greger M (2013): Animal Welfare and Food Safety Aspects of Confining Broiler Chickens to Cages. Animals (Basel), 3, 386–400.
  • 45. Şimşek ÜG, Baykalir Y, Erişir M, et al (2018): Effects of conventional and organic rearing systems and hen age on oxidative stress parameters of blood and ovarian tissues in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 65, 85-91
  • 46. Sosnówka - Czajka E, Herbut E, Skomorucha I (2010): Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann Anim Sci, 10, 349–360.
  • 47. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Elson HA, et al (2011): Pasture-based system for poultry production: implications and perspectives. World Poultry Sci J, 67, 47-58.
  • 48. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, et al (2015): Effects of pasture management on poultry welfare and meat quality in organic poultry production systems. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 375-384.
  • 49. Stojcic MD, Bessei W (2009): The effect of locomotor activity and weight load on bone problems in fast and slow growing chickens. Arch Geflügelk, 73, 242-249.
  • 50. Vaarst M, Steenfeldt S, Horsted K (2015): Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 609-620.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Veteriner Cerrahi
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Renata RELİĆ

0000-0001-5320-7863
Serbia

Evangelia SOSSİDOU

0000-0002-5716-0908
Greece

Anna DEDOUSİ

0000-0002-5399-9773
Greece

Lidija PERİĆ

0000-0002-2151-4516
Serbia

İvana BOŽİČKOVİĆ

0000-0001-6151-4273
Serbia

Mirjana ĐUKİĆ-STOJČİĆ

0000-0002-0784-3671
Serbia

Yayımlanma Tarihi 9 Eylül 2019
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019Cilt: 66 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @derleme { auvfd597496, journal = {Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1300-0861}, eissn = {1308-2817}, address = {}, publisher = {Ankara Üniversitesi}, year = {2019}, volume = {66}, number = {4}, pages = {423 - 428}, doi = {10.33988/auvfd.597496}, title = {Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems}, key = {cite}, author = {Relić, Renata and Sossidou, Evangelia and Dedousi, Anna and Perić, Lidija and Božičković, İvana and Đukić-stojčić, Mirjana} }
APA Relić, R. , Sossidou, E. , Dedousi, A. , Perić, L. , Božičković, İ. & Đukić-stojčić, M. (2019). Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi , 66 (4) , 423-428 . DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.597496
MLA Relić, R. , Sossidou, E. , Dedousi, A. , Perić, L. , Božičković, İ. , Đukić-stojčić, M. "Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems" . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66 (2019 ): 423-428 <http://vetjournal.ankara.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/47708/597496>
Chicago Relić, R. , Sossidou, E. , Dedousi, A. , Perić, L. , Božičković, İ. , Đukić-stojčić, M. "Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66 (2019 ): 423-428
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems AU - RenataRelić, EvangeliaSossidou, AnnaDedousi, LidijaPerić, İvanaBožičković, MirjanaĐukić-stojčić Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.597496 DO - 10.33988/auvfd.597496 T2 - Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 423 EP - 428 VL - 66 IS - 4 SN - 1300-0861-1308-2817 M3 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.597496 UR - https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems %A Renata Relić , Evangelia Sossidou , Anna Dedousi , Lidija Perić , İvana Božičković , Mirjana Đukić-stojčić %T Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems %D 2019 %J Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1300-0861-1308-2817 %V 66 %N 4 %R doi: 10.33988/auvfd.597496 %U 10.33988/auvfd.597496
ISNAD Relić, Renata , Sossidou, Evangelia , Dedousi, Anna , Perić, Lidija , Božičković, İvana , Đukić-stojčić, Mirjana . "Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66 / 4 (Eylül 2019): 423-428 . https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496
AMA Relić R. , Sossidou E. , Dedousi A. , Perić L. , Božičković İ. , Đukić-stojčić M. Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019; 66(4): 423-428.
Vancouver Relić R. , Sossidou E. , Dedousi A. , Perić L. , Božičković İ. , Đukić-stojčić M. Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 66(4): 423-428.
IEEE R. Relić , E. Sossidou , A. Dedousi , L. Perić , İ. Božičković ve M. Đukić-stojčić , "Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems", Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 66, sayı. 4, ss. 423-428, Eyl. 2019, doi:10.33988/auvfd.597496