Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems

Renata Relić; Evangelia Sossidou; Anna Dedousi; Lidija Perić; İvana Božičković; Mirjana đukić-stojčić

doi:10.33988/auvfd.597496

Review

Year 2019, Volume: 66 Issue: 4, 423 - 428, 09.09.2019

Renata Relić , Evangelia Sossidou Anna Dedousi Lidija Perić İvana Božičković Mirjana đukić-stojčić

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496

Cited By: 13

Abstract

References

1. Appleby MC, Mendi JA, Barry OH (2004): Behaviour, Causes and effects. In: Poultry behaviour and welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK. 2. Avcılar ÖV, Kocakaya A, Onbaşılar EE, et al (2018): Influence of sepiolite additions to different litter materials on performance and some welfare parameters of broilers and litter characteristics. Poultry Sci, 97, 3085-3091.
3. Blokhuis H J (1986): Feather pecking in poultry: Its relation with ground pecking. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 16, 63–67.
4. Breed MD, Moore J (2012): Homeostasis and Time Budgets, 99-123. In: Animal Behavior, Elsevier.
5. Bullis KL, Snoeyenbos GH, Roekel HV (1950): A keratoconjunctivitis in chickens. Poult Sci, 329, 386–389.
6. Campbell DLM, Goodwin SL, Makagon MM, et al (2016): Failed landings after laying hen flight in a commercial aviary over two flock cycles. Poult Sci, 95:188–97.
7. Chen BL, Haith KL, Mullens BA (2011): Beak condition drives abundance and grooming-mediated competitive asymmetry in a poultry ectoparasite community. Parasitology, 138, 748-757.
8. Daigle CL (2017): Chapter 11 - Controlling Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Egg Laying Flocks. In: Patricia Hester (ed.) Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements. London, UK: Academic Press.
9. David B, Oppermann Moe R, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust. Animals, 5, 495-511.
10. David B, Mejdell C, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part II—Ammonia. Animals, 5, 886-896.
11. DEFRA (2002): Code of recommendations for the welfare of livestock: meat chickens and breeding chickens, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. DEFRA Publications, London.
12. de Goede D, Gremmen B, Rodenburg BT, et al (2013): Reducing damaging behaviour in robust livestock farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 46-53.
13. de Jong I, Berg C, Butterworth A, et al. (2012): Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders. EFSA, Supporting Publications 2012: EN-295.
14. Dinev I, Denev S, Vashin I, et al (2019): Pathomorphological investigations on the prevalence of contact dermatitis lesions in broiler chickens, J Appl Anim Res, 47, 129-134.
15. Drake KA, Donnelly CA, Stamp Dawkins M (2010): Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 51, 725-733.
16. Đukić Stojčić M, Perić L, Relić R, et al (2017): Keel bone damage in laying hens reared in different production systems in Serbia. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 33(4), 487-492.
17. Duncan IJH (1998): Behavior and Behavioral Needs. Poult Sci, 77, 1766–1772.
18. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1971): Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 19, 500–504.
19. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972): Thwarting of feeding behavior in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 444–451.
20. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972a): An analysis of displacement preening in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 68–71.
21. European Commission (EC) (1999): Council directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999. Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities L, 203, 53-57.
22. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2005): The welfare aspects of various systems of keeping laying hens. The EFSA Journal, 197, 1-23.
23. El-Deek A, El-Sabrout K (2019): Behaviour and meat quality of chicken under different housing systems. World Poultry Sci J, 75, 105-114.
24. Ekesbo I (2011): Domestic Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). In: Farm Animal Behaviour: Characteristics for Assessment of Health and Welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK.
25. Estevez I (2007): Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poult Sci, 86, 1265–1272.
26. Freire R, Eastwood MA, Joyce M (2011): Minor beak trimming in chickens leads to loss of mechanoreception and magnetoreception. J Anim Sci, 89, 1201–1206.
27. Gilani AM, Knowles TG, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 148, 54– 63.
28. Gonçalves S, Ferreira R, Pereira I, et al (2017): Behavioral and physiological responses of different genetic lines of free-range broiler raised on a semi-intensive system. J Anim Behav Biometeorol, 5, 112-117.
29. Harlander-Matauschek A, Rodenburg TB, Sandilands V, et al (2015): Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens. Worlds Poult Sci J, 71, 461-472.
30. Herkens JLT, Delezie E, Rodenburg TB, et al (2016): Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. Poult Sci, 95, 482-488.
31. LeBlanc S, Tobalske B, Quinton M, et al (2016): Physical Health Problems and Environmental Challenges Influence Balancing Behaviour in Laying Hens. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0153477.
32. Nasr MAF, Murrell J, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 54, 165-170.
33. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Çetin S (2008): Effects of breeder age and stocking density on performance, carcass characteristics and some stres parameters of broilers, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 21, 262 – 269.
34. Onbaşılar EE, Erol H, Cantekin Z, et al (2007): Influence of intermittent lighting on broiler performance, incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia, tonic immobility, some blood parameters and antibody production, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 20, 550 – 555.
35. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Erdem E, et al (2008): Influence of lighting periods and stocking densities on performance, carcass characteristics and some stress parameters in broilers. Arch Geflügelk, 72, 193-200.
36. Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, et al (2015): Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages, Poult Sci, 94, 559-564.
37. Onbaşılar EE, Erdem E, Ünal N, et al (2016): Comparison of liver and bone health of two laying hen strains kept in different cage systems. Europ Poult Sci, 80, 1-9.
38. Riber AB, Casey-Trott TM, Herskin MS (2018): The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens. Front Vet Sci, 5, 6.
39. Rodenburg TB., Tuyttens FAM, De Reu K, et al (2008): Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: An on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare, 17, 363–373.
40. Rodenburg TB, Van Krimpen MM, De Jong IC, et al (2013): The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World Poultry Sci J, 69, 361-374.
41. Sandilands V, Moinard C, Sparks NHC (2009): Providing laying hens with perches: Fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? Br Poult Sci, 4, 395–406.
42. SCAHAW (2000): The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium.
43. Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD (2010): Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult Sci, 89, 2043–2051.
44. Shields S, Greger M (2013): Animal Welfare and Food Safety Aspects of Confining Broiler Chickens to Cages. Animals (Basel), 3, 386–400.
45. Şimşek ÜG, Baykalir Y, Erişir M, et al (2018): Effects of conventional and organic rearing systems and hen age on oxidative stress parameters of blood and ovarian tissues in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 65, 85-91
46. Sosnówka - Czajka E, Herbut E, Skomorucha I (2010): Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann Anim Sci, 10, 349–360.
47. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Elson HA, et al (2011): Pasture-based system for poultry production: implications and perspectives. World Poultry Sci J, 67, 47-58.
48. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, et al (2015): Effects of pasture management on poultry welfare and meat quality in organic poultry production systems. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 375-384.
49. Stojcic MD, Bessei W (2009): The effect of locomotor activity and weight load on bone problems in fast and slow growing chickens. Arch Geflügelk, 73, 242-249.
50. Vaarst M, Steenfeldt S, Horsted K (2015): Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 609-620.

Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems

Year 2019, Volume: 66 Issue: 4, 423 - 428, 09.09.2019

Renata Relić , Evangelia Sossidou Anna Dedousi Lidija Perić İvana Božičković Mirjana đukić-stojčić

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496

Cited By: 13

Abstract

This review paper aims to give an overview of the literature data on
common behavioral and health problems in broiler chickens and laying hens and
to explain their interrelation and relation to the rearing system. In the
initial part, the mechanism of arising of the most common forms of abnormal
behavior and the way they affect the poultry are briefly described.
Furthermore, the possibility of poultry to fulfill behavioral needs in
different rearing systems and some of the consequences to the birds in the case
of their inability to meet their needs are displayed. The influence of the main
microclimate and space factors is also discussed, as well as the occurrence of
some infectious, parasitic and production diseases in poultry rearing systems.
The welfare problems of poultry are complexes and most often caused by the system
design and its improper use. Continuous work on improving rearing systems is as
important as better informing the producers and the public on poultry welfare
problems.

Keywords

Behavior, health, broilers, hens, rearing

References

1. Appleby MC, Mendi JA, Barry OH (2004): Behaviour, Causes and effects. In: Poultry behaviour and welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK. 2. Avcılar ÖV, Kocakaya A, Onbaşılar EE, et al (2018): Influence of sepiolite additions to different litter materials on performance and some welfare parameters of broilers and litter characteristics. Poultry Sci, 97, 3085-3091.
3. Blokhuis H J (1986): Feather pecking in poultry: Its relation with ground pecking. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 16, 63–67.
4. Breed MD, Moore J (2012): Homeostasis and Time Budgets, 99-123. In: Animal Behavior, Elsevier.
5. Bullis KL, Snoeyenbos GH, Roekel HV (1950): A keratoconjunctivitis in chickens. Poult Sci, 329, 386–389.
6. Campbell DLM, Goodwin SL, Makagon MM, et al (2016): Failed landings after laying hen flight in a commercial aviary over two flock cycles. Poult Sci, 95:188–97.
7. Chen BL, Haith KL, Mullens BA (2011): Beak condition drives abundance and grooming-mediated competitive asymmetry in a poultry ectoparasite community. Parasitology, 138, 748-757.
8. Daigle CL (2017): Chapter 11 - Controlling Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Egg Laying Flocks. In: Patricia Hester (ed.) Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements. London, UK: Academic Press.
9. David B, Oppermann Moe R, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust. Animals, 5, 495-511.
10. David B, Mejdell C, Michel V, et al (2015): Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part II—Ammonia. Animals, 5, 886-896.
11. DEFRA (2002): Code of recommendations for the welfare of livestock: meat chickens and breeding chickens, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. DEFRA Publications, London.
12. de Goede D, Gremmen B, Rodenburg BT, et al (2013): Reducing damaging behaviour in robust livestock farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 46-53.
13. de Jong I, Berg C, Butterworth A, et al. (2012): Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders. EFSA, Supporting Publications 2012: EN-295.
14. Dinev I, Denev S, Vashin I, et al (2019): Pathomorphological investigations on the prevalence of contact dermatitis lesions in broiler chickens, J Appl Anim Res, 47, 129-134.
15. Drake KA, Donnelly CA, Stamp Dawkins M (2010): Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 51, 725-733.
16. Đukić Stojčić M, Perić L, Relić R, et al (2017): Keel bone damage in laying hens reared in different production systems in Serbia. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 33(4), 487-492.
17. Duncan IJH (1998): Behavior and Behavioral Needs. Poult Sci, 77, 1766–1772.
18. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1971): Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 19, 500–504.
19. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972): Thwarting of feeding behavior in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 444–451.
20. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972a): An analysis of displacement preening in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav, 20, 68–71.
21. European Commission (EC) (1999): Council directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999. Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities L, 203, 53-57.
22. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2005): The welfare aspects of various systems of keeping laying hens. The EFSA Journal, 197, 1-23.
23. El-Deek A, El-Sabrout K (2019): Behaviour and meat quality of chicken under different housing systems. World Poultry Sci J, 75, 105-114.
24. Ekesbo I (2011): Domestic Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). In: Farm Animal Behaviour: Characteristics for Assessment of Health and Welfare. CABI Publishing. The UK.
25. Estevez I (2007): Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poult Sci, 86, 1265–1272.
26. Freire R, Eastwood MA, Joyce M (2011): Minor beak trimming in chickens leads to loss of mechanoreception and magnetoreception. J Anim Sci, 89, 1201–1206.
27. Gilani AM, Knowles TG, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 148, 54– 63.
28. Gonçalves S, Ferreira R, Pereira I, et al (2017): Behavioral and physiological responses of different genetic lines of free-range broiler raised on a semi-intensive system. J Anim Behav Biometeorol, 5, 112-117.
29. Harlander-Matauschek A, Rodenburg TB, Sandilands V, et al (2015): Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens. Worlds Poult Sci J, 71, 461-472.
30. Herkens JLT, Delezie E, Rodenburg TB, et al (2016): Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. Poult Sci, 95, 482-488.
31. LeBlanc S, Tobalske B, Quinton M, et al (2016): Physical Health Problems and Environmental Challenges Influence Balancing Behaviour in Laying Hens. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0153477.
32. Nasr MAF, Murrell J, Nicol CJ (2013): The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 54, 165-170.
33. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Çetin S (2008): Effects of breeder age and stocking density on performance, carcass characteristics and some stres parameters of broilers, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 21, 262 – 269.
34. Onbaşılar EE, Erol H, Cantekin Z, et al (2007): Influence of intermittent lighting on broiler performance, incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia, tonic immobility, some blood parameters and antibody production, Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 20, 550 – 555.
35. Onbaşılar EE, Poyraz Ö, Erdem E, et al (2008): Influence of lighting periods and stocking densities on performance, carcass characteristics and some stress parameters in broilers. Arch Geflügelk, 72, 193-200.
36. Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, et al (2015): Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages, Poult Sci, 94, 559-564.
37. Onbaşılar EE, Erdem E, Ünal N, et al (2016): Comparison of liver and bone health of two laying hen strains kept in different cage systems. Europ Poult Sci, 80, 1-9.
38. Riber AB, Casey-Trott TM, Herskin MS (2018): The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens. Front Vet Sci, 5, 6.
39. Rodenburg TB., Tuyttens FAM, De Reu K, et al (2008): Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: An on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare, 17, 363–373.
40. Rodenburg TB, Van Krimpen MM, De Jong IC, et al (2013): The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World Poultry Sci J, 69, 361-374.
41. Sandilands V, Moinard C, Sparks NHC (2009): Providing laying hens with perches: Fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? Br Poult Sci, 4, 395–406.
42. SCAHAW (2000): The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium.
43. Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD (2010): Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult Sci, 89, 2043–2051.
44. Shields S, Greger M (2013): Animal Welfare and Food Safety Aspects of Confining Broiler Chickens to Cages. Animals (Basel), 3, 386–400.
45. Şimşek ÜG, Baykalir Y, Erişir M, et al (2018): Effects of conventional and organic rearing systems and hen age on oxidative stress parameters of blood and ovarian tissues in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 65, 85-91
46. Sosnówka - Czajka E, Herbut E, Skomorucha I (2010): Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann Anim Sci, 10, 349–360.
47. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Elson HA, et al (2011): Pasture-based system for poultry production: implications and perspectives. World Poultry Sci J, 67, 47-58.
48. Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, et al (2015): Effects of pasture management on poultry welfare and meat quality in organic poultry production systems. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 375-384.
49. Stojcic MD, Bessei W (2009): The effect of locomotor activity and weight load on bone problems in fast and slow growing chickens. Arch Geflügelk, 73, 242-249.
50. Vaarst M, Steenfeldt S, Horsted K (2015): Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. World Poultry Sci J, 71, 609-620.

There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Subjects	Veterinary Surgery
Journal Section	Review
Authors	Renata Relić 0000-0001-5320-7863 Evangelia Sossidou 0000-0002-5716-0908 Anna Dedousi 0000-0002-5399-9773 Lidija Perić 0000-0002-2151-4516 İvana Božičković 0000-0001-6151-4273 Mirjana đukić-stojčić 0000-0002-0784-3671
Publication Date	September 9, 2019
Published in Issue	Year 2019Volume: 66 Issue: 4

Cite

APA	Relić, R., Sossidou, E., Dedousi, A., Perić, L., et al. (2019). Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 66(4), 423-428. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496
AMA	Relić R, Sossidou E, Dedousi A, Perić L, Božičković İ, đukić-stojčić M. Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. September 2019;66(4):423-428. doi:10.33988/auvfd.597496
Chicago	Relić, Renata, Evangelia Sossidou, Anna Dedousi, Lidija Perić, İvana Božičković, and Mirjana đukić-stojčić. “Behavioral and Health Problems of Poultry Related to Rearing Systems”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66, no. 4 (September 2019): 423-28. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496.
EndNote	Relić R, Sossidou E, Dedousi A, Perić L, Božičković İ, đukić-stojčić M (September 1, 2019) Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66 4 423–428.
IEEE	R. Relić, E. Sossidou, A. Dedousi, L. Perić, İ. Božičković, and M. đukić-stojčić, “Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 423–428, 2019, doi: 10.33988/auvfd.597496.
ISNAD	Relić, Renata et al. “Behavioral and Health Problems of Poultry Related to Rearing Systems”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66/4 (September 2019), 423-428. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.597496.
JAMA	Relić R, Sossidou E, Dedousi A, Perić L, Božičković İ, đukić-stojčić M. Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019;66:423–428.
MLA	Relić, Renata et al. “Behavioral and Health Problems of Poultry Related to Rearing Systems”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 66, no. 4, 2019, pp. 423-8, doi:10.33988/auvfd.597496.
Vancouver	Relić R, Sossidou E, Dedousi A, Perić L, Božičković İ, đukić-stojčić M. Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019;66(4):423-8.

Cited By

Influence of different litter types on ammonia and carbon dioxide emission in broiler production

European Poultry Science

https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2021.333

Guanidinoacetic acid supplementation and stocking density effects on broiler performance: behavior, biochemistry, immunity, and small intestinal histomorphology

Abstract

References

Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Cite

Cited By

European Poultry Science

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

BIO Web of Conferences

IEEE Access

Agriculture

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Contemporary Agriculture

World's Poultry Science Journal

Italian Journal of Animal Science

The Journal of Poultry Science

Animals

Animals

Animals