Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2021,
Cilt: 68 Sayı: 1, 7 - 14, 25.12.2020
Öz
Kaynakça
- 1. Anonymous (2017): Effect of humic acid on animals and humans an overview of literature and a review of current research. Available at http://www.humichealth.info/effects.html (Accessed March 10, 2017).
- 2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists-AOAC (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.
- 3. Budağ C, Kara U (2016): The effect of use of humic acid in some blood parameters and rumen protozoa in Norduz lambs. Iğdır Univ J Inst Sci & Tech, 6, 185-190.
- 4. Chirase NK, Greene LW, McCollum FT, et al (2000): Effect of bovipro on performance and serum metabolites concentrations of beef steers. Proc West Sec Amer Soc Anim Sci, 51, 415-418.
- 5. Covington BR, Ramsey WS, Greene LW, et al (1997): Effects of humate on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics in feedlot lambs. J Anim Sci, 75: 270.
- 6. Cusack PMV (2008): Effect of a dietary complex of humic and fulvic acids (FeedMAX15TM) on the health and production of feedlot cattle destined for the Australian domestic market. Aust Vet J, 86, 46-49.
- 7. Degirmencioglu T (2012): Possibilities of using humic acid in diets for Saanen goats. Mlijekartsvo, 62, 278-283.
- 8. Degirmencioglu T, Ozbilgin S (2013): Effect of administration of humic acid on somatic cell count and total bacteria in Saanen goats. Inter J Vet Sci, 2, 151-154.
- 9. Galip N, Polat U, Biricik H (2010): Effects of supplemental humic acid on ruminal fermentation and blood variables in rams. Ital J Anim Sci, 9, 390-393.
- 10. Griban VG, Stepchenko LM, Zhorina LV (1988): The live weight gain and disease resistence of young cattle and poultry stock as influenced by physiologicalyactive peat preperation. 45-50. In: Proceedings of VIII Inter Peat Congress. Leningrad, Russia.
- 11. Golbs S, Fuchs V, Kühnert M, et al (1982): Prenatal toxicologial testing of humic acids on laboratory rat. Arch Exp Veterinarmed, 36, 179-185.
- 12. Grummer RR (1995): Impact of changes in organic nutrient metabolism on feeding the transition dairy cow. J Anim Sci, 73, 2820-2813.
- 13. Karademir G, Karademir B (2003): Yem katkı maddesi olarak kullanılan biyoteknolojik ürünler. Lalahan Hay Araşt Enst Derg, 43, 61-74.
- 14. Kutlu HR, Serbester U (2014): Ruminant beslemede son gelişmeler. TURJAF, 2, 18-37.
- 15. McMurphy CP, Duff GC, Harris MA, et al (2009): Effects of humic/fulvic acid in beef cattle finishing diets on animal performance, ruminal ammonia and serum urea nitrogen concentration. J Appl Anim Res, 35, 97-100.
- 16. McMurphy CP, Duff GC, Sanders SR, et al (2011): Effects of supplementing humates on rumen fermentation in Holstein steers. S Afr J Anim Sci, 41, 134-140.
- 17. National Research Council-NRC (2001): Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Natl Acad Press, Washington DC.
- 18. Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ (1981): The Detergent System of Analysis. 123-158. In: WPT James, O Theander (Eds), The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food. Marcel Dekker, New York.
- 19. Teravita TM (2018): Humates in poultry and stock farming. Available at http://www.teravita.com/humates/chapter9.htm. (Accessed December 24, 2018).
- 20. Tomassen BPH, Faust RH (2018): The use of a processed humic acid product as a feed supplement in dairy production in the Netherlends, 339, In: Proceedings of The World Grows Organic International Scientific Conference, August, Basle, Switzerland.
- 21. Tunç MA (2012): Süt emme dönemindeki buzağılarda humat ve probiyotiklerin performans, rumen fermentasyonu ve kan parametreleri üzerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
- 22. Tunç MA, Yörük MA (2012): Humik asitlerin koyunlarda rumen ve kan parametreleri ile protozoon sayısı üzerine etkisi. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 18, 55-60.
- 23. Xiaowang X, Shaohaua S, Lixia H (2010): Study on the effect of biochemical fulvic acid on somatic cell count and milk performance of dairy cows. J Chin Dairy Cattle, 5, 1-7.
Yıl 2021,
Cilt: 68 Sayı: 1, 7 - 14, 25.12.2020
Öz
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different levels of humate addition to colostrum quality, milk composition, somatic cell count, some blood metabolites and reproductive performance in the period from prepartum 40th to postpartum 60th day. In this study, dairy cows from prepartum 40th to postpartum 60th day were given humate additive which was according to dosed on dry matter consumption basis from (75 g, 150 g). In the study, 26 Swiss Brown cows in the same care and feeding conditions were used in the second lactation. The feeds were weighed to determine the dry matter intake of the individual cows daily. Blood was collected from the vena jugularis at 40, 30, 20 and 10 days before the estimated date of birth, at calving (day 0) and on days 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 after birth. Colostrum and milk samples were taken in the study. As a result of the study, it has been determined that the use of humate additives has no effect on body condition score, body weight, in milk non-fat milk solid, density, protein, lactose, freezing point, somatic cell count, in blood triglicerides, phosphorus, magnesium, albumin, glucose, blood urea nitrogen. It was found that with the addition of humate additive to the feed, colostrum specific gravity increased, prepartum and postpartum dry matter intake increased, milk yield and the fat percentage increased, serum non-esterified fatty acid and blood beta-hydroxybutyric acid levels decreased, and postpartum serum calcium level increased. It was concluded that 75 g of humate, which is determined based on dry matter consumption, can be added to the rations of the dairy cows at this dose and has positive effects on colostrum quality, milk yield, milk fat ratio, and negative energy balance.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Anonymous (2017): Effect of humic acid on animals and humans an overview of literature and a review of current research. Available at http://www.humichealth.info/effects.html (Accessed March 10, 2017).
- 2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists-AOAC (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.
- 3. Budağ C, Kara U (2016): The effect of use of humic acid in some blood parameters and rumen protozoa in Norduz lambs. Iğdır Univ J Inst Sci & Tech, 6, 185-190.
- 4. Chirase NK, Greene LW, McCollum FT, et al (2000): Effect of bovipro on performance and serum metabolites concentrations of beef steers. Proc West Sec Amer Soc Anim Sci, 51, 415-418.
- 5. Covington BR, Ramsey WS, Greene LW, et al (1997): Effects of humate on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics in feedlot lambs. J Anim Sci, 75: 270.
- 6. Cusack PMV (2008): Effect of a dietary complex of humic and fulvic acids (FeedMAX15TM) on the health and production of feedlot cattle destined for the Australian domestic market. Aust Vet J, 86, 46-49.
- 7. Degirmencioglu T (2012): Possibilities of using humic acid in diets for Saanen goats. Mlijekartsvo, 62, 278-283.
- 8. Degirmencioglu T, Ozbilgin S (2013): Effect of administration of humic acid on somatic cell count and total bacteria in Saanen goats. Inter J Vet Sci, 2, 151-154.
- 9. Galip N, Polat U, Biricik H (2010): Effects of supplemental humic acid on ruminal fermentation and blood variables in rams. Ital J Anim Sci, 9, 390-393.
- 10. Griban VG, Stepchenko LM, Zhorina LV (1988): The live weight gain and disease resistence of young cattle and poultry stock as influenced by physiologicalyactive peat preperation. 45-50. In: Proceedings of VIII Inter Peat Congress. Leningrad, Russia.
- 11. Golbs S, Fuchs V, Kühnert M, et al (1982): Prenatal toxicologial testing of humic acids on laboratory rat. Arch Exp Veterinarmed, 36, 179-185.
- 12. Grummer RR (1995): Impact of changes in organic nutrient metabolism on feeding the transition dairy cow. J Anim Sci, 73, 2820-2813.
- 13. Karademir G, Karademir B (2003): Yem katkı maddesi olarak kullanılan biyoteknolojik ürünler. Lalahan Hay Araşt Enst Derg, 43, 61-74.
- 14. Kutlu HR, Serbester U (2014): Ruminant beslemede son gelişmeler. TURJAF, 2, 18-37.
- 15. McMurphy CP, Duff GC, Harris MA, et al (2009): Effects of humic/fulvic acid in beef cattle finishing diets on animal performance, ruminal ammonia and serum urea nitrogen concentration. J Appl Anim Res, 35, 97-100.
- 16. McMurphy CP, Duff GC, Sanders SR, et al (2011): Effects of supplementing humates on rumen fermentation in Holstein steers. S Afr J Anim Sci, 41, 134-140.
- 17. National Research Council-NRC (2001): Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Natl Acad Press, Washington DC.
- 18. Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ (1981): The Detergent System of Analysis. 123-158. In: WPT James, O Theander (Eds), The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food. Marcel Dekker, New York.
- 19. Teravita TM (2018): Humates in poultry and stock farming. Available at http://www.teravita.com/humates/chapter9.htm. (Accessed December 24, 2018).
- 20. Tomassen BPH, Faust RH (2018): The use of a processed humic acid product as a feed supplement in dairy production in the Netherlends, 339, In: Proceedings of The World Grows Organic International Scientific Conference, August, Basle, Switzerland.
- 21. Tunç MA (2012): Süt emme dönemindeki buzağılarda humat ve probiyotiklerin performans, rumen fermentasyonu ve kan parametreleri üzerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
- 22. Tunç MA, Yörük MA (2012): Humik asitlerin koyunlarda rumen ve kan parametreleri ile protozoon sayısı üzerine etkisi. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 18, 55-60.
- 23. Xiaowang X, Shaohaua S, Lixia H (2010): Study on the effect of biochemical fulvic acid on somatic cell count and milk performance of dairy cows. J Chin Dairy Cattle, 5, 1-7.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Veteriner Cerrahi |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 25 Aralık 2020 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2021Cilt: 68 Sayı: 1 |
