Öz
The aim of the study was to analyze mandible of the Honamli and Hair goats according to the sex factor by geometric morphometric methods. A total of 36 adult goat mandibles including 9 males and 9 females for each breed, were used in the study. After the mandibles were photographed from the left lateral side, 10 homolog landmarks were marked. Generalized Procrustes, Relative Warp, and Principal Component Analysis were performed for the data of landmark coordinates. In the study, the first principal component explained 28.752% and 37.325% of the total shape difference in the Honamli and Hair goat, respectively. In the analysis made among goat breeds according to the sex factor, the first principal component explained 40.809% of the total shape difference in females and 30.486% of the total shape difference in males. Consequently, the Hair goat showed a significant sex difference compared to the Honamli goat. Besides, it was remarkable that male goats clustered clearly compared to female goats in terms of the breed factor.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Geometric Morphometry Honamli Goat Mandible Principal Component Analysis
Kaynakça
- Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2013): A field comes of age: Geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix, 24, 7-14.
- Ansell WFH (1972): Order Artiodactyla. In The mammals of Africa. An identification manual Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
- Batubara A, Noor RR, Farajallah A, et al (2011): Morphometric and phylogenic analysis of six population Indonesian local goat. J Ani Sci Tech, 34, 165-74.
- Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J (2010): Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. Homo, 61, 16-32.
- Clark KM (1995): The later prehistoric and protohistoric dog: the emergence of canine diversity. Archaeozoologia, 7, 9-32.
- Elmaz Ö, Saatçi M, Mamak N, et al (2012): The determination of some morphological characteristics of Honamli goat and kids, defined as a new indigenous goat breed of Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 18, 481-5.
- Ensminger ME, Parker RO (1986): Sheep and goat Science, Fifth Edition. Danville, Illinois: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc.
- Figueirido B, Serrano-Alarcón SJ, Palmqvist P (2012): Geometric morphometrics shows differences and similarities in skull shape between the red and giant pandas. J Zool, 286, 293-302.
- Food and Agriculture Organization; FAO (2007): Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic resources and Interlaken Declaration on Animal Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.
- Frost SR, Marcus LF, Bookstein FL, et al (2003): Cranial allometry, phylogeography, and systematics of largebodied papionins (primates: Cercopithecinae) inferred from geometric morphometric analysis of landmark data. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol, 275, 1048-1072.
- Guintard C, Lallemand M (2003): Osteometric study of metapodial bones in sheep (Ovis aries, L. 1758). Ann Anat, 185, 573-583.
- Gündemir O, Özkan E, Dayan MO, et al (2020): Sexual analysis in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) neurocranium using geometric morphometric methods. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 44, 681-687.
- Gürbüz İ, Aytek Aİ, Demiraslan Y, et al (2020): Geometric morphometric analysis of cranium of wolf (Canis lupus) and German shepherd dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 26, 525-532.
- Hammer Q, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001): PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron, 4, 9.
- Kimmerle EH, Ross A, Slice D (2008): Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci, 53, 54-57.
- Klingenberg CP (2011): MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric Morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour, 11, 353-357.
- Marcus LF, Hingst-Zaher E, Zaher H (2000): Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix, 11, 27-47.
- Mitteroecker P, Gunz P (2009): Advances in Geometric Morphometrics. Evol Biol, 36, 235-247.
- Naderi S, Rezaei HR, Pompanon F, et al (2008): The goat domestication process inferred from large-scale mitochondrial DNA analysis of wild and domestic individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 105, 17659-17664.
- O’Higgins P (2000): The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. J Anat, 197, 103-120.
- Onar V, Belli O (2005): Estimation of shoulder height from long bone measurements on dogs unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe early Iron Age necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. Rev Med Vet, 156, 53-60.
- Önel A (2010): Comparison of hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) from Elazığ and Malatya by using geometric morphometrics techniques. Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
- Özden B (2008): İran küçük bal arısı (Apis florea Fabricius) populasyonlarında geometrik morfometrik analizi. Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Karaelmas Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Zonguldak.
- Payne WJA, Wilson RT (1999): An introduction to Animal Husbandry in the tropics. Blackwell Publishing Company: Oxford, UK.
- Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (1990): Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop; Proceedings Michigan Morphometrics Work. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1990): Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool, 39, 40-59.
- Rohlf FJ (2017): TpsSmall Version 1.34, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Rohlf FJ (2018): TpsDig Version 2.31, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Rohlf FJ (2019): TpsRelw Version 1.70, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Rohlf FJ (2019): TpsUtil program Version 1.79, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Slice DE (2005): Modern Morphometrics. In: Physical Anthropology, Kluwer Acad./Plenum, New York.
- Slice DE (2007): Geometric morphometrics. Annu Rev Anthropol, 36, 261-281.
- Tekin ME, Öğeç M (2017): Konya Bölgesinde Halk Elinde Yetiştirilen Kıl Keçisi Oğlaklarının Büyüme ve Yaşama Gücü. Lalahan Hay Araşt Enst Derg, 57, 93-98.
- The Official Gazette of Turkish Republic (2015): Communication on Supporting Princip¬les of Animal Husbandry Practices, No: 2015/43, Num: 29535.
- Viscosi V, Cardini A (2011): Leaf Morphology, Taxonomy and Geometric Morphometrics: A Simplified Protocol for Beginners. PLoS One, 6, e25630.
- Yalcin H, Kaya MA, Arslan A (2010): Comparative Geometrical Morphometries on the Mandibles of Anatolian Wild Sheep (Ovis gmelini anatolica) and Akkaraman Sheep (Ovis aries). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 55-61.
- Zeder MA, Hesse B (2000): The Initial Domestication of goat (Capra hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10,000 Years Ago. Science Journal, 287, 2254-2257.
- Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, et al (2004): Geometric Morphometrics For Biologists: A Primer, Academic Press, Cambridge.
- Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD (2012): Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer, Academic Press, Amsterdam.
Öz
Çalışmada geometrik morfometrik metotlarla Honamlı ve Kıl Keçisi mandibula’sının cinsiyet faktörü ile birlikte analiz edilmesi amaçlandı. Çalışmada her ırk için 9’ar adet erkek ve dişi olmak üzere toplamda 36 adet ergin keçi mandibula’sı kullanıldı. Mandibula’lar sol lateral yönden fotoğraflandıktan sonra 10 adet homolog landmark işaretlendi. Landmark koordinat verileri General Procrustes, Relative Warp ve Temel Bileşenler analizine tabi tutuldu. Çalışmada Honamlı ve Kıl Keçisinde cinsiyetler arası yapılan karşılaştırmada birinci temel bileşen toplam şekil farklılığının sırasıyla %28,752 ve %37,325’ini açıkladı. Cinsiyet faktörüne göre keçi ırkları arasında yapılan analizde ise birinci temel bileşen dişilerde toplam şekil farklılığının %40,809’unu, erkeklerde %30,486’sını açıkladı. Sonuç olarak Kıl Keçilerinin Honamlı Keçilerine göre oldukça belirgin bir cinsiyet farklılığı göstermesi, ırk faktörü bakımından erkek keçilerin, dişi keçilere kıyasla net bir şekilde kümeleşmesi dikkat çekiciydi.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Geometrik morfometri Honamlı keçisi Mandibula Temel Bileşenler Analizi
Kaynakça
- Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2013): A field comes of age: Geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix, 24, 7-14.
- Ansell WFH (1972): Order Artiodactyla. In The mammals of Africa. An identification manual Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
- Batubara A, Noor RR, Farajallah A, et al (2011): Morphometric and phylogenic analysis of six population Indonesian local goat. J Ani Sci Tech, 34, 165-74.
- Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J (2010): Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. Homo, 61, 16-32.
- Clark KM (1995): The later prehistoric and protohistoric dog: the emergence of canine diversity. Archaeozoologia, 7, 9-32.
- Elmaz Ö, Saatçi M, Mamak N, et al (2012): The determination of some morphological characteristics of Honamli goat and kids, defined as a new indigenous goat breed of Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 18, 481-5.
- Ensminger ME, Parker RO (1986): Sheep and goat Science, Fifth Edition. Danville, Illinois: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc.
- Figueirido B, Serrano-Alarcón SJ, Palmqvist P (2012): Geometric morphometrics shows differences and similarities in skull shape between the red and giant pandas. J Zool, 286, 293-302.
- Food and Agriculture Organization; FAO (2007): Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic resources and Interlaken Declaration on Animal Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.
- Frost SR, Marcus LF, Bookstein FL, et al (2003): Cranial allometry, phylogeography, and systematics of largebodied papionins (primates: Cercopithecinae) inferred from geometric morphometric analysis of landmark data. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol, 275, 1048-1072.
- Guintard C, Lallemand M (2003): Osteometric study of metapodial bones in sheep (Ovis aries, L. 1758). Ann Anat, 185, 573-583.
- Gündemir O, Özkan E, Dayan MO, et al (2020): Sexual analysis in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) neurocranium using geometric morphometric methods. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 44, 681-687.
- Gürbüz İ, Aytek Aİ, Demiraslan Y, et al (2020): Geometric morphometric analysis of cranium of wolf (Canis lupus) and German shepherd dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 26, 525-532.
- Hammer Q, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001): PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron, 4, 9.
- Kimmerle EH, Ross A, Slice D (2008): Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci, 53, 54-57.
- Klingenberg CP (2011): MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric Morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour, 11, 353-357.
- Marcus LF, Hingst-Zaher E, Zaher H (2000): Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix, 11, 27-47.
- Mitteroecker P, Gunz P (2009): Advances in Geometric Morphometrics. Evol Biol, 36, 235-247.
- Naderi S, Rezaei HR, Pompanon F, et al (2008): The goat domestication process inferred from large-scale mitochondrial DNA analysis of wild and domestic individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 105, 17659-17664.
- O’Higgins P (2000): The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. J Anat, 197, 103-120.
- Onar V, Belli O (2005): Estimation of shoulder height from long bone measurements on dogs unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe early Iron Age necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. Rev Med Vet, 156, 53-60.
- Önel A (2010): Comparison of hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) from Elazığ and Malatya by using geometric morphometrics techniques. Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
- Özden B (2008): İran küçük bal arısı (Apis florea Fabricius) populasyonlarında geometrik morfometrik analizi. Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Karaelmas Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Zonguldak.
- Payne WJA, Wilson RT (1999): An introduction to Animal Husbandry in the tropics. Blackwell Publishing Company: Oxford, UK.
- Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (1990): Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop; Proceedings Michigan Morphometrics Work. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1990): Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool, 39, 40-59.
- Rohlf FJ (2017): TpsSmall Version 1.34, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Rohlf FJ (2018): TpsDig Version 2.31, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Rohlf FJ (2019): TpsRelw Version 1.70, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Rohlf FJ (2019): TpsUtil program Version 1.79, Ecology & Evolution. SUNY at Stone Brook, USA.
- Slice DE (2005): Modern Morphometrics. In: Physical Anthropology, Kluwer Acad./Plenum, New York.
- Slice DE (2007): Geometric morphometrics. Annu Rev Anthropol, 36, 261-281.
- Tekin ME, Öğeç M (2017): Konya Bölgesinde Halk Elinde Yetiştirilen Kıl Keçisi Oğlaklarının Büyüme ve Yaşama Gücü. Lalahan Hay Araşt Enst Derg, 57, 93-98.
- The Official Gazette of Turkish Republic (2015): Communication on Supporting Princip¬les of Animal Husbandry Practices, No: 2015/43, Num: 29535.
- Viscosi V, Cardini A (2011): Leaf Morphology, Taxonomy and Geometric Morphometrics: A Simplified Protocol for Beginners. PLoS One, 6, e25630.
- Yalcin H, Kaya MA, Arslan A (2010): Comparative Geometrical Morphometries on the Mandibles of Anatolian Wild Sheep (Ovis gmelini anatolica) and Akkaraman Sheep (Ovis aries). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 55-61.
- Zeder MA, Hesse B (2000): The Initial Domestication of goat (Capra hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10,000 Years Ago. Science Journal, 287, 2254-2257.
- Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, et al (2004): Geometric Morphometrics For Biologists: A Primer, Academic Press, Cambridge.
- Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD (2012): Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer, Academic Press, Amsterdam.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Veteriner Cerrahi |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 27 Eylül 2021 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2021Cilt: 68 Sayı: 4 |
