Araştırma Makalesi
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2021, Cilt 68, Sayı 4, 329 - 336, 27.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.779272

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy T, Yılmaz M, Tuna T (2001): The effect of oviposition time on egg quality and the possibility of estimating egg shell weight using a formula in commercial layers. Turk J Vet Anım Sci, 25, 811-816.
  • Akyurek H, Okur AA (2009): Effect of storage time, temperature and hen age on egg quality in free-range layer hens. J Anım Vet Adv, 8, 1953-1958.
  • Angelovičová M, Ševčíková V, Angelovič M, et al (2014): Comparison of two different breeding systems laying hens in relation to egg shell quality. J Anim Sci Biotechno, 47, 166-171.
  • AOAC (2000): Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
  • Ayorinde KL, Olagbuyiro B (1991): The influence of clutch size and oviposition time on egg weight and egg index in Hubbard layers. Bull Anim Health Prod Afr, 39, 251-253.
  • Batkowska J, Brodacki A, Knaga S (2014): Quality of laying hen eggs during storage depending on egg weight and type of cage system (conventional vs. furnished cages). Ann Anim Sci, 14, 707-719.
  • Campo J, Cigarroa F, Torres O (2015): Effect of oviposition time on egg quality characteristics. World's Poult Sci J, 71, 106.
  • Caner C, Yüceer M (2015): Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poult Sci, 94, 1665-1677.
  • Carpenter K, Clegg K (1956): The metabolizable energy of poultry feeding stuffs in relation to their chemical composition. J Sci Food Agri, 7, 45-51.
  • Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001): Basic and Clinical Biostatistics, 3rd ed. Lange Medical Books. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York.
  • Dikmen BY, Ipek A, Şahan Ü et al (2017): Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turk J Vet Anım Sci, 41, 77-84.
  • Hanusova E, Hrnčár C, Hanus A, et al (2015): Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotechn Zootechn, 18, 20-24.
  • Heldman DR (2011): Food preservation process design. Procedia Food Sci, 1, 685-689.
  • Hill AT, Hall JW (1980): Effects of various combinations of oil spraying, washing, sanitizing, storage time, strain, and age of layer upon albumen quality changes in storage and minimum sample sizes required for their measurement. Poult Sci, 59, 2237-2242.
  • Karkulín D (2006): Comparison of production and egg quality parameters of laying hens housed in conventional and enriched cages. Proceedings of EPC, 10-14.
  • Ledvinka Z, Zita L, Klesalová L (2012): Egg quality and some factors influencing it: a review. SAB, 43, 46-52.
  • Onbașılar EE, Avcılar ÖV (2011): The effects of age and oviposition time on egg weight and shell quality of brown layer. Lalahan Hayv Arașt Enst Derg, 51, 15-19.
  • Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, et al (2015): Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages. Poult Sci, 94, 559-564.
  • Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E (2018): Some egg quality traits of two laying hybrids kept in different cage systems. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 65, 51-55.
  • Pohle K, Cheng HW (2009): Comparative effects of furnished and battery cages on egg production and physiological parameters in White Leghorn hens. Poult Sci, 88, 2042-2051.
  • Réhault-Godbert S, Guyot N, Nys Y (2019): The golden egg: Nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health. Nutrients, 11, 684.
  • Short FJ, Walker AW, Elson A (2001): Eggshell density in furnished cages: effect of dustbath and perch provision. Brt Poult Sci, 42, 77-78.
  • Tůmová E, Ebeid T (2005): Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system. Czech J Anim Sci, 50, 129-134.
  • Tůmová E, Ledvinka AZ (2009): The effect of time of oviposition and age on egg weight, egg components weight and eggshell quality. Arch Geflugelkde, 73, 110-115.
  • Tůmová E, Zita L, Hubený M, et al (2007): The effect of oviposition time and genotype on egg quality characteristics in egg type hens. Czech J Anim Sci, 52, 26-30.
  • Yalçın SS, Yalçın S (2013): Poultry eggs and child health–a Review. Lohmann Inf, 48, 3-14.
  • Yalçın S, Yalçın S, Onbaşılar İ, et al (2014): Effects of dietary yeast cell wall on performance, egg quality and humoral immune response in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 61, 289-294.
  • Yalçın S, Eser H, Onbaşılar İ, et al (2016): Effects of dietary sepiolite on performance, egg quality and some blood parameters in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 63, 25-29.
  • Yenice G, Kaynar O, Ileriturk M, et al (2016): Quality of eggs in different production systems. Czech J Food Sci, 34, 370-376.
  • Yenilmez F, Uruk E, Serbester U, et al (2017): Effects of wholesaler and consumer conditions on egg quality parameters in different seasons. Çukurova Tar Gıda Bil Derg, 32, 61-68.

The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens

Yıl 2021, Cilt 68, Sayı 4, 329 - 336, 27.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.779272

Öz

Egg has valuable nutrients however; these nutrients may be affected by many factors. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on egg quality characteristics of laying hens. A total of 410 eggs were collected from unenriched and enriched cages in the morning and in the afternoon. After the eggs were weighed, they were stored at 21oC and 20% relative humidity until the 30th day of storage. It was determined that unenriched cage eggs had higher in shell breaking strength, albumen ash and pH & lipid of yolk and lower egg weight loss, yolk index & yolk color compared with enriched cage eggs. Morning eggs had the highest egg weight loss and the lowest egg weight, yolk height and yolk diameter. Dry matter & protein of albumen and dry matter & lipid of yolk were lower, while protein of yolk was higher in the morning eggs than those in the afternoon. It was observed that the storage period was important factor for egg quality characteristics. The effect of oviposition time and storage period interaction on egg quality should not be neglected. Interactions between cage type and storage period and between oviposition time and storage period were found statistically significant for some chemical composition of albumen and yolk. It is concluded that A quality egg criteria are preserved up to 14 days at an average temperature of 21°C and 20% humidity.

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy T, Yılmaz M, Tuna T (2001): The effect of oviposition time on egg quality and the possibility of estimating egg shell weight using a formula in commercial layers. Turk J Vet Anım Sci, 25, 811-816.
  • Akyurek H, Okur AA (2009): Effect of storage time, temperature and hen age on egg quality in free-range layer hens. J Anım Vet Adv, 8, 1953-1958.
  • Angelovičová M, Ševčíková V, Angelovič M, et al (2014): Comparison of two different breeding systems laying hens in relation to egg shell quality. J Anim Sci Biotechno, 47, 166-171.
  • AOAC (2000): Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
  • Ayorinde KL, Olagbuyiro B (1991): The influence of clutch size and oviposition time on egg weight and egg index in Hubbard layers. Bull Anim Health Prod Afr, 39, 251-253.
  • Batkowska J, Brodacki A, Knaga S (2014): Quality of laying hen eggs during storage depending on egg weight and type of cage system (conventional vs. furnished cages). Ann Anim Sci, 14, 707-719.
  • Campo J, Cigarroa F, Torres O (2015): Effect of oviposition time on egg quality characteristics. World's Poult Sci J, 71, 106.
  • Caner C, Yüceer M (2015): Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poult Sci, 94, 1665-1677.
  • Carpenter K, Clegg K (1956): The metabolizable energy of poultry feeding stuffs in relation to their chemical composition. J Sci Food Agri, 7, 45-51.
  • Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001): Basic and Clinical Biostatistics, 3rd ed. Lange Medical Books. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York.
  • Dikmen BY, Ipek A, Şahan Ü et al (2017): Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turk J Vet Anım Sci, 41, 77-84.
  • Hanusova E, Hrnčár C, Hanus A, et al (2015): Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotechn Zootechn, 18, 20-24.
  • Heldman DR (2011): Food preservation process design. Procedia Food Sci, 1, 685-689.
  • Hill AT, Hall JW (1980): Effects of various combinations of oil spraying, washing, sanitizing, storage time, strain, and age of layer upon albumen quality changes in storage and minimum sample sizes required for their measurement. Poult Sci, 59, 2237-2242.
  • Karkulín D (2006): Comparison of production and egg quality parameters of laying hens housed in conventional and enriched cages. Proceedings of EPC, 10-14.
  • Ledvinka Z, Zita L, Klesalová L (2012): Egg quality and some factors influencing it: a review. SAB, 43, 46-52.
  • Onbașılar EE, Avcılar ÖV (2011): The effects of age and oviposition time on egg weight and shell quality of brown layer. Lalahan Hayv Arașt Enst Derg, 51, 15-19.
  • Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, et al (2015): Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages. Poult Sci, 94, 559-564.
  • Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E (2018): Some egg quality traits of two laying hybrids kept in different cage systems. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 65, 51-55.
  • Pohle K, Cheng HW (2009): Comparative effects of furnished and battery cages on egg production and physiological parameters in White Leghorn hens. Poult Sci, 88, 2042-2051.
  • Réhault-Godbert S, Guyot N, Nys Y (2019): The golden egg: Nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health. Nutrients, 11, 684.
  • Short FJ, Walker AW, Elson A (2001): Eggshell density in furnished cages: effect of dustbath and perch provision. Brt Poult Sci, 42, 77-78.
  • Tůmová E, Ebeid T (2005): Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system. Czech J Anim Sci, 50, 129-134.
  • Tůmová E, Ledvinka AZ (2009): The effect of time of oviposition and age on egg weight, egg components weight and eggshell quality. Arch Geflugelkde, 73, 110-115.
  • Tůmová E, Zita L, Hubený M, et al (2007): The effect of oviposition time and genotype on egg quality characteristics in egg type hens. Czech J Anim Sci, 52, 26-30.
  • Yalçın SS, Yalçın S (2013): Poultry eggs and child health–a Review. Lohmann Inf, 48, 3-14.
  • Yalçın S, Yalçın S, Onbaşılar İ, et al (2014): Effects of dietary yeast cell wall on performance, egg quality and humoral immune response in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 61, 289-294.
  • Yalçın S, Eser H, Onbaşılar İ, et al (2016): Effects of dietary sepiolite on performance, egg quality and some blood parameters in laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 63, 25-29.
  • Yenice G, Kaynar O, Ileriturk M, et al (2016): Quality of eggs in different production systems. Czech J Food Sci, 34, 370-376.
  • Yenilmez F, Uruk E, Serbester U, et al (2017): Effects of wholesaler and consumer conditions on egg quality parameters in different seasons. Çukurova Tar Gıda Bil Derg, 32, 61-68.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Veteriner Hekimlik
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Ines TABIB (Sorumlu Yazar)
Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry
0000-0001-6555-0386
Türkiye


E. Ebru ONBAŞILAR
Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry
0000-0002-1321-0280
Türkiye


Suzan YALÇIN
Selçuk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology
0000-0002-3937-6705
Türkiye

Teşekkür Some part of this article was summarized from the first author’s master thesis.
Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Eylül 2021
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021, Cilt 68, Sayı 4

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { auvfd779272, journal = {Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {1308-2817}, address = {}, publisher = {Ankara Üniversitesi}, year = {2021}, volume = {68}, pages = {329 - 336}, doi = {10.33988/auvfd.779272}, title = {The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens}, key = {cite}, author = {Tabıb, Ines and Onbaşılar, E. Ebru and Yalçın, Suzan} }
APA Tabıb, I. , Onbaşılar, E. E. & Yalçın, S. (2021). The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi , 68 (4) , 329-336 . DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.779272
MLA Tabıb, I. , Onbaşılar, E. E. , Yalçın, S. "The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens" . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 68 (2021 ): 329-336 <http://vetjournal.ankara.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/65112/779272>
Chicago Tabıb, I. , Onbaşılar, E. E. , Yalçın, S. "The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 68 (2021 ): 329-336
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens AU - Ines Tabıb , E. Ebru Onbaşılar , Suzan Yalçın Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.779272 DO - 10.33988/auvfd.779272 T2 - Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 329 EP - 336 VL - 68 IS - 4 SN - -1308-2817 M3 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.779272 UR - https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.779272 Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens %A Ines Tabıb , E. Ebru Onbaşılar , Suzan Yalçın %T The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens %D 2021 %J Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi %P -1308-2817 %V 68 %N 4 %R doi: 10.33988/auvfd.779272 %U 10.33988/auvfd.779272
ISNAD Tabıb, Ines , Onbaşılar, E. Ebru , Yalçın, Suzan . "The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 68 / 4 (Eylül 2021): 329-336 . https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.779272
AMA Tabıb I. , Onbaşılar E. E. , Yalçın S. The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2021; 68(4): 329-336.
Vancouver Tabıb I. , Onbaşılar E. E. , Yalçın S. The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; 68(4): 329-336.
IEEE I. Tabıb , E. E. Onbaşılar ve S. Yalçın , "The effects of cage type, oviposition time and egg storage period on the egg quality characteristics of laying hens", Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 68, sayı. 4, ss. 329-336, Eyl. 2021, doi:10.33988/auvfd.779272