Öz
Kaynakça
- Flato R, Passanante GJ, Skalski MR, Patel DB, White EA, Matcuk GR Jr. The iliotibial tract: imaging, anatomy, injuries and other pathology. Skeletal Radiol 2017: 605-22.
- Kaplan EB. Some aspects of functional anatomy of the human knee joint. Clin Orthop 1962; 23: 18-29.
- Khaund R, Flynn, S. Iliotibial band syndrome: a common source of knee pain. Am Fam Physician 2005; 71: 1545-50.
- Güney B, Doğan E, Özdemir MY. Osteochondroma as a cause of ischiofemoral impingement- first case series. Acta Med Litu 2021; 28: 189-94.
- Bankaoglu M, Soydan Mahmutoglu A, Celebi I, et al. Association of iliotibial band friction syndrome with patellar height and facets variations: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Iran J Radiol 2018; 15: e63459.
- Hong JH, Kim JS. Diagnosis of iliotibial band friction syndrome and ultrasound guided steroid injection. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 387-91.
- Yan R, Huang Z, Wang L, Zhang X. MR manifestations and clinical significance of iliotibial band friction syndrome. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2014; 94: 1473-5.
- Ellis R, Hing W, Reid D. Iliotibial band friction syndrome--a systematic review. Man Ther 2007; 12: 200-8.
- Seeber GH, Wilhelm MP, Sizer PS Jr, et al. The tensile behaviors of the iliotibial band - a cadaveric investigation. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2020; 15: 451-9.
- Agridag Ucpinar B, Bankaoglu M, Eren OT, Erturk SM. Measurement of iliotibial band diameter in iliotibial band friction syndrome and comparison with an asymptomatic population. Acta Radiol 2021; 62: 1188-92.
- Park J, Cho HR, Kang KN, et al. The role of the iliotibial band cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter of the iliotibial band friction syndrome: a retrospective pilot study. Korean J Pain 2021; 34: 229-33.
- Ekman EF, Pope T, Martin DF, Curl WW. Magnetic resonance imaging of iliotibial band syndrome. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 851-4.
- Strauss EJ, Kim S, Calcei JG, Park D. Iliotibial band syndrome: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19: 728-36.
- Ferber R, Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis IS. Competitive female runners with a history of iliotibial band syndrome demonstrate atypical hip and knee kinematics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 52-8.
- Vasilevska V, Szeimies U, Stäbler A. Magnetic resonance imaging signs of iliotibial band friction in patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38: 871-5.
- Gyaran IA, Spiezia F, Hudson Z, Maffulli N. Sonographic measurement of iliotibial band thickness: an observational study in healthy adult volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 458-61.
Öz
Aim: The aim of our study is to evaluate the iliotibial band thickness (ITBT) and volume (ITBV) according to age and gender with 3 T MRI in a healthy Turkish population.
Material and Method: In the current study, 150 patients who had knee MRI were retrospectively evaluated. They were divided into the following groups to examine the effects of age: group 1: 18–30 years old; group 2: 31–40 years old; group 3: 41–50 years old; and group 4: 51–60 years old. ITBV measurements were performed on axial T2-weighted knee MR images.
Results: The mean age was 42.2±29.6 (range 18-60) years. The mean ITBT was 1.76±0.22 mm and the mean ITBV was 20,24±1,44 mm3 in all patients. There was statistically significant difference in mean iliotibial band thickness and volume between genders (p=0.001; p=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in mean iliotibial band thickness and volume values between the groups in the one-way ANOVA test (p >0.05).
Conclusion: Radiological studies on iliotibial band thickness and band area in healthy individuals are new in the literature. This study is the first radiological study in which the volume of the iliotibial band was measured in healthy individuals and was performed on a 3 tesla MR device. Also, it is the first study that is used artificial intelligence for iliotibial band evaluation and the technic is effective and more rapid according to our experience. ITBV and ITBT are statistically significantly higher in males than females. Most thick ITB was detected between the ages of 31-40. The values of our study, especially ITBT, differ from previous studies and the values are altered in a wide range. Therefore, standardization in the calculation is necessary. This topic is open to future research.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Artificial intelligence friction syndrome iliotibial band MRI scans
Kaynakça
- Flato R, Passanante GJ, Skalski MR, Patel DB, White EA, Matcuk GR Jr. The iliotibial tract: imaging, anatomy, injuries and other pathology. Skeletal Radiol 2017: 605-22.
- Kaplan EB. Some aspects of functional anatomy of the human knee joint. Clin Orthop 1962; 23: 18-29.
- Khaund R, Flynn, S. Iliotibial band syndrome: a common source of knee pain. Am Fam Physician 2005; 71: 1545-50.
- Güney B, Doğan E, Özdemir MY. Osteochondroma as a cause of ischiofemoral impingement- first case series. Acta Med Litu 2021; 28: 189-94.
- Bankaoglu M, Soydan Mahmutoglu A, Celebi I, et al. Association of iliotibial band friction syndrome with patellar height and facets variations: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Iran J Radiol 2018; 15: e63459.
- Hong JH, Kim JS. Diagnosis of iliotibial band friction syndrome and ultrasound guided steroid injection. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 387-91.
- Yan R, Huang Z, Wang L, Zhang X. MR manifestations and clinical significance of iliotibial band friction syndrome. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2014; 94: 1473-5.
- Ellis R, Hing W, Reid D. Iliotibial band friction syndrome--a systematic review. Man Ther 2007; 12: 200-8.
- Seeber GH, Wilhelm MP, Sizer PS Jr, et al. The tensile behaviors of the iliotibial band - a cadaveric investigation. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2020; 15: 451-9.
- Agridag Ucpinar B, Bankaoglu M, Eren OT, Erturk SM. Measurement of iliotibial band diameter in iliotibial band friction syndrome and comparison with an asymptomatic population. Acta Radiol 2021; 62: 1188-92.
- Park J, Cho HR, Kang KN, et al. The role of the iliotibial band cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter of the iliotibial band friction syndrome: a retrospective pilot study. Korean J Pain 2021; 34: 229-33.
- Ekman EF, Pope T, Martin DF, Curl WW. Magnetic resonance imaging of iliotibial band syndrome. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 851-4.
- Strauss EJ, Kim S, Calcei JG, Park D. Iliotibial band syndrome: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19: 728-36.
- Ferber R, Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis IS. Competitive female runners with a history of iliotibial band syndrome demonstrate atypical hip and knee kinematics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 52-8.
- Vasilevska V, Szeimies U, Stäbler A. Magnetic resonance imaging signs of iliotibial band friction in patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38: 871-5.
- Gyaran IA, Spiezia F, Hudson Z, Maffulli N. Sonographic measurement of iliotibial band thickness: an observational study in healthy adult volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 458-61.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 25 Ekim 2022 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 6 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.