Farklı Ortodontik ve Ortopedik Tedavilerin Temporomandibular Eklem Üzerindeki Etkileri

Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim; Seda Kotan

Derleme

Farklı Ortodontik ve Ortopedik Tedavilerin Temporomandibular Eklem Üzerindeki Etkileri

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 34 - 41, 17.12.2020

Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim Seda Kotan

Öz

Temporomandibular eklemin ortodonti ile ilişkisi geçmişten günümüze en çok tartışılan konulardan biri olmuştur. Günümüze kadar şekil değiştirerek çok sayıda literatüre konu olmaya devam etmektedir. Araştırmacılar özellikle 1980’lerin sonuna doğru ortodontik tedavilerin temporomandibular eklem üzerindeki olası iyatrojenik etkilerini daha ayrıntılı incelemeye başlamışlardır ve ortodontik tedavinin kondiller büyümeyle olan ilişkisini ve etkisini anlamlandırmaya çalışmışlardır. Büyüme gelişim dönemi devam eden veya biten hastalarda yapılan fonksiyonel ortopedik tedavi veya sabit ortodontik tedavi hastaya, farklı yönde işleyebilen bir stomatognatik sistem ve çiğneme fonksiyonu kazandırırken dolayısıyla temporomandibular eklem üzerinde de etkilere yol açabilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ortodontik tedavi, ortopedik tedavi, temporomandibular eklem

Kaynakça

1. Roth RH. The maintenance system and occlusal dynamics. Dent Clin North Am. 1976;20(4):761-88.
2. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion.7th ed. St Louis: Elsevier/Mosby; 2013.
3. Wolford LM, Mercuri LG, Schneiderman ED, Movahed R, Allen W. Twenty-year follow-up study on a patient-fitted temporomandibular joint prosthesis: the Techmedica/TMJ Concepts device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73(5):952-960.
4. Moon HJ, Lee YK. The relationship between dental occlusion/temporomandibular joint status and general body health: part 1. Dental occlusion and TMJ status exert an influence on general body health. J Altern Complement Med. 2011; 17(11):995-1000.
5. Thompson, JR. Abnormal function of the stomatognathic system and its orthodontic implications. Am J Orthod. 1962;48(10):758-765.
6. Martin D, Cocconi R. Orthodontic dental casts: the case for routine articulator mounting. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012: 141(1), 8-10.
7. McNamara JA Jr, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain. 1995;9(1):73-90.
8. Ricketts RM. Various conditions of the TMJ as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. Angle Orthod. 1952;22(8):98-115.
9. Watted N, Witt E, Kenn W. The temporomandibular joint and the disc condyle relationship after functional orthopaedic treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(6):683-93.
10. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. 2nd ed. Missouri: Mosby-Year Book, 1997.
11. Shen G, Hagg U, Darendeliler MA. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible removable vs. fixed functional appliances. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2005;8(1):2-10.
12. Cacho A, Martin C. Kinesiographic and sonographic changes in young Class II patients treated with functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacal Orthop. 2007; 131(2):196-201.
13. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol, McNamara J. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(5):599.
14. McNamara JA. Dentofacial adaptations in adults following functional regular therapy. Am J Orthod. 1984;85(1):57-71
15. Katsavrias EG. The effect of mandibular protrusive (activator) appliances on articular eminence morphology. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(6):647-53.
16. Voudouris JC, Woodside DG, Altuna G, Kuftinec MM, Angelopoulos G, Bourgue PJ. Condyle fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, Part 1. New technological methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;123(6):604-13.
17. Kanavakis G, Mehta N. The role of occlusal curvatures and maxillary arch dimensions in patients with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(1):96-101.
18. Greene CS. Relationship between occlusion and temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the orthodontist. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(1):11, 13, 15.
19. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic treatment of the class II noncompliant patient current principles and techniques. China: Mosby Elsevier, 2006.
20. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometricroentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(4):375-88.
21. Chintakanon K, Sampson W, Wilkinson T, Townsend G. A prospective study of Twin block appliance therapy assessed by Roth RH. The maintenance system and occlusal dynamics. Dent Clin North Am. 1976;20(4):761-88.
22. Franco AA, Yamashita HK, Lederman HM, Cevidanes LHS, Proffit WR, Vigorito JW. Frankel appliance therapy and the temporomandibular disc: A prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121(5):447-57.
23. Wyatt WE. Preventing adverse effects on the temporomandibular joint through orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1987;91(6):493-499.
24. Koski K. Cranial growth centers; fact or fallacies? Am J Orthod. 1968;54(8):566-83.
25. Mimura H, Deguchi T. Morphologic adaptation of temporomandibular joint after chincup therapy. Am J Orthod. 1996;110(5):541-546.
26. Huang X, Cen X, Lıu J. Effect of protraction facemask on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. BMC oral health. 2018; 18(1): 38.
27. Zurfluh MA, Kloukos D, Patcas R, Eliades T. Effect of chin-cup treatment on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(3):314-24.
28. Luther, F. TMD and occlusion part I. Damned if we do? Occlusion: the interface of dentistry and orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2007;202(1):E2-E2.
29. Katberg RW, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, Drake CM. Orthodontics and temporomandibular joint internal derangement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(5):515-520.
30. Tagkli, A, Paschalidi, P, Katsadouris A, Tsolakis AI. Relationship between orthodontics and temporomandibular disorders. Balkan Med J.2017; 21(3):127- 132.
31. Fallbericht E. Orthodontic diagnostics and treatment planning in adults with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63(5):435-45.
32. Artun J, Hollender LG, Truelove EL. Relationship between orthodontic treatment, condylar position and internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod. 1992;101(1):48-53.
33. Wani N, Nazir U, Bashir U, Safedabad B, Pradesh U. Assessment of role of Orthodontics in TMJ disorders. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2019;7(12): 33-36.
34. Maruo IT. Class II Division 2 subdivision left malocclusion associated with anterior deep overbite in an adult patient with temporomandibular disorder. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22(4):102-112.
35. Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P, Henriques J, Janson G. Relationship Between Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orthodontic Treatment: A Cross-sectional Study. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(4):411–417.
36. Akan S, Kocadereli I, Aktas A, Tasar F. Effects of maxillary molar intrusion with zygomatic anchorage on the stomatognathic system in anterior open bite patients. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(1):93-102.
37. Witzig JW. The Clinical Management of Basic Maxillofacial Orthopedic Appliances. Littleton, A: PSG Publishing; 1987.
38. Olsson M, Lindqvist B. Mandibular function before and after orth. treatment. Eur. J. Orth. 1995;17(3):205-214.
39. Ozkan H, Kucukkeles N. Condylar pathway changes following different treatment modalities. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25(5):477- 84.

Effects of Different Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatments on the Temporomandibular Joint

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 34 - 41, 17.12.2020

Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim Seda Kotan

Öz

The relationship of the temporomandibular joint with orthodontics has been one of the most controversial issues from past to present. It continues to be the subject of many literature by changing its shape until today. The researchers began to examine the possible iatrogenic effects of orthodontic treatments on the temporomandibular joint in more detail especially towards the end of the 1980s and tried to make sense of the relationship and effect of orthodontic treatment with condyle growth. While functional orthopedic treatment or fixed orthodontic treatment performed in patients whose growth and development period continues or ends, may provide the patient with a stomatognathic system and a chewing function that can operate in a different direction, thereby causing effects on the temporomandibular joint.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Orthodontic treatment, orthopedic treatment, temporomandibular joint

Kaynakça

1. Roth RH. The maintenance system and occlusal dynamics. Dent Clin North Am. 1976;20(4):761-88.
2. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion.7th ed. St Louis: Elsevier/Mosby; 2013.
3. Wolford LM, Mercuri LG, Schneiderman ED, Movahed R, Allen W. Twenty-year follow-up study on a patient-fitted temporomandibular joint prosthesis: the Techmedica/TMJ Concepts device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73(5):952-960.
4. Moon HJ, Lee YK. The relationship between dental occlusion/temporomandibular joint status and general body health: part 1. Dental occlusion and TMJ status exert an influence on general body health. J Altern Complement Med. 2011; 17(11):995-1000.
5. Thompson, JR. Abnormal function of the stomatognathic system and its orthodontic implications. Am J Orthod. 1962;48(10):758-765.
6. Martin D, Cocconi R. Orthodontic dental casts: the case for routine articulator mounting. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012: 141(1), 8-10.
7. McNamara JA Jr, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain. 1995;9(1):73-90.
8. Ricketts RM. Various conditions of the TMJ as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. Angle Orthod. 1952;22(8):98-115.
9. Watted N, Witt E, Kenn W. The temporomandibular joint and the disc condyle relationship after functional orthopaedic treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(6):683-93.
10. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. 2nd ed. Missouri: Mosby-Year Book, 1997.
11. Shen G, Hagg U, Darendeliler MA. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible removable vs. fixed functional appliances. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2005;8(1):2-10.
12. Cacho A, Martin C. Kinesiographic and sonographic changes in young Class II patients treated with functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacal Orthop. 2007; 131(2):196-201.
13. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol, McNamara J. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(5):599.
14. McNamara JA. Dentofacial adaptations in adults following functional regular therapy. Am J Orthod. 1984;85(1):57-71
15. Katsavrias EG. The effect of mandibular protrusive (activator) appliances on articular eminence morphology. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(6):647-53.
16. Voudouris JC, Woodside DG, Altuna G, Kuftinec MM, Angelopoulos G, Bourgue PJ. Condyle fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, Part 1. New technological methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;123(6):604-13.
17. Kanavakis G, Mehta N. The role of occlusal curvatures and maxillary arch dimensions in patients with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(1):96-101.
18. Greene CS. Relationship between occlusion and temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the orthodontist. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(1):11, 13, 15.
19. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic treatment of the class II noncompliant patient current principles and techniques. China: Mosby Elsevier, 2006.
20. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometricroentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(4):375-88.
21. Chintakanon K, Sampson W, Wilkinson T, Townsend G. A prospective study of Twin block appliance therapy assessed by Roth RH. The maintenance system and occlusal dynamics. Dent Clin North Am. 1976;20(4):761-88.
22. Franco AA, Yamashita HK, Lederman HM, Cevidanes LHS, Proffit WR, Vigorito JW. Frankel appliance therapy and the temporomandibular disc: A prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121(5):447-57.
23. Wyatt WE. Preventing adverse effects on the temporomandibular joint through orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1987;91(6):493-499.
24. Koski K. Cranial growth centers; fact or fallacies? Am J Orthod. 1968;54(8):566-83.
25. Mimura H, Deguchi T. Morphologic adaptation of temporomandibular joint after chincup therapy. Am J Orthod. 1996;110(5):541-546.
26. Huang X, Cen X, Lıu J. Effect of protraction facemask on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. BMC oral health. 2018; 18(1): 38.
27. Zurfluh MA, Kloukos D, Patcas R, Eliades T. Effect of chin-cup treatment on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(3):314-24.
28. Luther, F. TMD and occlusion part I. Damned if we do? Occlusion: the interface of dentistry and orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2007;202(1):E2-E2.
29. Katberg RW, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, Drake CM. Orthodontics and temporomandibular joint internal derangement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(5):515-520.
30. Tagkli, A, Paschalidi, P, Katsadouris A, Tsolakis AI. Relationship between orthodontics and temporomandibular disorders. Balkan Med J.2017; 21(3):127- 132.
31. Fallbericht E. Orthodontic diagnostics and treatment planning in adults with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63(5):435-45.
32. Artun J, Hollender LG, Truelove EL. Relationship between orthodontic treatment, condylar position and internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod. 1992;101(1):48-53.
33. Wani N, Nazir U, Bashir U, Safedabad B, Pradesh U. Assessment of role of Orthodontics in TMJ disorders. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2019;7(12): 33-36.
34. Maruo IT. Class II Division 2 subdivision left malocclusion associated with anterior deep overbite in an adult patient with temporomandibular disorder. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22(4):102-112.
35. Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P, Henriques J, Janson G. Relationship Between Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orthodontic Treatment: A Cross-sectional Study. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(4):411–417.
36. Akan S, Kocadereli I, Aktas A, Tasar F. Effects of maxillary molar intrusion with zygomatic anchorage on the stomatognathic system in anterior open bite patients. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(1):93-102.
37. Witzig JW. The Clinical Management of Basic Maxillofacial Orthopedic Appliances. Littleton, A: PSG Publishing; 1987.
38. Olsson M, Lindqvist B. Mandibular function before and after orth. treatment. Eur. J. Orth. 1995;17(3):205-214.
39. Ozkan H, Kucukkeles N. Condylar pathway changes following different treatment modalities. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25(5):477- 84.

Toplam 39 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Konular	Ortodonti ve Dentofasiyal Ortopedi
Bölüm	Derleme
Yazarlar	Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim Seda Kotan
Yayımlanma Tarihi	17 Aralık 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2020 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA	Çınarsoy Ciğerim, S., & Kotan, S. (2020). Farklı Ortodontik ve Ortopedik Tedavilerin Temporomandibular Eklem Üzerindeki Etkileri. Van Diş Hekimliği Dergisi, 1(1), 34-41.

Kapak Resmi İndir

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin