Letter to Editor
BibTex RIS Cite

A study on animal welfare standards in traditional sheep breeding enterprises

Year 2013, Volume: 60 Issue: 3, 201 - 207, 01.09.2013
https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting animal welfare such as housing, care and administration and some technical breeding applications in traditional sheep breeding enterprises in terms of animal welfare standards. After the generation of qualitative and quantitative variables an observation form was developed for the collection of data pertaining to the welfare standards of 100 sheep breeding enterprises in 19 villages of Şuhut, Emirdağ, Çay and Sultandağı towns of Afyonkarahisar province. Accordingly, it was determined that the average living area per sheep was 0.76 m2. The average temperature in the enterprises was detected as 21.06oC while the average moisture was calculated as 43.20%. Additionally, it was detected that the average birth rate per enterprise was 79.25%. Moreover, it was identified that no health control was conducted in 20% of the enterprises. It was also discovered that the average number of employees per enterprise was 4.57 person. In addition to this, it was determined that the employees of the enterprises had had no prior training on animal welfare

References

  • Anonymous: Animal Welfare Approved (AWA-2011) Standards for Sheep. Animal Welfare Institute. Washington, USA.
  • Anonymous: Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Sheep. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA-2000). UK Government Department.
  • Anonymous: Instrument for Pre-Accession Rural Development Programme (IPARD-2010). IPARD Projects 2010. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Anonymous: Livestock Guarding Dogs, Protecting Sheep from Predators, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-1999) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 588, Washington, USA.
  • Anonymous: Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals: The Sheep. Primary Industries Ministerial Council (PIMC-2006). Primary Industries Standing Committee Report 89, Australian Department of Agriculture, AU.
  • Anonymous: Welfare Standards for Beef Cattle. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA- 2010), West Sussex, UK.
  • Bozkurt Z, Sossidou EN, Kondrad S (2009): Evaluation of the Local Conditions and Personnel Initiatives to Improve Farm Animal Welfare in European Food Production Chain. Atay Basımevi, Afyonkarahisar.
  • Caroprese M, Casamassima D, Rassu SPG, Napolitano F, Sevi A (2009): Monitoring the on-farm welfare of sheep and goats. Ital J Anim Sci, 8, 343-354.
  • Caroprese M (2008): Sheep housing and welfare. Small Ruminant Res, 76, 21-25.
  • Casamassima D, Sevi A, Montemurro O (1993): Effect of light intensity on performance and behaviour of Comisana ewe-lambs intensively reared. Zoot Nutr. Anim. 19, 251–259.
  • Clark JA, McArthur AJ (1994): Thermal exchanges. In, Wathes CM, Charles DR (Eds.): Livestock Housing. s.97– 122, CAB International, Wallingford.
  • Curtis SE (1983): Environmental Management in Animal Agriculture. Iowa State Press, USA.
  • Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB (2008): Introduction to animal welfare and sheep. Dwyer CM (Ed): The welfare of sheep. s.1-36, Springer Science+Businnes Media B.V.
  • Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (2010): Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals. 2nd Edition, CAB International, Oxford, UK.
  • Hodgson J (1985): The control of herbage intake in grazing ruminant. P Nutr Soc, 44, 339-346.
  • Kara M, Arslan MÖ (2011): Kuzeydoğu Anadolu'da hayvanlarda ve insanlarda myiasis. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet Bil Derg, 6, 245-250.
  • Kellert SR, Berry JK (1987): Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. WildlifeSociety Bulletin, 15, 363-371.
  • Lia R, Pantone N (2001): Influenza delle infestazioni da strongilidi-gastrointestinali sulla produzione quanti qualitativa del latte negli allevamenti degli ovini condotti con sistemi tradizionali. Standing Seminar on Sheep milk quality, s. 81-91. Foggia, Italy.
  • Maria GA (2006): Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livest Sci, 103, 250–256.
  • Napolitano F, Cifuni GF, Pacelli C, Riviezzi AM, Girolami A (2002): Effect of artificial rearing on lamb welfare and meat quality. Meat Sci, 60, 307–315.
  • Penning PD, Parsons AJ, Orr RJ, Treacher TT (1991): Intake and behavior response by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under continuous stocking. Grass Forage Sci, 46, 15-28.
  • Sevi A, Casamassima D, Pulina G, Pazzona A (2009): Factors of welfare reduction in dairy sheep and goats. Ital J Anim Sci, 8, 81-101.
  • Sevi A, Massa S, Annicchiarico G, Dell’Aquila S, Muscio A (1999): Effect of stocking density on ewes milk yield and incidence of subclinical mastitis. J Dairy Res, 66, 489-499.
  • Sevi A, Taibi L, Albenzio M, Muscio A, Dell’Aquila S, Napolitano F (2001): Behavioral, adrenal, immune, and productive responses of lactating ewes to regrouping and relocation. J Anim Sci, 79, 1457-1465.
  • Tekerli M (2009): Koyunculukta Refah. In, Bozkurt Z (Ed): Çiftlik Hayvanları Refahı. Atay Basımevi, Afyonkarahisar.
  • Webster J (2006): Animal Welfare: Limping Towards Eden. Oxford, Blackwell Science. Geliş tarihi: 11.12.2012 / Kabul tarihi: 25.01.2013

Geleneksel yetiştiricilik yapılan koyunculuk işletmelerinde hayvan refahı standartları üzerine biraraştırma

Year 2013, Volume: 60 Issue: 3, 201 - 207, 01.09.2013
https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, geleneksel yetiştiricilik yapılan koyunculuk işletmelerinde hayvan refahını etkileyen barındırma, bakım ve idare ile bazı pratik yetiştirme işlemlerinin refah standartları yönünden değerlendirilmesidir. Refah standartlarına ilişkin verilerin toplanması için nicel ve nitel değişkenlerden oluşan gözlem formu geliştirilmiş ve Afyonkarahisar iline bağlı Şuhut, Emirdağ, Çay ve Sultandağı ilçelerindeki 19 köyde faaliyet gösteren toplam 100 koyunculuk işletmesinde uygulama gerçekleştirilmiştir. Buna göre, koyun başına ortalama alan 0.76 m2 belirlenmiştir. İşletmelerdeki ortalama sıcaklık 21.06 oC ve ortalama nem %43.20 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Diğer taraftan, işletme başına ortalama doğum oranının %79.25 olduğu ve işletmelerin %20’sinde herhangi bir sağlık kontrolü yapılmadığı saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, ortalama çalışan sayısının işletme başına 4.57 kişi olduğu ve hayvan refahına ilişkin daha önce herhangi bir eğitim almadıkları belirlenmiştir

References

  • Anonymous: Animal Welfare Approved (AWA-2011) Standards for Sheep. Animal Welfare Institute. Washington, USA.
  • Anonymous: Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Sheep. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA-2000). UK Government Department.
  • Anonymous: Instrument for Pre-Accession Rural Development Programme (IPARD-2010). IPARD Projects 2010. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Anonymous: Livestock Guarding Dogs, Protecting Sheep from Predators, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-1999) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 588, Washington, USA.
  • Anonymous: Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals: The Sheep. Primary Industries Ministerial Council (PIMC-2006). Primary Industries Standing Committee Report 89, Australian Department of Agriculture, AU.
  • Anonymous: Welfare Standards for Beef Cattle. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA- 2010), West Sussex, UK.
  • Bozkurt Z, Sossidou EN, Kondrad S (2009): Evaluation of the Local Conditions and Personnel Initiatives to Improve Farm Animal Welfare in European Food Production Chain. Atay Basımevi, Afyonkarahisar.
  • Caroprese M, Casamassima D, Rassu SPG, Napolitano F, Sevi A (2009): Monitoring the on-farm welfare of sheep and goats. Ital J Anim Sci, 8, 343-354.
  • Caroprese M (2008): Sheep housing and welfare. Small Ruminant Res, 76, 21-25.
  • Casamassima D, Sevi A, Montemurro O (1993): Effect of light intensity on performance and behaviour of Comisana ewe-lambs intensively reared. Zoot Nutr. Anim. 19, 251–259.
  • Clark JA, McArthur AJ (1994): Thermal exchanges. In, Wathes CM, Charles DR (Eds.): Livestock Housing. s.97– 122, CAB International, Wallingford.
  • Curtis SE (1983): Environmental Management in Animal Agriculture. Iowa State Press, USA.
  • Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB (2008): Introduction to animal welfare and sheep. Dwyer CM (Ed): The welfare of sheep. s.1-36, Springer Science+Businnes Media B.V.
  • Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (2010): Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals. 2nd Edition, CAB International, Oxford, UK.
  • Hodgson J (1985): The control of herbage intake in grazing ruminant. P Nutr Soc, 44, 339-346.
  • Kara M, Arslan MÖ (2011): Kuzeydoğu Anadolu'da hayvanlarda ve insanlarda myiasis. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet Bil Derg, 6, 245-250.
  • Kellert SR, Berry JK (1987): Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. WildlifeSociety Bulletin, 15, 363-371.
  • Lia R, Pantone N (2001): Influenza delle infestazioni da strongilidi-gastrointestinali sulla produzione quanti qualitativa del latte negli allevamenti degli ovini condotti con sistemi tradizionali. Standing Seminar on Sheep milk quality, s. 81-91. Foggia, Italy.
  • Maria GA (2006): Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livest Sci, 103, 250–256.
  • Napolitano F, Cifuni GF, Pacelli C, Riviezzi AM, Girolami A (2002): Effect of artificial rearing on lamb welfare and meat quality. Meat Sci, 60, 307–315.
  • Penning PD, Parsons AJ, Orr RJ, Treacher TT (1991): Intake and behavior response by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under continuous stocking. Grass Forage Sci, 46, 15-28.
  • Sevi A, Casamassima D, Pulina G, Pazzona A (2009): Factors of welfare reduction in dairy sheep and goats. Ital J Anim Sci, 8, 81-101.
  • Sevi A, Massa S, Annicchiarico G, Dell’Aquila S, Muscio A (1999): Effect of stocking density on ewes milk yield and incidence of subclinical mastitis. J Dairy Res, 66, 489-499.
  • Sevi A, Taibi L, Albenzio M, Muscio A, Dell’Aquila S, Napolitano F (2001): Behavioral, adrenal, immune, and productive responses of lactating ewes to regrouping and relocation. J Anim Sci, 79, 1457-1465.
  • Tekerli M (2009): Koyunculukta Refah. In, Bozkurt Z (Ed): Çiftlik Hayvanları Refahı. Atay Basımevi, Afyonkarahisar.
  • Webster J (2006): Animal Welfare: Limping Towards Eden. Oxford, Blackwell Science. Geliş tarihi: 11.12.2012 / Kabul tarihi: 25.01.2013
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Veterinary Surgery
Other ID JA88SS62MH
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

İbrahim Kılıç

Zehra Bozkurt

Mustafa Tekerli

Serdar Koçak

Koray Çelikeloğlu

Publication Date September 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013Volume: 60 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Kılıç, İ., Bozkurt, Z., Tekerli, M., Koçak, S., et al. (2013). A study on animal welfare standards in traditional sheep breeding enterprises. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 60(3), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579
AMA Kılıç İ, Bozkurt Z, Tekerli M, Koçak S, Çelikeloğlu K. A study on animal welfare standards in traditional sheep breeding enterprises. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. September 2013;60(3):201-207. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579
Chicago Kılıç, İbrahim, Zehra Bozkurt, Mustafa Tekerli, Serdar Koçak, and Koray Çelikeloğlu. “A Study on Animal Welfare Standards in Traditional Sheep Breeding Enterprises”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 60, no. 3 (September 2013): 201-7. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579.
EndNote Kılıç İ, Bozkurt Z, Tekerli M, Koçak S, Çelikeloğlu K (September 1, 2013) A study on animal welfare standards in traditional sheep breeding enterprises. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 60 3 201–207.
IEEE İ. Kılıç, Z. Bozkurt, M. Tekerli, S. Koçak, and K. Çelikeloğlu, “A study on animal welfare standards in traditional sheep breeding enterprises”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 201–207, 2013, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579.
ISNAD Kılıç, İbrahim et al. “A Study on Animal Welfare Standards in Traditional Sheep Breeding Enterprises”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 60/3 (September 2013), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579.
JAMA Kılıç İ, Bozkurt Z, Tekerli M, Koçak S, Çelikeloğlu K. A study on animal welfare standards in traditional sheep breeding enterprises. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2013;60:201–207.
MLA Kılıç, İbrahim et al. “A Study on Animal Welfare Standards in Traditional Sheep Breeding Enterprises”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 60, no. 3, 2013, pp. 201-7, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002579.
Vancouver Kılıç İ, Bozkurt Z, Tekerli M, Koçak S, Çelikeloğlu K. A study on animal welfare standards in traditional sheep breeding enterprises. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2013;60(3):201-7.