Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi
Letter to Editor
PDF BibTex RIS Cite

Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus)

Year 2012, Volume: 59 Issue: 1, 5 - 9, 01.03.2012

Burcu ONUK Murat KABAK

https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493

Abstract

In this study, six adult long-legged buzzards (Buteo rufinus) weighing 1000-1200 g and five adult geese (Anser anser domesticus) weighing 4500-5000 g with different feeding patterns were used. Goose has eight masticatory muscles named as m. adductor mandibula externus, m. adductor ossis quadrati, m. depressor mandibula, m. pterygoideus, m. pseudotemporalis profundus, m. pseudotemporalis superficialis, m. protractor pterygoidei and m. protractor quadrati. Due to the absence of m. pseudotemporalis profundus, long-legged buzzard has seven masticatory muscles. Differences has been detected between these species in means of some muscle’s origo and insertio and their parts. In goose, m. adductor mandibula externus was formed from three parts, named as pars rostralis, pars ventralis and pars profunda, but in long-legged buzzard it is formed by two parts named as pars rostralis and pars profunda. While m. depressor mandibula was constituted from two parts in goose, the same muscle was observed as a single part in long-legged buzzard. Furthermore, in the goose, m. pterygoideus was detected as having three parts named as pars ventralis, pars intermedialis and pars dorsalis, but in long-legged buzzard it was formed by only one part which is thicker compared to the other masticatory muscles

Keywords

Anatomy, goose, long-legged buzzard, masticatory muscle

References

  • Aspinall V, O’Reilly M (2004) Birds Introduction to Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology. Butterworth Heinemann. Edinburg. London. Toronto.
  • Bahadır A (2002) Hareket sistemi. 1-53. In: N Dursun (Ed), Evcil Kuşların Anatomisi. Medisan Publisher, Ankara.
  • Baumel JJ, King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (1993) Nomina Anatomica Avium. Cambridge, MA: Nuttall Ornithological Club.
  • Bout RG, Zweers GA (2001) The role of cranial kinesis in birds, Comp Biochem Physiol, 131, 197-205.
  • Getty R (1975) Sisson and Grossman’s the Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 5th edn., WB Saunders Company. New York.
  • George JC, Berger AJ (1966) Avian Myology II. Head and Visceral Compartment of the Neck. Academic press, London.
  • Gussekloo SWS, Bout RG (2005) The kinematics of feeding and drinking in palaeognathous birds in relation to cranial morphology. J Exp Biol, 208, 3395-3407.
  • Holliday CM, Witmer LM (2007) Archosaur adductor chamber evolution: integrationof musculoskeletal and topological criteria in jaw muscle homology. J Morphol, 268, 457–484.
  • King AS, McLelland J (1984) Birds: Their Structure and Function, 2nd edn. London: Bailliere Tindall.
  • Meij MAA van der, BoutRG (2004) Scaling of jaw muscle size and maximal bite force in finches. J Exp Biol, 207, 2745-2753.
  • Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E (1977) Anatomy of the Domestic Birds. Berlin-Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey.
  • Orhan İO, Kabak M (2006) Facial bones of long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus) Anat Histol Embryol, 35, 211–216.
  • O’Malley B (2005) Clinical Anatomy and Physiology of Exotic Species, Structure and Function of Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, and Amphibians. 1st edn., Elsevier Saunders, Toronto.
  • Tokita M (2004) Morphogenesis of parrot jaw muscles: Understanding the development of an evolutionary novelty. J Morphol. 259, 69–81.

Kaz (Anser anser domesticus) ve kızıl şahin’de (Buteo rufinus) çiğneme kaslarının karşılaştırmalıolarak incelenmesi

Year 2012, Volume: 59 Issue: 1, 5 - 9, 01.03.2012

Burcu ONUK Murat KABAK

https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın materyalini farklı beslenme alışkanlığına sahip 6 adet 1000-1200 gr ağırlığında kızıl şahin (Buteo rufinus) ile 5 adet 4500-5000 gr ağırlığında ergin evcil kaz (Anser anser domesticus) oluşturdu. Çiğneme kasları kazda m. adductor mandibula externus, m. adductor ossis quadrati, m. depressor mandibula, m. pterygoideus, m. pseudotemporalis profundus, m. pseudotemporalis superficialis, m. protractor pterygoidei ve m. protractor quadrati olmak üzere toplam sekiz adet, kızıl şahinde ise m. pseudotemporalis profundus’un bulunmaması nedeniyle yedi adet olarak belirlendi. İncelenen türlerde bu kaslardan bazılarının parçaları ile origo ve insertiosunda da farklılıklar saptandı. Kazda m. adductor mandibula externus, pars rostralis, pars ventralis ve pars profunda olmak üzere üç parça iken kızıl şahinde pars rostralis ve pars profunda olmak üzere iki kısımdı. Musculus depressor mandibula kazda iki parçadan oluşurken kızıl şahin’de ise sadece bir parçaydı. Bunlardan başka m. pterygoideus, kazda pars ventralis, pars intermedialis ve pars dorsalis olmak üzere üç kısımdı. Fakat aynı kas kızıl şahin’de diğer kaslarıyla karşılaştırıldığında oldukça kalın olan tek parçalı bir kas olarak belirlendi

Keywords

Anatomi, çiğneme kası, kaz, kızıl şahin

References

  • Aspinall V, O’Reilly M (2004) Birds Introduction to Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology. Butterworth Heinemann. Edinburg. London. Toronto.
  • Bahadır A (2002) Hareket sistemi. 1-53. In: N Dursun (Ed), Evcil Kuşların Anatomisi. Medisan Publisher, Ankara.
  • Baumel JJ, King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (1993) Nomina Anatomica Avium. Cambridge, MA: Nuttall Ornithological Club.
  • Bout RG, Zweers GA (2001) The role of cranial kinesis in birds, Comp Biochem Physiol, 131, 197-205.
  • Getty R (1975) Sisson and Grossman’s the Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 5th edn., WB Saunders Company. New York.
  • George JC, Berger AJ (1966) Avian Myology II. Head and Visceral Compartment of the Neck. Academic press, London.
  • Gussekloo SWS, Bout RG (2005) The kinematics of feeding and drinking in palaeognathous birds in relation to cranial morphology. J Exp Biol, 208, 3395-3407.
  • Holliday CM, Witmer LM (2007) Archosaur adductor chamber evolution: integrationof musculoskeletal and topological criteria in jaw muscle homology. J Morphol, 268, 457–484.
  • King AS, McLelland J (1984) Birds: Their Structure and Function, 2nd edn. London: Bailliere Tindall.
  • Meij MAA van der, BoutRG (2004) Scaling of jaw muscle size and maximal bite force in finches. J Exp Biol, 207, 2745-2753.
  • Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E (1977) Anatomy of the Domestic Birds. Berlin-Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey.
  • Orhan İO, Kabak M (2006) Facial bones of long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus) Anat Histol Embryol, 35, 211–216.
  • O’Malley B (2005) Clinical Anatomy and Physiology of Exotic Species, Structure and Function of Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, and Amphibians. 1st edn., Elsevier Saunders, Toronto.
  • Tokita M (2004) Morphogenesis of parrot jaw muscles: Understanding the development of an evolutionary novelty. J Morphol. 259, 69–81.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Veterinary Surgery
Other ID JA34JT75GF
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Burcu ONUK

Murat KABAK

Publication Date March 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012Volume: 59 Issue: 1

Cite

Bibtex @letter to editor { auvfd555859, journal = {Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1300-0861}, eissn = {1308-2817}, address = {}, publisher = {Ankara University}, year = {2012}, volume = {59}, number = {1}, pages = {5 - 9}, doi = {10.1501/Vetfak\_0000002493}, title = {Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus)}, key = {cite}, author = {Onuk, Burcu and Kabak, Murat} }
APA Onuk, B. & Kabak, M. (2012). Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus) . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi , 59 (1) , 5-9 . DOI: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493
MLA Onuk, B. , Kabak, M. "Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus)" . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 59 (2012 ): 5-9 <http://vetjournal.ankara.edu.tr/en/pub/issue/44728/555859>
Chicago Onuk, B. , Kabak, M. "Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus)". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 59 (2012 ): 5-9
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus) AU - BurcuOnuk, MuratKabak Y1 - 2012 PY - 2012 N1 - doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493 DO - 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493 T2 - Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 5 EP - 9 VL - 59 IS - 1 SN - 1300-0861-1308-2817 M3 - doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493 UR - https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493 Y2 - 2023 ER -
EndNote %0 Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus) %A Burcu Onuk , Murat Kabak %T Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus) %D 2012 %J Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1300-0861-1308-2817 %V 59 %N 1 %R doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493 %U 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493
ISNAD Onuk, Burcu , Kabak, Murat . "Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus)". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 59 / 1 (March 2012): 5-9 . https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493
AMA Onuk B. , Kabak M. Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus). Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2012; 59(1): 5-9.
Vancouver Onuk B. , Kabak M. Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012; 59(1): 5-9.
IEEE B. Onuk and M. Kabak , "Comparative study of masticatory muscles in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) and the long-legged buzzard (Buteo rufinus)", Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 5-9, Mar. 2012, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002493