BibTex RIS Cite

Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retros-pektif değerlendirilmesi

Year 2005, Volume: 52 Issue: 1, 45 - 48, 01.03.2005

Alper Çiftci Tuba İça Barış Sareyyüpoğlu H. Kaan Müştak

Abstract

Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarının retrospektif değerlendirilmesi amacıyla yapılan bu çalışmada, 1998-2003 yılları arasında Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı’na dermatofitoz şüphesi ile getirilen 164 kedi ve 357 köpekten alınan örnekler incelendi. Dermatofitoz şüpheli örneklerden toplamda %20.3 olmak üzere, kedilerden %21.9 ve köpeklerden ise %19.6 oranında dermatofitoz etkenleri izole ve identifiye edildi. Kedi ve köpeklerde Microsporum spp.’nin izolasyon oranı (%60.4), Trichophyton spp.’den (%39.6) daha yüksek olarak bulundu. Ayrıca, mevsimsel olarak dermatofitoz oluşumunda farklılığa rastlanmadı

Keywords

Dermatofitoz kedi köpek

References

  • Aho R (1980): Studies on fungal flora in hair from domestic and laboratory animals suspected of dermatophytosis. I. Dematophytes. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [B], 88, 79-83.
  • Arda M (2000): Preparat ve Kültür Hazırlama Yöntemle- ri. 356-357. In: M Arda, Temel Mikrobiyoloji. 2.Baskı. Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Badillet G (1977): Population of Paris and dermatophytes transmitted by animals. Boll Soc Fr Mycol Med, 6, 109- 114.
  • Barbee ML, Taylor JW (1992): Detecting morphological convergence in true fungi, using 18S rRNA gene sequence data. BioSystems, 28, 117-125.
  • Bourdzi-Hatzopoulou E (1978): Zooanthroponoses in Greece. Epidemiology of dermatophytosis. Scientific Yearbook of the Veteriner Faculty (1978-1979), 19, 195- 258.
  • Cabanes FJ, Abarca ML, Bragulat MR (1997): Dermatopytes isolated from domestic animals in Barcelona,Spain. Mycopathol, 137, 107-113.
  • Caretta G, Mancianti F, Ajello L (1989): Dermatophytes and keratinophilic fungi in cats and dogs. Mycoses, 32, 620-626.
  • Haseqawa M, Lida Y, Yano T, Takaiwa F, Iwabuchi M (1985): Phylogenetic relationships among eukaryotic kingdoms inferred from ribosomal RNA Sequences. J Mol Evol, 22, 32-38.
  • Kaplan W, Georg LK, Ajello L (1958): Recent developments in animal ringworm and their public health implications.Ann NY Acad Sci, 70, 636-649.
  • Khosravi AR, Mahmoudi M (2003): Dermatophytes isolated from domestic animals in Iran. Mycoses, 46, 222- 226.
  • Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC (1997): Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5. Ed. Lippincott-Raven publishers. Philedelphia. pp:983-985.
  • Kristensen S, Krogh HV (1981): A study of skin diseases in dogs and cat. VII. Ringworm infection. Nord Vet Med, 33, 134-140.
  • Mancianti F, Nardoni S, Cecchi S, Corazza M, Taccini F (2002): Dermatophytes isolated from symptomatic dogs and cats in Tuscany, Italy during 15-year-period. Mycopathol, 156, 13-18.
  • Moriello KA (2001): Diagnostic techniques for dermatophytes. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract, 16, 219-224
  • Pintori G, Cubeddu GM, Giola L, Pellegrini M (1986): Dermatomycosis of the cat and dog. Boll Assoc It Vet Piccol Animal, 25, 307-312.
  • Radford A (1993): A fungal phylogeny based upon orotodine 5’-monophosphate decarboxylase. J Mol Evol, 36, 385-395.
  • Sparkes AH, Gruffydd-Jones TJ, Shaw SE, Wright AI, Stokes CR (1993): Epidemiological and diagnostic features of canine and feline dermatophytes in the UK from 1956 to 1991. Vet Rec, 133, 57-61.
  • Stenwig H (1985): Isolation of dermatophytes from domestic animals in Norway. Nord Vet Med, 37, 161-169.
  • Weitzman I, Summerbell RC (1995): The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev, 8, 240-259.
  • Zaror L, Casas S, Martin R, Thibaut J, Fischman O (1988): Dermatophytes in healthy dogs and cats in Valdivia, Chile. Arch Vet Med, 20, 140-143. Geliş tarihi: 19.04.2004 / Kabul tarihi: 13.05.2004

Retrospective evaluation of dermatophytosis in cats and dogs

Year 2005, Volume: 52 Issue: 1, 45 - 48, 01.03.2005

Alper Çiftci Tuba İça Barış Sareyyüpoğlu H. Kaan Müştak

Abstract

For the aim of retrospective evaluation of dermatophytosis in cats and dogs, in this study, the samples taken from 164 cats and 357 dogs which came to University of Ankara, Faculty of Veterinary, Department of Microbiology with dermatophytosis suspicion between the year 1998 and 2003, were investigated. Overall, the 20.3% of the suspicious samples, in cats 21.9% and in dogs 19.6% dermatophytosis agents were isolated and identified. Microsporum spp. found to be the most isolated agent (60.4%) and Trichophyton spp. (39.6%) was also isolated as the agent of dermatophytosis. This study shows no difference of any seasonal trend in dermatophytosis

Keywords

Cat dermatophytosis dog

References

  • Aho R (1980): Studies on fungal flora in hair from domestic and laboratory animals suspected of dermatophytosis. I. Dematophytes. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [B], 88, 79-83.
  • Arda M (2000): Preparat ve Kültür Hazırlama Yöntemle- ri. 356-357. In: M Arda, Temel Mikrobiyoloji. 2.Baskı. Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Badillet G (1977): Population of Paris and dermatophytes transmitted by animals. Boll Soc Fr Mycol Med, 6, 109- 114.
  • Barbee ML, Taylor JW (1992): Detecting morphological convergence in true fungi, using 18S rRNA gene sequence data. BioSystems, 28, 117-125.
  • Bourdzi-Hatzopoulou E (1978): Zooanthroponoses in Greece. Epidemiology of dermatophytosis. Scientific Yearbook of the Veteriner Faculty (1978-1979), 19, 195- 258.
  • Cabanes FJ, Abarca ML, Bragulat MR (1997): Dermatopytes isolated from domestic animals in Barcelona,Spain. Mycopathol, 137, 107-113.
  • Caretta G, Mancianti F, Ajello L (1989): Dermatophytes and keratinophilic fungi in cats and dogs. Mycoses, 32, 620-626.
  • Haseqawa M, Lida Y, Yano T, Takaiwa F, Iwabuchi M (1985): Phylogenetic relationships among eukaryotic kingdoms inferred from ribosomal RNA Sequences. J Mol Evol, 22, 32-38.
  • Kaplan W, Georg LK, Ajello L (1958): Recent developments in animal ringworm and their public health implications.Ann NY Acad Sci, 70, 636-649.
  • Khosravi AR, Mahmoudi M (2003): Dermatophytes isolated from domestic animals in Iran. Mycoses, 46, 222- 226.
  • Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC (1997): Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5. Ed. Lippincott-Raven publishers. Philedelphia. pp:983-985.
  • Kristensen S, Krogh HV (1981): A study of skin diseases in dogs and cat. VII. Ringworm infection. Nord Vet Med, 33, 134-140.
  • Mancianti F, Nardoni S, Cecchi S, Corazza M, Taccini F (2002): Dermatophytes isolated from symptomatic dogs and cats in Tuscany, Italy during 15-year-period. Mycopathol, 156, 13-18.
  • Moriello KA (2001): Diagnostic techniques for dermatophytes. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract, 16, 219-224
  • Pintori G, Cubeddu GM, Giola L, Pellegrini M (1986): Dermatomycosis of the cat and dog. Boll Assoc It Vet Piccol Animal, 25, 307-312.
  • Radford A (1993): A fungal phylogeny based upon orotodine 5’-monophosphate decarboxylase. J Mol Evol, 36, 385-395.
  • Sparkes AH, Gruffydd-Jones TJ, Shaw SE, Wright AI, Stokes CR (1993): Epidemiological and diagnostic features of canine and feline dermatophytes in the UK from 1956 to 1991. Vet Rec, 133, 57-61.
  • Stenwig H (1985): Isolation of dermatophytes from domestic animals in Norway. Nord Vet Med, 37, 161-169.
  • Weitzman I, Summerbell RC (1995): The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev, 8, 240-259.
  • Zaror L, Casas S, Martin R, Thibaut J, Fischman O (1988): Dermatophytes in healthy dogs and cats in Valdivia, Chile. Arch Vet Med, 20, 140-143. Geliş tarihi: 19.04.2004 / Kabul tarihi: 13.05.2004
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Alper Çiftci

Tuba İça

Barış Sareyyüpoğlu

H. Kaan Müştak

Publication Date March 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005Volume: 52 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çiftci, A., İça, T., Sareyyüpoğlu, B., Müştak, H. K. (2005). Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retros-pektif değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 52(1), 45-48.
AMA Çiftci A, İça T, Sareyyüpoğlu B, Müştak HK. Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retros-pektif değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. March 2005;52(1):45-48.
Chicago Çiftci, Alper, Tuba İça, Barış Sareyyüpoğlu, and H. Kaan Müştak. “Kedi Ve köpek dermatofitozlarından Izole Edilen mantarların Retros-Pektif değerlendirilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 52, no. 1 (March 2005): 45-48.
EndNote Çiftci A, İça T, Sareyyüpoğlu B, Müştak HK (March 1, 2005) Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retros-pektif değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 52 1 45–48.
IEEE A. Çiftci, T. İça, B. Sareyyüpoğlu, and H. K. Müştak, “Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retros-pektif değerlendirilmesi”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2005.
ISNAD Çiftci, Alper et al. “Kedi Ve köpek dermatofitozlarından Izole Edilen mantarların Retros-Pektif değerlendirilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 52/1 (March 2005), 45-48.
JAMA Çiftci A, İça T, Sareyyüpoğlu B, Müştak HK. Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retros-pektif değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2005;52:45–48.
MLA Çiftci, Alper et al. “Kedi Ve köpek dermatofitozlarından Izole Edilen mantarların Retros-Pektif değerlendirilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 52, no. 1, 2005, pp. 45-48.
Vancouver Çiftci A, İça T, Sareyyüpoğlu B, Müştak HK. Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retros-pektif değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2005;52(1):45-8.