Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 67 Issue: 2, 161 - 168, 03.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391

Abstract

References

  • 1. Bärmann EV, Wronski T, Lerp H, et al. (2013): Morphometric and genetic framework for Gazella. Zoo J Linnean Soc, 169, 673-696.
  • 2. Best KC, Garvin HM, Cabo LL (2018): An investigation into the relationship between human cranial and pelvic sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Sci, 63, 990-1000.
  • 3. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al. (1982): Volume determinations using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 138, 329-333.
  • 4. Chanpanitkitchote P, Tangphokhanon W, Nomsiri R, et al. (2015): Ratio of cranial and skull volumes in 25 mammalian species. Vet Integr Sci, 13, 165-177.
  • 5. Christiansen P, Harris JM (2012): Variation in craniomandibular morphology and sexual dimorphism in Pantherines and the Sabercat Smilodon fatalis. PLoS One, 7, e48352.
  • 6. Fandos P, Vigal CR (1993): Sexual dimorphism in size of the skull of Spanish ibex Capra pyrenaica. Acta Theriol, 33, 103-111.
  • 7. Groves CP (1983): Notes on the gazelles IV: the Arabian gazelles collected by Hemprich and Ehrenberg. Z Saugetierkd, 48, 371–381.
  • 8. Hasan HA (2017): Three dimensional computed tomography morphometric analysis of the orbit in Iraqi population. Int Med J, 24, 147-149.
  • 9. Hayatgheib D, Karami M, Farahmand H, et al. (2011): Morphological study and comparison of western and eastern goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa: Guldenstaedt, 1780) populations in Iran. Int J Environ Res, 5, 225-232.
  • 10. Ince NG, Demircioglu I, Yılmaz B, et al. (2018): Martılarda (Laridae spp.) cranium’un üç boyutlu modellemesi. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg, 7, 98-101.
  • 11. Jaslow JR (1989): Sexual dimorphism of cranial suture complexity in wild sheep (Ovis orientalis). Zoo J Linnean Soc, 95, 273-284.
  • 12. Kamal S (2006): Morphological and craniometrical studies on the skull of Kagani goat (Capra hircus) of Jammu region. Int J Morphol, 24, 449-455.
  • 13. Kanchan T, Krishan K, Gupta A, et al. (2014): A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population. J Craniofac Surg, 25, 1645-1649.
  • 14. Karimi I, Onar V, Pazvan G, et al. (2011): The cranial morphometric and morphologic characteristics of Mehraban sheep in Western Iran. Glob Vet, 6, 111-117.
  • 15. Kataba A (2010): Biometric and morphologic characteristics of the skull of the Gwembe Valley Dwarf Goat (Capra Hircus) breed of Zambia. MSc, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • 16. Kranioti EF (2019): Radiometry versus osteometry in sex assessment: a study of the Cretan radius. Aust J Forensic Sci, 51, 135-148.
  • 17. Krupa P, Krsek P, Cernochova P, et al. (2004): 3D real modelling and CT biomodels application in facial surgery. In: Neuroradiology, Springer, Berlin.
  • 18. Leslie DM (2010): Procapra picticaudata (Artiodactyla: Bovidae). Mamm Species, 42, 138-148.
  • 19. Mallon DP, Kingswood SC (2001): Antelopes. Part 4: North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Global Survey and Regional Action Plans. SSC Antelope Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  • 20. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (2017): International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (ICVGAN), Published by the Editorial Committee, Hannover.
  • 21. Özcan S, Aksoy G, Kürtül İ, et al. (2010): A comparative morphometric study on the skull of the Tuj and Morkaraman sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 111-114.
  • 22. Özkurt A (2002): Üç boyutlu örneksel veriden yüzey modeli üretimi. DEUFMD, 4, 27–36.
  • 23. Páral V, Tichý F, Fabiś M (2004): Functional structure of metapodial bones in Cattle. Acta Vet Brno, 73, 413-420.
  • 24. Parés I, Casanova PM, Kamal S, et al. (2010): On biometrical aspects of the cephalic anatomy of Xisqueta sheep (Catalunya, Spain). Int J Morpol, 28, 347-351.
  • 25. Parés-Casanova PM (2014): Osteometric study of the Rasquera White goat. J Appl Anim Res, 42, 177-185.
  • 26. Tecirlioğlu S (1983): Sırtlan ve köpeğin iskelet kemikleri üzerinde makro-Anatomik araştırmalar. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 30, 149-166.
  • 27. Teo EC, Holsgrove T, Haiblikova S (2017): 3D Morphometric analysis of human vertebrae C3-T3 using CT images reconstruction. J Spine, 6, 391.
  • 28. Thouless CR, Al Bassri KA (1991): Taxonomic status of the Farasan island gazelle. J Zool Lond, 223, 151-159.
  • 29. Von Den Driesch A (1976): A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • 30. Wronski T, Sandouka M, Plath M, et al. (2010): Differences in sexual dimorphism among four gazelle taxa (Gazella spp.) in the Middle East. Animal Biol, 60, 395-412.
  • 31. Zhu L. (2012): Craniometrical studies on the skull of Tibetan Gazelle (Procapra Picticaudata). Int J Morphol, 30, 196-198.

Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)

Year 2020, Volume: 67 Issue: 2, 161 - 168, 03.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the osteometric features of the skull by using three dimensional computed tomography images in gazelles (Gazelle subgutturosa). In the study, nine skull samples of adult gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) were used. Images of the skull sections of 0.625 mm thickness were acquired by using a computer tomography device with 64 detectors applying 80 kV, 200 mA and 639 mGY. Three-dimensional images of the skull samples were reconstructed and morphometric measurements (39 linear, 1 volumetric and 1 surface area) were performed by using the software program MIMICS 12.1. Mean skull volumes in males and females were found to be 115.74±2.43 cm3 and 87.69±1.09 cm3 while the mean skull surface areas in males and females were 79.62±8.56 cm2 and 77.34±1.18 cm2, respectively. Significant differences between males and females for median frontal length (MFL), frontal length (FRL), upper neurocranium length (UNCL), greatest length of the lacrimal bone (GLLB), oral palatal length (OPL), length of the upper molar row (LUMR) and the greatest neurocranium breadth (GNCB) were observed. The difference in the cranial index between males and females was statistically significant (P<0.01). The data obtained in this study will contribute to detect differences between the gazelles and other species with respect to skull morphometry.

References

  • 1. Bärmann EV, Wronski T, Lerp H, et al. (2013): Morphometric and genetic framework for Gazella. Zoo J Linnean Soc, 169, 673-696.
  • 2. Best KC, Garvin HM, Cabo LL (2018): An investigation into the relationship between human cranial and pelvic sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Sci, 63, 990-1000.
  • 3. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al. (1982): Volume determinations using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 138, 329-333.
  • 4. Chanpanitkitchote P, Tangphokhanon W, Nomsiri R, et al. (2015): Ratio of cranial and skull volumes in 25 mammalian species. Vet Integr Sci, 13, 165-177.
  • 5. Christiansen P, Harris JM (2012): Variation in craniomandibular morphology and sexual dimorphism in Pantherines and the Sabercat Smilodon fatalis. PLoS One, 7, e48352.
  • 6. Fandos P, Vigal CR (1993): Sexual dimorphism in size of the skull of Spanish ibex Capra pyrenaica. Acta Theriol, 33, 103-111.
  • 7. Groves CP (1983): Notes on the gazelles IV: the Arabian gazelles collected by Hemprich and Ehrenberg. Z Saugetierkd, 48, 371–381.
  • 8. Hasan HA (2017): Three dimensional computed tomography morphometric analysis of the orbit in Iraqi population. Int Med J, 24, 147-149.
  • 9. Hayatgheib D, Karami M, Farahmand H, et al. (2011): Morphological study and comparison of western and eastern goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa: Guldenstaedt, 1780) populations in Iran. Int J Environ Res, 5, 225-232.
  • 10. Ince NG, Demircioglu I, Yılmaz B, et al. (2018): Martılarda (Laridae spp.) cranium’un üç boyutlu modellemesi. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg, 7, 98-101.
  • 11. Jaslow JR (1989): Sexual dimorphism of cranial suture complexity in wild sheep (Ovis orientalis). Zoo J Linnean Soc, 95, 273-284.
  • 12. Kamal S (2006): Morphological and craniometrical studies on the skull of Kagani goat (Capra hircus) of Jammu region. Int J Morphol, 24, 449-455.
  • 13. Kanchan T, Krishan K, Gupta A, et al. (2014): A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population. J Craniofac Surg, 25, 1645-1649.
  • 14. Karimi I, Onar V, Pazvan G, et al. (2011): The cranial morphometric and morphologic characteristics of Mehraban sheep in Western Iran. Glob Vet, 6, 111-117.
  • 15. Kataba A (2010): Biometric and morphologic characteristics of the skull of the Gwembe Valley Dwarf Goat (Capra Hircus) breed of Zambia. MSc, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • 16. Kranioti EF (2019): Radiometry versus osteometry in sex assessment: a study of the Cretan radius. Aust J Forensic Sci, 51, 135-148.
  • 17. Krupa P, Krsek P, Cernochova P, et al. (2004): 3D real modelling and CT biomodels application in facial surgery. In: Neuroradiology, Springer, Berlin.
  • 18. Leslie DM (2010): Procapra picticaudata (Artiodactyla: Bovidae). Mamm Species, 42, 138-148.
  • 19. Mallon DP, Kingswood SC (2001): Antelopes. Part 4: North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Global Survey and Regional Action Plans. SSC Antelope Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  • 20. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (2017): International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (ICVGAN), Published by the Editorial Committee, Hannover.
  • 21. Özcan S, Aksoy G, Kürtül İ, et al. (2010): A comparative morphometric study on the skull of the Tuj and Morkaraman sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 111-114.
  • 22. Özkurt A (2002): Üç boyutlu örneksel veriden yüzey modeli üretimi. DEUFMD, 4, 27–36.
  • 23. Páral V, Tichý F, Fabiś M (2004): Functional structure of metapodial bones in Cattle. Acta Vet Brno, 73, 413-420.
  • 24. Parés I, Casanova PM, Kamal S, et al. (2010): On biometrical aspects of the cephalic anatomy of Xisqueta sheep (Catalunya, Spain). Int J Morpol, 28, 347-351.
  • 25. Parés-Casanova PM (2014): Osteometric study of the Rasquera White goat. J Appl Anim Res, 42, 177-185.
  • 26. Tecirlioğlu S (1983): Sırtlan ve köpeğin iskelet kemikleri üzerinde makro-Anatomik araştırmalar. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 30, 149-166.
  • 27. Teo EC, Holsgrove T, Haiblikova S (2017): 3D Morphometric analysis of human vertebrae C3-T3 using CT images reconstruction. J Spine, 6, 391.
  • 28. Thouless CR, Al Bassri KA (1991): Taxonomic status of the Farasan island gazelle. J Zool Lond, 223, 151-159.
  • 29. Von Den Driesch A (1976): A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • 30. Wronski T, Sandouka M, Plath M, et al. (2010): Differences in sexual dimorphism among four gazelle taxa (Gazella spp.) in the Middle East. Animal Biol, 60, 395-412.
  • 31. Zhu L. (2012): Craniometrical studies on the skull of Tibetan Gazelle (Procapra Picticaudata). Int J Morphol, 30, 196-198.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Veterinary Surgery
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Bestami Yılmaz 0000-0002-0901-3129

İsmail Demircioğlu 0000-0002-0724-3019

Faruk Bozkaya 0000-0001-6423-8067

Nazan Gezer İnce 0000-0003-1627-5757

Publication Date March 3, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020Volume: 67 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yılmaz, B., Demircioğlu, İ., Bozkaya, F., Gezer İnce, N. (2020). Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 67(2), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391
AMA Yılmaz B, Demircioğlu İ, Bozkaya F, Gezer İnce N. Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. March 2020;67(2):161-168. doi:10.33988/auvfd.594391
Chicago Yılmaz, Bestami, İsmail Demircioğlu, Faruk Bozkaya, and Nazan Gezer İnce. “Three-Dimensional Tomographic Reconstruction and Morphometric Analysis of Skull in Gazelles (Gazella Subgutturosa)”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67, no. 2 (March 2020): 161-68. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391.
EndNote Yılmaz B, Demircioğlu İ, Bozkaya F, Gezer İnce N (March 1, 2020) Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67 2 161–168.
IEEE B. Yılmaz, İ. Demircioğlu, F. Bozkaya, and N. Gezer İnce, “Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 161–168, 2020, doi: 10.33988/auvfd.594391.
ISNAD Yılmaz, Bestami et al. “Three-Dimensional Tomographic Reconstruction and Morphometric Analysis of Skull in Gazelles (Gazella Subgutturosa)”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67/2 (March 2020), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391.
JAMA Yılmaz B, Demircioğlu İ, Bozkaya F, Gezer İnce N. Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020;67:161–168.
MLA Yılmaz, Bestami et al. “Three-Dimensional Tomographic Reconstruction and Morphometric Analysis of Skull in Gazelles (Gazella Subgutturosa)”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 67, no. 2, 2020, pp. 161-8, doi:10.33988/auvfd.594391.
Vancouver Yılmaz B, Demircioğlu İ, Bozkaya F, Gezer İnce N. Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020;67(2):161-8.