Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 67 Issue: 4, 335 - 342, 01.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.478778

Abstract

References

  • 1. Adıgüzel Işık S, Aksoy AR (2015): Bafra koyununun (Sakız × Karayaka G1) Kazım Karabekir Tarım İşletmesi şartlarında büyüme özellikleri. Van Vet J, 26, 93-99.
  • 2. Akçapınar H (2000): Koyun Yetiştiriciliği. İsmat Press, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 3. Akçapinar H, Özbeyaz C, Ünal N, et al. (2000): The possibilities of developing dam and sire lines using Akkaraman, Sakız and Kıvırcık sheep breeds for lamb production I. Fertility in Akkaraman sheep, survival rate and growth characteristics of Sakız × Akkaraman F1 and Kıvırcık × Akkaraman F1 lambs. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 24, 71-79.
  • 4. Akçapinar H, Ünal N (2011): Bafra Koyunu. 143-148. In: Proocedings of Samsun Symposium, Samsun, Turkey.
  • 5. Akçapinar H, Ünal N, Atasoy F, et al. (2002): Karayaka ve Bafra (Sakız × Karayaka G1) koyunlarının Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü şartlarına uyum kabiliyeti. Lalahan Hay Arş Enst Derg, 42, 11-24.
  • 6. Anonymous (2005): SPSS Software, Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, Statistical Innovations Inc (Version 14.01, No: 9869264), USA.
  • 7. Anonymous (2018): Food and Agricultural Organization, (FAO), Livestock Primary. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data. (Accessed May 26, 2018).
  • 8. Anonymous (2018): Turkish Statistical Institute (TUİK), Number of livestock. Available at: www.tuik.gov.tr. (Accessed May 26, 2018).
  • 9. Borg RC (2007): Phenotypic and genetic evaluation of fitness characteristics in sheep under a range environment. Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal and Poultry Sciences. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
  • 10. Dellal G (2002): Akkaraman ve Anadolu Merinosu Koyunlarında Çevre ve Kalıtım Faktörlerinin Kuzu Verimi Özelliklerine Etkileri. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 26, 581-586.
  • 11. Dwyer MC (2003): Behavioural development in the neonatal lamb: effect of maternal and birth-related factors. Theriogenology, 59, 1027-1050.
  • 12. Ertuğrul, M, Dellal, G, Soysal, İ, et al. (2009): Türkiye Yerli Koyun Irklarının Korunması. Bursa Uludağ Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg, 23, 97-119.
  • 13. Gaudin S, Chaillou E, Cornilleau F, et al (2015): Daughters are more strongly attached to their mother than sons: a possible mechanism for early social segregation. Anim Behav, 102, 33-43.
  • 14. Kiliç İ, Özbeyaz C (2011): Classification of Karayaka and Bafra (Chios × Karayaka B1) sheep according to body measurements by different clustering methods. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 58, 203-208.
  • 15. Morris CA, Hickey SM, Clarke JN (2000): Genetic and environmental factors affecting lamb survival at birth and through to weaning. New Zeal J Agr Res, 43, 515-524.
  • 16. Notter DR (2000): Effects of ewe age and season of lambing on prolicacy in US Targhee, Suffolk, and Polypay sheep. Small Ruminant Res, 38, 1-7.
  • 17. Özcan M, Altınel A, Yılmaz A, et al (2001): Studies on the possibility of improving lamb production by two-way and three-way crossbreeding with German Black-Headed Mutton, Kıvırcık and Chios sheep breeds. 1. Fertility, lamb survival and growth of lambs. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 25, 687-694.
  • 18. Scaramuzzi RJ, Radfod HM (1983): Factors regulating ovulation rate in the ewe. J Report Fert, 69, 353-367.
  • 19. Seibert B, Gauly M, Erhardt G (2004): Productivity of different sheep breeds in extensive pasture management. Arch. Tierz Dummerstorf, 47, 142-152.
  • 20. Ünal N, Akçapinar H, Atasoy F, et al (2006): Some reproductive and growth traits of crossbred genotypes produced by crossing local sheep breds of Kıvırcık × White Karaman and Chios × White Karaman in Steppe conditions. Arch Tierz Dummerstorf, 49, 55-63.
  • 21. Ünal N, Akçapinar H, Atasoy F, et al (2008): Some udder traits and growth of lambs and phenotypic correlations between those of traits with milking traits and milk production measured by various milk estimation methods in Bafra sheep. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 55, 117-124.
  • 22. Ünal N, Akçapinar H, Atasoy F, et al (2008): Milk yield and milking traits measured with different methods in Bafra sheep. Rev Med Vet, 159, 494-501.
  • 23. Ünal N, Atasoy F, Akçapinar H, et al (2002): Fertility traits, survival rate and growth characteristics of Karayaka and Bafra (Chios × Karayaka B1) genotypes. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 27, 265-272.
  • 24. Yakan A, Ünal N (2010): Meat production traits of a new sheep breed called Bafra in Turkey 1. Fattening, slaughter and carcass characteristics of lambs. Trop Anim Health Prod, 42, 751-759.
  • 25. Yakan A, Ünal N (2010): Meat production traits of a new sheep breed called Bafra in Turkey 2. Meat quality characteristics of lambs. Trop Anim Health Prod, 42, 743-750.

Some production characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 sheep genotypes

Year 2020, Volume: 67 Issue: 4, 335 - 342, 01.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.478778

Abstract

The present study was carried out to identify the reproductive characteristics, survival rate, growth traits and some body measurements of Bafra (B), Akkaraman (A), Bafra × Akkaraman F1 (BAF1) and Bafra × Akkaraman B1 (BAB1) sheep genotypes. The research was performed at Gözlü State Farm, belonging to the General Directorate of Agricultural Enterprise (TİGEM), during the years of 2014-2016. In the study, lambing rates of B×B, A×A, B×A and B×BAF1 mating groups were 55.25, 69.97, 67.25 and 64.91%; the lamb production were 92.27, 88.93, 87.54 and 122.81% and the litter sizes were 1.67, 1.27, 1.30 and 1.89, respectively. The survival rates of B, A, BAF1 and BAB1 lambs were calculated as 89.89, 94.23, 88.79 and 98.36% in the 90th day, respectively (P<0.05). The least square means of these lambs were 3.65±0.05, 4.71±0.07, 4.56±0.06 and 4.03±0.10 kg (P<0.001) for birth weight and 23.51±0.30, 31.39±0.37, 30.00±0.35 and 25.16±0.53 kg (P<0.001) for the 90th day weight (weaning weight), respectively. Body measurements of these genotypes on the 90th day were 56.79±0.45, 61.75±0.54, 60.98±0.59 and 61.73±0.62 cm (P<0.001) for the withers height; 55.76±0.32, 55.18±0.39, 56.91±0.42 and 57.43±0.45 cm (P<0.01) for the body length; 63.05±0.73, 71.88±0.89, 60.89±0.96 and 61.92±1.02 cm (P<0.001) for the chest girth; and 16.63±0.50, 40.45±0.62, 28.33±0.67 and 18.33±0.70 cm (P<0.001) for the widest tail circumference, respectively. In conclusion, the reproductive performance of the BAF1 genotype was satisfactory; BAF1 lambs were partially similar to A lambs, but BAB1 lambs were partially similar to B lambs in terms of growth characteristics.

References

  • 1. Adıgüzel Işık S, Aksoy AR (2015): Bafra koyununun (Sakız × Karayaka G1) Kazım Karabekir Tarım İşletmesi şartlarında büyüme özellikleri. Van Vet J, 26, 93-99.
  • 2. Akçapınar H (2000): Koyun Yetiştiriciliği. İsmat Press, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 3. Akçapinar H, Özbeyaz C, Ünal N, et al. (2000): The possibilities of developing dam and sire lines using Akkaraman, Sakız and Kıvırcık sheep breeds for lamb production I. Fertility in Akkaraman sheep, survival rate and growth characteristics of Sakız × Akkaraman F1 and Kıvırcık × Akkaraman F1 lambs. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 24, 71-79.
  • 4. Akçapinar H, Ünal N (2011): Bafra Koyunu. 143-148. In: Proocedings of Samsun Symposium, Samsun, Turkey.
  • 5. Akçapinar H, Ünal N, Atasoy F, et al. (2002): Karayaka ve Bafra (Sakız × Karayaka G1) koyunlarının Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü şartlarına uyum kabiliyeti. Lalahan Hay Arş Enst Derg, 42, 11-24.
  • 6. Anonymous (2005): SPSS Software, Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, Statistical Innovations Inc (Version 14.01, No: 9869264), USA.
  • 7. Anonymous (2018): Food and Agricultural Organization, (FAO), Livestock Primary. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data. (Accessed May 26, 2018).
  • 8. Anonymous (2018): Turkish Statistical Institute (TUİK), Number of livestock. Available at: www.tuik.gov.tr. (Accessed May 26, 2018).
  • 9. Borg RC (2007): Phenotypic and genetic evaluation of fitness characteristics in sheep under a range environment. Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal and Poultry Sciences. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
  • 10. Dellal G (2002): Akkaraman ve Anadolu Merinosu Koyunlarında Çevre ve Kalıtım Faktörlerinin Kuzu Verimi Özelliklerine Etkileri. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 26, 581-586.
  • 11. Dwyer MC (2003): Behavioural development in the neonatal lamb: effect of maternal and birth-related factors. Theriogenology, 59, 1027-1050.
  • 12. Ertuğrul, M, Dellal, G, Soysal, İ, et al. (2009): Türkiye Yerli Koyun Irklarının Korunması. Bursa Uludağ Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg, 23, 97-119.
  • 13. Gaudin S, Chaillou E, Cornilleau F, et al (2015): Daughters are more strongly attached to their mother than sons: a possible mechanism for early social segregation. Anim Behav, 102, 33-43.
  • 14. Kiliç İ, Özbeyaz C (2011): Classification of Karayaka and Bafra (Chios × Karayaka B1) sheep according to body measurements by different clustering methods. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 58, 203-208.
  • 15. Morris CA, Hickey SM, Clarke JN (2000): Genetic and environmental factors affecting lamb survival at birth and through to weaning. New Zeal J Agr Res, 43, 515-524.
  • 16. Notter DR (2000): Effects of ewe age and season of lambing on prolicacy in US Targhee, Suffolk, and Polypay sheep. Small Ruminant Res, 38, 1-7.
  • 17. Özcan M, Altınel A, Yılmaz A, et al (2001): Studies on the possibility of improving lamb production by two-way and three-way crossbreeding with German Black-Headed Mutton, Kıvırcık and Chios sheep breeds. 1. Fertility, lamb survival and growth of lambs. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 25, 687-694.
  • 18. Scaramuzzi RJ, Radfod HM (1983): Factors regulating ovulation rate in the ewe. J Report Fert, 69, 353-367.
  • 19. Seibert B, Gauly M, Erhardt G (2004): Productivity of different sheep breeds in extensive pasture management. Arch. Tierz Dummerstorf, 47, 142-152.
  • 20. Ünal N, Akçapinar H, Atasoy F, et al (2006): Some reproductive and growth traits of crossbred genotypes produced by crossing local sheep breds of Kıvırcık × White Karaman and Chios × White Karaman in Steppe conditions. Arch Tierz Dummerstorf, 49, 55-63.
  • 21. Ünal N, Akçapinar H, Atasoy F, et al (2008): Some udder traits and growth of lambs and phenotypic correlations between those of traits with milking traits and milk production measured by various milk estimation methods in Bafra sheep. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 55, 117-124.
  • 22. Ünal N, Akçapinar H, Atasoy F, et al (2008): Milk yield and milking traits measured with different methods in Bafra sheep. Rev Med Vet, 159, 494-501.
  • 23. Ünal N, Atasoy F, Akçapinar H, et al (2002): Fertility traits, survival rate and growth characteristics of Karayaka and Bafra (Chios × Karayaka B1) genotypes. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 27, 265-272.
  • 24. Yakan A, Ünal N (2010): Meat production traits of a new sheep breed called Bafra in Turkey 1. Fattening, slaughter and carcass characteristics of lambs. Trop Anim Health Prod, 42, 751-759.
  • 25. Yakan A, Ünal N (2010): Meat production traits of a new sheep breed called Bafra in Turkey 2. Meat quality characteristics of lambs. Trop Anim Health Prod, 42, 743-750.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Veterinary Surgery
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ömer Faruk Güngör 0000-0002-7273-7242

Necmettin Ünal 0000-0001-5250-7063

Publication Date September 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020Volume: 67 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Güngör, Ö. F., & Ünal, N. (2020). Some production characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 sheep genotypes. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 67(4), 335-342. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.478778
AMA Güngör ÖF, Ünal N. Some production characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 sheep genotypes. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. September 2020;67(4):335-342. doi:10.33988/auvfd.478778
Chicago Güngör, Ömer Faruk, and Necmettin Ünal. “Some Production Characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 Sheep Genotypes”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67, no. 4 (September 2020): 335-42. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.478778.
EndNote Güngör ÖF, Ünal N (September 1, 2020) Some production characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 sheep genotypes. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67 4 335–342.
IEEE Ö. F. Güngör and N. Ünal, “Some production characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 sheep genotypes”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 335–342, 2020, doi: 10.33988/auvfd.478778.
ISNAD Güngör, Ömer Faruk - Ünal, Necmettin. “Some Production Characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 Sheep Genotypes”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67/4 (September 2020), 335-342. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.478778.
JAMA Güngör ÖF, Ünal N. Some production characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 sheep genotypes. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020;67:335–342.
MLA Güngör, Ömer Faruk and Necmettin Ünal. “Some Production Characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 Sheep Genotypes”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 67, no. 4, 2020, pp. 335-42, doi:10.33988/auvfd.478778.
Vancouver Güngör ÖF, Ünal N. Some production characteristics of Bafra, Akkaraman, Bafra × Akkaraman F1 and B1 sheep genotypes. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020;67(4):335-42.

Cited By