Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 67 Issue: 4, 413 - 418, 01.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.674702

Abstract

References

  • 1. Al-Waili NS, Salom K, Butler G, et al (2011): Honey and microbial infections: a review supporting the use of honey for microbial control. J Med Food 14, 1079-1096.
  • 2. Anonymus (2015): The Turkish Beekeeping and Honey Sector. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Global Agricultural Information Network. GAIN report Avaliable at https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/turkey-turkish-beekeeping-and-honey-sector. (Accessed June 20, 2019)
  • 3. Anthimidou E, Mossialos D (2013): Antibacterial activity of Greek and Cypriot honeys against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison to manuka honey. J Med Food 16, 42-47.
  • 4. Basson NJ, Grobler SR (2008): Antimicrobial activity of two South African honeys produced from indigenous Leucospermum cordifolium and Erica species on selected microorganisms. BMC Complem Altern M 8, 41.
  • 5. Bizerra FC, Da Silva Junior PI, Hayashi MA (2012): Exploring the antibacterial properties of honey and its potential. Front Microbiol 3, 398.
  • 6. Blair SE, Carter DA (2005): The potential for honey in the management of wounds and infection. Healthcare Inf 10, 24-31.
  • 7. Bogdanov S (2012): Honey as nutrient and functional food. Proteins 1100, 1400-2700.
  • 8. Bogdanov S, Jurendic T, Sieber R, et al (2008): Honey for nutrition and health: a review. J Am Coll Nutr 27, 677-689.
  • 9. Burns DT, Dillon A, Warren J, et al (2018): A critical review of the factors available for the ıdentification and determination of Mānuka honey. Food Anal Method 11, 1561–1567.
  • 10. Casey JT, O'Cleirigh C, Walsh PK, et al (2004): Development of a robust microtiter plate-based assay method for assessment of bioactivity. J Microbiol Meth 58, 327-334.
  • 11. Chen C, Campbell L, Blair SE, et al (2012): The effect of standard heat and filtration processing procedures on antimicrobial activity and hydrogen peroxide levels in honey. Front Microbiol 3, 265.
  • 12. Deng J, Liu R, Lu Q, et al (2018): Biochemical properties, antibacterial and cellular antioxidant activities of buckwheat honey in comparison to manuka honey. Food Chem 252, 243-249.
  • 13. Korkmaz SD, Kuplulu O, Cil GI, et al (2017): Detection of sulfonamide and tetracycline antibiotic residues in Turkish pine honey. Int J Food Prop 20, 50-55.
  • 14. Kwakman PHS, Van den Akker JPC, Güçlü A, et al (2008): Medical-grade honey kills antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro and eradicates skin colonization. Clin Infect Dis 46, 1677-1682.
  • 15. Kwakman PH, Zaat SA (2012): Antibacterial components of honey. IUBMB Life 64, 48-55.
  • 16. Kwakman PH, te Velde AA, de Boer L, et al (2010): How honey kills bacteria. FASEB J 24, 2576-2582.
  • 17. Lin SM, Molan PC, Cursons RT (2011): The controlled in vitro susceptibility of gastrointestinal pathogens to the antibacterial effect of manuka honey. Eur J Clin Microbiol 30, 569-574.
  • 18. Lusby PE, Coombes AL, Wilkinson JM (2005): Bactericidal activity of different honeys against pathogenic bacteria. Arch Med Res 36, 464-467.
  • 19. Mandal MD, Mandal S (2011): Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Med 1, 154.
  • 20. Matzen RD, Zinck Leth-Espensen J, Jansson T, et al (2018): The antibacterial effect ın vitro of honey derived from various Danish flora. Dermatol Res Pract 2018, 1-10.
  • 21. Mercan N, Guvensen A, Celik A, et al (2007): Antimicrobial activity and pollen composition of honey samples collected from different provinces in Turkey. Nat Prod Res 21, 187-195.
  • 22. Molan P (2001): Why honey is effective as a medicine: 2. The scientific explanation of its effects. Bee World. 82, 22-40.
  • 23. Patton T, Barrett J, Brennan J, et al (2006): Use of a spectrophotometric bioassay for determination of microbial sensitivity to manuka honey. J Microbiol Meth 64, 84-95.
  • 24. Ramos OY, Salomón V, Libonatti C, et al (2018): Effect of botanical and physicochemical composition of Argentinean honeys on the inhibitory action against food pathogens. LWT Food Sci Technol 87, 457-463.
  • 25. Sagdic O, Silici S, Ekici L (2013): Evaluation of the phenolic content, antiradical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activity of different floral sources of honey. Int J Food Prop 16, 658-666.
  • 26. Shamala TR, Jyothi YPS, Saibaba P (2002): Antibacterial effect of honey on the in vitro and in vivo growth of Escherichia coli. World J Microb Biot 18, 863-865.
  • 27. Tan HT, Rahman RA, Gan SH, et al (2009): The antibacterial properties of Malaysian tualang honey against wound and enteric microorganisms in comparison to manuka honey. BMC Complem Altern M 9, 34.
  • 28. Tuksitha L, Chen YLS, Chen YL, et al (2018): Antioxidant and antibacterial capacity of stingless bee honey from Borneo (Sarawak). J Asia-Pac Entomol 21, 563-570.
  • 29. Wilkinson JM, Cavanagh HM (2005): Antibacterial activity of 13 honeys against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Food 8, 100-103.
  • 30. Zainol MI, Yusoff KM, Yusof MYM (2013): Antibacterial activity of selected Malaysian honey. BMC Complem Altern M 13, 129.

Antibacterial activity of Turkish honey against selected foodborne pathogens

Year 2020, Volume: 67 Issue: 4, 413 - 418, 01.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.674702

Abstract

Honey is an important animal product that is consumed by people of all ages and has become an important antimicrobial agent because it has both antibacterial properties and does not cause microbial resistance. Although, Turkey is among the most important honey producers of the world, there are not enough studies about the antibacterial activity of Turkish honey. According to their geographical area, honey exhibit considerable and variable antimicrobial activity. In this study, we investigated the in vitro antibacterial effect of honey obtained from Turkey, against Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus by using agar dilution, agar well diffusion and disc diffusion methods and compared the efficacy of these methods. Results showed the antibacterial effects of Turkish honey, collected from different regions against selected pathogens. Different concentrations of all honey samples displayed an antibacterial activity. Each microorganism exhibited different sensitivity to the honey tested. In addition, a significant difference was detected between the three methods for each microorganism and well diffusion method was found to be the most sensitive method.

References

  • 1. Al-Waili NS, Salom K, Butler G, et al (2011): Honey and microbial infections: a review supporting the use of honey for microbial control. J Med Food 14, 1079-1096.
  • 2. Anonymus (2015): The Turkish Beekeeping and Honey Sector. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Global Agricultural Information Network. GAIN report Avaliable at https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/turkey-turkish-beekeeping-and-honey-sector. (Accessed June 20, 2019)
  • 3. Anthimidou E, Mossialos D (2013): Antibacterial activity of Greek and Cypriot honeys against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison to manuka honey. J Med Food 16, 42-47.
  • 4. Basson NJ, Grobler SR (2008): Antimicrobial activity of two South African honeys produced from indigenous Leucospermum cordifolium and Erica species on selected microorganisms. BMC Complem Altern M 8, 41.
  • 5. Bizerra FC, Da Silva Junior PI, Hayashi MA (2012): Exploring the antibacterial properties of honey and its potential. Front Microbiol 3, 398.
  • 6. Blair SE, Carter DA (2005): The potential for honey in the management of wounds and infection. Healthcare Inf 10, 24-31.
  • 7. Bogdanov S (2012): Honey as nutrient and functional food. Proteins 1100, 1400-2700.
  • 8. Bogdanov S, Jurendic T, Sieber R, et al (2008): Honey for nutrition and health: a review. J Am Coll Nutr 27, 677-689.
  • 9. Burns DT, Dillon A, Warren J, et al (2018): A critical review of the factors available for the ıdentification and determination of Mānuka honey. Food Anal Method 11, 1561–1567.
  • 10. Casey JT, O'Cleirigh C, Walsh PK, et al (2004): Development of a robust microtiter plate-based assay method for assessment of bioactivity. J Microbiol Meth 58, 327-334.
  • 11. Chen C, Campbell L, Blair SE, et al (2012): The effect of standard heat and filtration processing procedures on antimicrobial activity and hydrogen peroxide levels in honey. Front Microbiol 3, 265.
  • 12. Deng J, Liu R, Lu Q, et al (2018): Biochemical properties, antibacterial and cellular antioxidant activities of buckwheat honey in comparison to manuka honey. Food Chem 252, 243-249.
  • 13. Korkmaz SD, Kuplulu O, Cil GI, et al (2017): Detection of sulfonamide and tetracycline antibiotic residues in Turkish pine honey. Int J Food Prop 20, 50-55.
  • 14. Kwakman PHS, Van den Akker JPC, Güçlü A, et al (2008): Medical-grade honey kills antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro and eradicates skin colonization. Clin Infect Dis 46, 1677-1682.
  • 15. Kwakman PH, Zaat SA (2012): Antibacterial components of honey. IUBMB Life 64, 48-55.
  • 16. Kwakman PH, te Velde AA, de Boer L, et al (2010): How honey kills bacteria. FASEB J 24, 2576-2582.
  • 17. Lin SM, Molan PC, Cursons RT (2011): The controlled in vitro susceptibility of gastrointestinal pathogens to the antibacterial effect of manuka honey. Eur J Clin Microbiol 30, 569-574.
  • 18. Lusby PE, Coombes AL, Wilkinson JM (2005): Bactericidal activity of different honeys against pathogenic bacteria. Arch Med Res 36, 464-467.
  • 19. Mandal MD, Mandal S (2011): Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Med 1, 154.
  • 20. Matzen RD, Zinck Leth-Espensen J, Jansson T, et al (2018): The antibacterial effect ın vitro of honey derived from various Danish flora. Dermatol Res Pract 2018, 1-10.
  • 21. Mercan N, Guvensen A, Celik A, et al (2007): Antimicrobial activity and pollen composition of honey samples collected from different provinces in Turkey. Nat Prod Res 21, 187-195.
  • 22. Molan P (2001): Why honey is effective as a medicine: 2. The scientific explanation of its effects. Bee World. 82, 22-40.
  • 23. Patton T, Barrett J, Brennan J, et al (2006): Use of a spectrophotometric bioassay for determination of microbial sensitivity to manuka honey. J Microbiol Meth 64, 84-95.
  • 24. Ramos OY, Salomón V, Libonatti C, et al (2018): Effect of botanical and physicochemical composition of Argentinean honeys on the inhibitory action against food pathogens. LWT Food Sci Technol 87, 457-463.
  • 25. Sagdic O, Silici S, Ekici L (2013): Evaluation of the phenolic content, antiradical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activity of different floral sources of honey. Int J Food Prop 16, 658-666.
  • 26. Shamala TR, Jyothi YPS, Saibaba P (2002): Antibacterial effect of honey on the in vitro and in vivo growth of Escherichia coli. World J Microb Biot 18, 863-865.
  • 27. Tan HT, Rahman RA, Gan SH, et al (2009): The antibacterial properties of Malaysian tualang honey against wound and enteric microorganisms in comparison to manuka honey. BMC Complem Altern M 9, 34.
  • 28. Tuksitha L, Chen YLS, Chen YL, et al (2018): Antioxidant and antibacterial capacity of stingless bee honey from Borneo (Sarawak). J Asia-Pac Entomol 21, 563-570.
  • 29. Wilkinson JM, Cavanagh HM (2005): Antibacterial activity of 13 honeys against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Food 8, 100-103.
  • 30. Zainol MI, Yusoff KM, Yusof MYM (2013): Antibacterial activity of selected Malaysian honey. BMC Complem Altern M 13, 129.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Veterinary Surgery
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Güzin İplikçioğlu Çil 0000-0001-6897-8222

Özlem Küplülü 0000-0002-1559-2390

Görkem Cengiz 0000-0001-9853-565X

Seda Dicle Korkmaz 0000-0002-4272-300X

Buse Arslan 0000-0001-6479-1698

Safa Gürcan 0000-0002-0738-1518

Publication Date September 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020Volume: 67 Issue: 4

Cite

APA İplikçioğlu Çil, G., Küplülü, Ö., Cengiz, G., Korkmaz, S. D., et al. (2020). Antibacterial activity of Turkish honey against selected foodborne pathogens. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 67(4), 413-418. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.674702
AMA İplikçioğlu Çil G, Küplülü Ö, Cengiz G, Korkmaz SD, Arslan B, Gürcan S. Antibacterial activity of Turkish honey against selected foodborne pathogens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. September 2020;67(4):413-418. doi:10.33988/auvfd.674702
Chicago İplikçioğlu Çil, Güzin, Özlem Küplülü, Görkem Cengiz, Seda Dicle Korkmaz, Buse Arslan, and Safa Gürcan. “Antibacterial Activity of Turkish Honey Against Selected Foodborne Pathogens”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67, no. 4 (September 2020): 413-18. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.674702.
EndNote İplikçioğlu Çil G, Küplülü Ö, Cengiz G, Korkmaz SD, Arslan B, Gürcan S (September 1, 2020) Antibacterial activity of Turkish honey against selected foodborne pathogens. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67 4 413–418.
IEEE G. İplikçioğlu Çil, Ö. Küplülü, G. Cengiz, S. D. Korkmaz, B. Arslan, and S. Gürcan, “Antibacterial activity of Turkish honey against selected foodborne pathogens”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 413–418, 2020, doi: 10.33988/auvfd.674702.
ISNAD İplikçioğlu Çil, Güzin et al. “Antibacterial Activity of Turkish Honey Against Selected Foodborne Pathogens”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67/4 (September 2020), 413-418. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.674702.
JAMA İplikçioğlu Çil G, Küplülü Ö, Cengiz G, Korkmaz SD, Arslan B, Gürcan S. Antibacterial activity of Turkish honey against selected foodborne pathogens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020;67:413–418.
MLA İplikçioğlu Çil, Güzin et al. “Antibacterial Activity of Turkish Honey Against Selected Foodborne Pathogens”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 67, no. 4, 2020, pp. 413-8, doi:10.33988/auvfd.674702.
Vancouver İplikçioğlu Çil G, Küplülü Ö, Cengiz G, Korkmaz SD, Arslan B, Gürcan S. Antibacterial activity of Turkish honey against selected foodborne pathogens. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020;67(4):413-8.