Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)

Bestami YILMAZ; İsmail DEMİRCİOĞLU; Faruk BOZKAYA; Nazan GEZER İNCE

doi:10.33988/auvfd.594391

Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

Araştırma Makalesi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 67 Sayı: 2, 161 - 168, 03.03.2020

Bestami YILMAZ İsmail DEMİRCİOĞLU Faruk BOZKAYA Nazan GEZER İNCE

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391

Cited By: 2

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Bärmann EV, Wronski T, Lerp H, et al. (2013): Morphometric and genetic framework for Gazella. Zoo J Linnean Soc, 169, 673-696.
2. Best KC, Garvin HM, Cabo LL (2018): An investigation into the relationship between human cranial and pelvic sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Sci, 63, 990-1000.
3. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al. (1982): Volume determinations using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 138, 329-333.
4. Chanpanitkitchote P, Tangphokhanon W, Nomsiri R, et al. (2015): Ratio of cranial and skull volumes in 25 mammalian species. Vet Integr Sci, 13, 165-177.
5. Christiansen P, Harris JM (2012): Variation in craniomandibular morphology and sexual dimorphism in Pantherines and the Sabercat Smilodon fatalis. PLoS One, 7, e48352.
6. Fandos P, Vigal CR (1993): Sexual dimorphism in size of the skull of Spanish ibex Capra pyrenaica. Acta Theriol, 33, 103-111.
7. Groves CP (1983): Notes on the gazelles IV: the Arabian gazelles collected by Hemprich and Ehrenberg. Z Saugetierkd, 48, 371–381.
8. Hasan HA (2017): Three dimensional computed tomography morphometric analysis of the orbit in Iraqi population. Int Med J, 24, 147-149.
9. Hayatgheib D, Karami M, Farahmand H, et al. (2011): Morphological study and comparison of western and eastern goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa: Guldenstaedt, 1780) populations in Iran. Int J Environ Res, 5, 225-232.
10. Ince NG, Demircioglu I, Yılmaz B, et al. (2018): Martılarda (Laridae spp.) cranium’un üç boyutlu modellemesi. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg, 7, 98-101.
11. Jaslow JR (1989): Sexual dimorphism of cranial suture complexity in wild sheep (Ovis orientalis). Zoo J Linnean Soc, 95, 273-284.
12. Kamal S (2006): Morphological and craniometrical studies on the skull of Kagani goat (Capra hircus) of Jammu region. Int J Morphol, 24, 449-455.
13. Kanchan T, Krishan K, Gupta A, et al. (2014): A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population. J Craniofac Surg, 25, 1645-1649.
14. Karimi I, Onar V, Pazvan G, et al. (2011): The cranial morphometric and morphologic characteristics of Mehraban sheep in Western Iran. Glob Vet, 6, 111-117.
15. Kataba A (2010): Biometric and morphologic characteristics of the skull of the Gwembe Valley Dwarf Goat (Capra Hircus) breed of Zambia. MSc, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
16. Kranioti EF (2019): Radiometry versus osteometry in sex assessment: a study of the Cretan radius. Aust J Forensic Sci, 51, 135-148.
17. Krupa P, Krsek P, Cernochova P, et al. (2004): 3D real modelling and CT biomodels application in facial surgery. In: Neuroradiology, Springer, Berlin.
18. Leslie DM (2010): Procapra picticaudata (Artiodactyla: Bovidae). Mamm Species, 42, 138-148.
19. Mallon DP, Kingswood SC (2001): Antelopes. Part 4: North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Global Survey and Regional Action Plans. SSC Antelope Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
20. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (2017): International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (ICVGAN), Published by the Editorial Committee, Hannover.
21. Özcan S, Aksoy G, Kürtül İ, et al. (2010): A comparative morphometric study on the skull of the Tuj and Morkaraman sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 111-114.
22. Özkurt A (2002): Üç boyutlu örneksel veriden yüzey modeli üretimi. DEUFMD, 4, 27–36.
23. Páral V, Tichý F, Fabiś M (2004): Functional structure of metapodial bones in Cattle. Acta Vet Brno, 73, 413-420.
24. Parés I, Casanova PM, Kamal S, et al. (2010): On biometrical aspects of the cephalic anatomy of Xisqueta sheep (Catalunya, Spain). Int J Morpol, 28, 347-351.
25. Parés-Casanova PM (2014): Osteometric study of the Rasquera White goat. J Appl Anim Res, 42, 177-185.
26. Tecirlioğlu S (1983): Sırtlan ve köpeğin iskelet kemikleri üzerinde makro-Anatomik araştırmalar. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 30, 149-166.
27. Teo EC, Holsgrove T, Haiblikova S (2017): 3D Morphometric analysis of human vertebrae C3-T3 using CT images reconstruction. J Spine, 6, 391.
28. Thouless CR, Al Bassri KA (1991): Taxonomic status of the Farasan island gazelle. J Zool Lond, 223, 151-159.
29. Von Den Driesch A (1976): A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
30. Wronski T, Sandouka M, Plath M, et al. (2010): Differences in sexual dimorphism among four gazelle taxa (Gazella spp.) in the Middle East. Animal Biol, 60, 395-412.
31. Zhu L. (2012): Craniometrical studies on the skull of Tibetan Gazelle (Procapra Picticaudata). Int J Morphol, 30, 196-198.

Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 67 Sayı: 2, 161 - 168, 03.03.2020

Bestami YILMAZ İsmail DEMİRCİOĞLU Faruk BOZKAYA Nazan GEZER İNCE

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391

Cited By: 2

Öz

This study was carried out to determine the osteometric features of the skull by using three dimensional computed tomography images in gazelles (Gazelle subgutturosa). In the study, nine skull samples of adult gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) were used. Images of the skull sections of 0.625 mm thickness were acquired by using a computer tomography device with 64 detectors applying 80 kV, 200 mA and 639 mGY. Three-dimensional images of the skull samples were reconstructed and morphometric measurements (39 linear, 1 volumetric and 1 surface area) were performed by using the software program MIMICS 12.1. Mean skull volumes in males and females were found to be 115.74±2.43 cm3 and 87.69±1.09 cm3 while the mean skull surface areas in males and females were 79.62±8.56 cm2 and 77.34±1.18 cm2, respectively. Significant differences between males and females for median frontal length (MFL), frontal length (FRL), upper neurocranium length (UNCL), greatest length of the lacrimal bone (GLLB), oral palatal length (OPL), length of the upper molar row (LUMR) and the greatest neurocranium breadth (GNCB) were observed. The difference in the cranial index between males and females was statistically significant (P<0.01). The data obtained in this study will contribute to detect differences between the gazelles and other species with respect to skull morphometry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

computed tomography, gazella, morphometry, reconstruction, skull

Kaynakça

1. Bärmann EV, Wronski T, Lerp H, et al. (2013): Morphometric and genetic framework for Gazella. Zoo J Linnean Soc, 169, 673-696.
2. Best KC, Garvin HM, Cabo LL (2018): An investigation into the relationship between human cranial and pelvic sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Sci, 63, 990-1000.
3. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al. (1982): Volume determinations using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 138, 329-333.
4. Chanpanitkitchote P, Tangphokhanon W, Nomsiri R, et al. (2015): Ratio of cranial and skull volumes in 25 mammalian species. Vet Integr Sci, 13, 165-177.
5. Christiansen P, Harris JM (2012): Variation in craniomandibular morphology and sexual dimorphism in Pantherines and the Sabercat Smilodon fatalis. PLoS One, 7, e48352.
6. Fandos P, Vigal CR (1993): Sexual dimorphism in size of the skull of Spanish ibex Capra pyrenaica. Acta Theriol, 33, 103-111.
7. Groves CP (1983): Notes on the gazelles IV: the Arabian gazelles collected by Hemprich and Ehrenberg. Z Saugetierkd, 48, 371–381.
8. Hasan HA (2017): Three dimensional computed tomography morphometric analysis of the orbit in Iraqi population. Int Med J, 24, 147-149.
9. Hayatgheib D, Karami M, Farahmand H, et al. (2011): Morphological study and comparison of western and eastern goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa: Guldenstaedt, 1780) populations in Iran. Int J Environ Res, 5, 225-232.
10. Ince NG, Demircioglu I, Yılmaz B, et al. (2018): Martılarda (Laridae spp.) cranium’un üç boyutlu modellemesi. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg, 7, 98-101.
11. Jaslow JR (1989): Sexual dimorphism of cranial suture complexity in wild sheep (Ovis orientalis). Zoo J Linnean Soc, 95, 273-284.
12. Kamal S (2006): Morphological and craniometrical studies on the skull of Kagani goat (Capra hircus) of Jammu region. Int J Morphol, 24, 449-455.
13. Kanchan T, Krishan K, Gupta A, et al. (2014): A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population. J Craniofac Surg, 25, 1645-1649.
14. Karimi I, Onar V, Pazvan G, et al. (2011): The cranial morphometric and morphologic characteristics of Mehraban sheep in Western Iran. Glob Vet, 6, 111-117.
15. Kataba A (2010): Biometric and morphologic characteristics of the skull of the Gwembe Valley Dwarf Goat (Capra Hircus) breed of Zambia. MSc, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
16. Kranioti EF (2019): Radiometry versus osteometry in sex assessment: a study of the Cretan radius. Aust J Forensic Sci, 51, 135-148.
17. Krupa P, Krsek P, Cernochova P, et al. (2004): 3D real modelling and CT biomodels application in facial surgery. In: Neuroradiology, Springer, Berlin.
18. Leslie DM (2010): Procapra picticaudata (Artiodactyla: Bovidae). Mamm Species, 42, 138-148.
19. Mallon DP, Kingswood SC (2001): Antelopes. Part 4: North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Global Survey and Regional Action Plans. SSC Antelope Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
20. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (2017): International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (ICVGAN), Published by the Editorial Committee, Hannover.
21. Özcan S, Aksoy G, Kürtül İ, et al. (2010): A comparative morphometric study on the skull of the Tuj and Morkaraman sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 111-114.
22. Özkurt A (2002): Üç boyutlu örneksel veriden yüzey modeli üretimi. DEUFMD, 4, 27–36.
23. Páral V, Tichý F, Fabiś M (2004): Functional structure of metapodial bones in Cattle. Acta Vet Brno, 73, 413-420.
24. Parés I, Casanova PM, Kamal S, et al. (2010): On biometrical aspects of the cephalic anatomy of Xisqueta sheep (Catalunya, Spain). Int J Morpol, 28, 347-351.
25. Parés-Casanova PM (2014): Osteometric study of the Rasquera White goat. J Appl Anim Res, 42, 177-185.
26. Tecirlioğlu S (1983): Sırtlan ve köpeğin iskelet kemikleri üzerinde makro-Anatomik araştırmalar. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 30, 149-166.
27. Teo EC, Holsgrove T, Haiblikova S (2017): 3D Morphometric analysis of human vertebrae C3-T3 using CT images reconstruction. J Spine, 6, 391.
28. Thouless CR, Al Bassri KA (1991): Taxonomic status of the Farasan island gazelle. J Zool Lond, 223, 151-159.
29. Von Den Driesch A (1976): A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
30. Wronski T, Sandouka M, Plath M, et al. (2010): Differences in sexual dimorphism among four gazelle taxa (Gazella spp.) in the Middle East. Animal Biol, 60, 395-412.
31. Zhu L. (2012): Craniometrical studies on the skull of Tibetan Gazelle (Procapra Picticaudata). Int J Morphol, 30, 196-198.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	İngilizce
Konular	Veteriner Cerrahi
Bölüm	Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar	Bestami YILMAZ Harran University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy 0000-0002-0901-3129 Türkiye İsmail DEMİRCİOĞLU Harran University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy 0000-0002-0724-3019 Türkiye Faruk BOZKAYA Harran University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Genetics 0000-0001-6423-8067 Türkiye Nazan GEZER İNCE İstanbul Cerrahpaşa University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy 0000-0003-1627-5757 Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi	3 Mart 2020
Yayınlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2020Cilt: 67 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex	@araştırma makalesi { auvfd594391, journal = {Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1300-0861}, eissn = {1308-2817}, address = {}, publisher = {Ankara Üniversitesi}, year = {2020}, volume = {67}, number = {2}, pages = {161 - 168}, doi = {10.33988/auvfd.594391}, title = {Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)}, key = {cite}, author = {Yılmaz, Bestami and Demircioğlu, İsmail and Bozkaya, Faruk and Gezer İnce, Nazan} }
APA	Yılmaz, B. , Demircioğlu, İ. , Bozkaya, F. & Gezer İnce, N. (2020). Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi , 67 (2) , 161-168 . DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.594391
MLA	Yılmaz, B. , Demircioğlu, İ. , Bozkaya, F. , Gezer İnce, N. "Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)" . Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67 (2020 ): 161-168 <http://vetjournal.ankara.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/52756/594391>
Chicago	Yılmaz, B. , Demircioğlu, İ. , Bozkaya, F. , Gezer İnce, N. "Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67 (2020 ): 161-168
RIS	TY - JOUR T1 - Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) AU - BestamiYılmaz, İsmailDemircioğlu, FarukBozkaya, NazanGezer İnce Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.594391 DO - 10.33988/auvfd.594391 T2 - Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 161 EP - 168 VL - 67 IS - 2 SN - 1300-0861-1308-2817 M3 - doi: 10.33988/auvfd.594391 UR - https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote	%0 Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) %A Bestami Yılmaz , İsmail Demircioğlu , Faruk Bozkaya , Nazan Gezer İnce %T Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) %D 2020 %J Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1300-0861-1308-2817 %V 67 %N 2 %R doi: 10.33988/auvfd.594391 %U 10.33988/auvfd.594391
ISNAD	Yılmaz, Bestami , Demircioğlu, İsmail , Bozkaya, Faruk , Gezer İnce, Nazan . "Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 67 / 2 (Mart 2020): 161-168 . https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.594391
AMA	Yılmaz B. , Demircioğlu İ. , Bozkaya F. , Gezer İnce N. Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020; 67(2): 161-168.
Vancouver	Yılmaz B. , Demircioğlu İ. , Bozkaya F. , Gezer İnce N. Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 67(2): 161-168.
IEEE	B. Yılmaz , İ. Demircioğlu , F. Bozkaya ve N. Gezer İnce , "Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)", Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 67, sayı. 2, ss. 161-168, Mar. 2020, doi:10.33988/auvfd.594391

Cited By

Morphometric analysis of the skull of Hamdani sheep via Three‐Dimensional modelling

Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia

https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12873

Examination of the morphometric features and three-dimensional modelling of the skull in Van cats by using computed tomographic images

Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.775971

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin